API-571 Corrosion and Materials Professional Questions and Answers

API RP 571 under Oxidation states:

“Resistance to oxidation is improved significantly by increasing chromium content, as it promotes the formation of a protective chromium oxide (Cr₂O₃) layer.”

“Nickel may aid in high-temperature strength but does not directly improve oxidation resistance like chromium does.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 5.1.1 – Oxidation)

Hence, option A is correct.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Per API RP 571, 885 °F (475 °C) embrittlement primarily affects carbon and low-alloy steels, causing a loss of toughness without obvious microstructural changes visible by routine metallography. Because the damage mechanism manifests as a shift in ductile-to-brittle transition temperature (DBTT), confirmation requires mechanical property testing, not surface or volumetric NDE.

Impact testing (Charpy V-notch) and bend testing are specifically cited as effective methods to demonstrate the loss of toughness and increased brittleness associated with 475 °C embrittlement.

Why the other options are incorrect:

Metallography often shows little or no visible change.

Magnetic particle testing only detects surface-breaking flaws.

Ductility testing alone is not as definitive as impact toughness testing.

Referenced Documents (Study Basis):

API RP 571 – Section on 885 °F (475 °C) Embrittlement

API Corrosion and Materials Study Guide

======================

API RP 571 defines Hydrogen Embrittlement as:

“Improper PWHT can trap hydrogen within the microstructure of carbon steel or fail to relieve residual stresses, both of which increase the risk of hydrogen embrittlement.”

“Moisture in electrodes contributes to hydrogen-induced cracking, but embrittlement from atomic hydrogen is more directly tied to heat treatment and microstructure.”

Thus, option D is the most accurate.

API RP 571 under Polythionic Acid Stress Corrosion Cracking (PTA SCC) specifies:

“Cracking is usually intergranular, and often localized, especially in sensitized austenitic stainless steels exposed to sulfur-containing environments during shutdown or cleaning.”

“It is not always visible on inspection and may only become evident when a leak occurs.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.2.2.5 – PTA SCC)

Hence, option C is correct as it best describes the detection difficulty and behavior of PTA SCC.

According to API RP 571 Section 5.3.2.3 (Spheroidization):

“Spheroidization is the transformation of the microstructure of carbon and low alloy steels when exposed to elevated temperatures for long durations. The rate of spheroidization depends on temperature, prior microstructure, and exposure time... The microstructure becomes less effective at carrying loads, and strength is reduced.”

Key influencing factors for the rate of spheroidization are:

Temperature (higher accelerates the process),

Microstructure (initial phase distribution and morphology).

Pressure and hydrogen partial pressure are not relevant for this transformation, nor is stress a primary driver.

Therefore, Option D (temperature and microstructure) is correct.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Microbiologically Induced Corrosion (MIC) is one of the most universally applicable corrosion mechanisms, affecting:

Carbon steel

Low-alloy steel

Stainless steels

Copper alloys

Aluminum alloys

According to API RP 571, MIC can occur in any aqueous system where microorganisms are present, regardless of metallurgy.

By contrast:

Sour water corrosion and amine corrosion mainly affect carbon steel

Polythionic acid corrosion is limited to austenitic stainless steels

Referenced Documents (Study Basis):

API RP 571 – Section on Microbiologically Induced Corrosion

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

According to API RP 571, refractory materials are non-metallic and therefore do not experience metallic corrosion mechanisms such as carburization, sulfidation, or oxidation.

Instead, refractories degrade through:

Dusting (loss of material due to chemical or thermal attack)

Checking (crack formation caused by thermal cycling and differential expansion)

These are the primary and characteristic damage modes of refractories in high-temperature service.

Referenced Documents (Study Basis):

API RP 571 – Section on Refractory Degradation

======================

API RP 571 – Polythionic Acid Stress Corrosion Cracking:

“Polythionic acid SCC may be mistaken for wet H₂S damage because both involve cracking in austenitic stainless steels under certain conditions.”

Thus, option D is correct.

API RP 571 under Nitriding (Section 4.2.16):

“Nitriding occurs at elevated temperatures and is most severe at temperatures above 900°F (480°C).”

“This mechanism is associated with the reaction of ammonia or other nitrogen-containing compounds with the steel surface, leading to brittle nitride formation.”

Therefore, the correct answer is D.

According to API RP 941 and API RP 571, High Temperature Hydrogen Attack (HTHA) is highly influenced by hydrogen partial pressure at elevated temperatures:

“The likelihood and rate of HTHA increase with both temperature and hydrogen partial pressure. Operating beyond established material limits on the Nelson Curves can lead to internal decarburization and methane formation in the steel.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.2.1.3 – High Temperature Hydrogen Attack)

Therefore, among all listed damage types, HTHA is the most directly affected by high hydrogen partial pressures, making option D correct.

API RP 571 on Naphthenic Acid Corrosion (NAC):

“NAC results in thinning, especially in areas of high velocity and turbulence. Standard UT or radiographic inspection followed by UT thickness monitoring is typically used to detect wall loss.”

“Advanced techniques like angle-beam or eddy current are not typically required.”

So, option A correctly reflects the most effective and widely used method.

In steam systems, the absence of a steam trap allows condensate to accumulate, which can lead to corrosion from oxygen and carbon dioxide dissolved in the water—a classic case of condensate corrosion.

From API RP 571 Section 5.3.3.1 (Condensate Corrosion):

“If steam lines or equipment like soot blowers do not have proper drainage or steam traps, condensate may accumulate... Corrosion results from the presence of dissolved oxygen and/or carbon dioxide in the condensate.”

Thus, the correct answer is Option D (condensate corrosion).

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

According to API RP 571, creep damage is a time-dependent, high-temperature damage mechanism that occurs when materials are exposed to stress at temperatures typically above about 700 °F (370 °C) for extended periods. Creep damage results in void formation, microcracking, grain boundary separation, and eventual rupture.

Once creep damage has occurred, it is considered irreversible metallurgical degradation. API RP 571 clearly states that heat treatments cannot restore creep life because the material’s microstructure has already been permanently damaged.

Option A (PWHT at 1150 °F) may relieve residual stresses but does not heal creep voids or microcracks.

Option B (Solution annealing) is applicable to certain stainless steels but is not effective for reversing creep damage, particularly in low-alloy and Cr-Mo steels.

Option D (Preheating during welding) helps prevent hydrogen-related cracking but has no effect on existing creep damage.

API RP 571 emphasizes that the only effective mitigation for creep damage is to remove the affected material and replace it with sound material, or to retire the component if damage is widespread. Fitness-for-service assessments (API 579-1/ASME FFS-1) may be used to evaluate remaining life, but mitigation requires material removal.

Referenced Documents (Study Basis):

API RP 571 – Section on Creep and Stress Rupture Damage

API Corrosion and Materials Study Guide

======================

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

According to API RP 571, surface decarburization is a metallurgical degradation mechanism that occurs when carbon is removed from the surface layers of steel due to exposure to oxidizing environments at elevated temperatures. This results in a carbon-depleted surface layer.

Carbon is a primary strengthening element in carbon and low-alloy steels. When carbon is lost from the surface:

Hardness and tensile strength are reduced

Creep resistance and load-carrying capability decrease

The component becomes more susceptible to plastic deformation and failure under stress

API RP 571 states that decarburization leads to loss of mechanical strength, especially critical in high-temperature service, where components already operate close to material limits.

Why the other options are incorrect:

Option A: Stress cracking is not the primary effect; loss of strength is.

Option C: Decarburization does not directly accelerate oxidation or sulfidation, although both may coexist.

Option D: This is incorrect; decarburization is considered detrimental in high-temperature applications.

Referenced Documents (Study Basis):

API RP 571 – Section on Decarburization and Metal Dusting

API Corrosion and Materials Study Guide

======================

According to API RP 571, under the section "4.2.1.2 Brittle Fracture", the following conditions are explicitly identified as most critical for brittle fracture risk:

"Most processes run at elevated temperature, so the main concern is for brittle fracture during startup, shutdown, hydrotest, or other situations where equipment may be exposed to low temperatures."

"Equipment fabricated from materials susceptible to brittle fracture (e.g., carbon steel) is most vulnerable when exposed to low temperatures combined with high stress or pressure."

"A brittle fracture is characterized by a sudden and rapid crack propagation with little or no plastic deformation."

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.2.1.2 – Brittle Fracture)

Thus, while other options represent stress events, the main concern specifically noted by the standard is during start-up and shutdown—especially due to cooling and repressurization at low temperatures—making option A the most accurate choice.

In TR 942-B and API RP 582, it is emphasized:

“Nickel-based buttering is often used as an intermediate layer to reduce thermal stress mismatch during welding of ferritic and austenitic materials.”

“Nickel alloys have a coefficient of thermal expansion closer to that of both stainless steels and carbon steels, reducing stress concentrations and mitigating dissimilar weld cracking.”

“This technique also assists in achieving metallurgical compatibility and mitigating solidification cracking.”

Hence, option C is correct as it directly relates to minimizing thermal expansion mismatches.

According to API RP 571 and API RP 751:

“In HF alkylation units, carbon steel can be used if weld hardness is controlled to ≤ 200 Brinell (BHN). Exceeding this can significantly increase the corrosion rate and susceptibility to cracking.”

“Hard welds act as preferential corrosion sites due to microstructural inhomogeneity and stress concentration.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.3.3.4 – Hydrofluoric Acid Corrosion; API RP 751, Section 5.3 – Materials of Construction)

Thus, option D is correct.

According to API RP 571 Section 5.1.2.6 (Carbonate Stress Corrosion Cracking - CSCC):

“The cracking is usually intergranular and is most commonly detected using wet fluorescent magnetic-particle testing (WFMT) after surface cleaning. PT may not be sensitive enough to detect fine cracks formed by this mechanism.”

Because CSCC cracks are typically surface-connected and very fine, WFMT offers the best visibility, especially after proper surface prep.

Therefore, Option D is correct.

According to API RP 571 and API RP 583 (CUI-specific guidance):

“Neutron backscatter techniques are effective in detecting moisture within insulation systems, which can indicate areas of concern for corrosion under insulation (CUI).”

“This method provides non-invasive, quick identification of wet insulation without removing cladding.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.5.1 – Corrosion Under Insulation and API RP 583 – CUI Detection Techniques)

Thus, neutron backscatter is the preferred NDE method for moisture detection, making option B correct.

API RP 571 under Atmospheric Corrosion notes:

“The highest corrosion rates are typically observed between 80°F and 120°F (27°C–49°C), particularly when relative humidity is high and surfaces are wet from condensation or rain.”

“At higher temperatures, surface dryness generally reduces corrosion activity despite increased reaction kinetics.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.3.1.3 – Atmospheric Corrosion)

Thus, among the listed temperatures, 175°F is closest to the upper end of the most active corrosion window, making option A the most accurate answer.

API RP 571 on Brittle Fracture notes:

“The primary factor influencing brittle fracture is material toughness, especially at low temperatures.”

“Materials with low fracture toughness are susceptible to catastrophic failure when stressed below their ductile-to-brittle transition temperature.”

Hence, option A is correct.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

According to API RP 571, hydrofluoric (HF) acid corrosion rates increase significantly once operating temperatures exceed approximately 150 °F (65 °C).

Key points noted in API RP 571:

Below ~150 °F, corrosion rates are relatively low due to formation of protective iron fluoride films.

Above 150 °F, these films become unstable.

Corrosion rates increase rapidly with temperature, especially under high velocity and water contamination conditions.

Why the other options are incorrect:

Option A (100 °F) is below the threshold for accelerated corrosion.

Option C and D are well above the onset temperature but are not the minimum threshold.

API RP 571 explicitly identifies 150 °F (65 °C) as the critical temperature where corrosion acceleration begins.

Referenced Documents (Study Basis):

API RP 571 – Section on Hydrofluoric Acid Corrosion

API Alkylation Unit Corrosion Study Guide

According to API RP 571 Section 5.2.1 (Fatigue – High Cycle and Low Cycle):

“Unsupported small-bore attachments like vents and drains are prone to high-cycle mechanical fatigue due to vibration. These attachments experience cyclic stress, especially near welds or bends.”

Thermal overload is unlikely without over-temperature data.

SSC (Option C) requires a wet H2S environment, which is not indicated.

Weld defects may contribute but are less likely the root cause without other signs.

Hence, mechanical fatigue (Option A) is most probable in this configuration.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

According to API RP 571, ammonium bisulfide (NH₄HS) corrosion typically occurs in high-velocity, wet sour service, such as hydroprocessing reactor effluent systems. The damage is characterized by localized wall thinning, often with highly irregular corrosion profiles that vary with flow regime.

API RP 571 emphasizes that the most effective inspection techniques for NH₄HS corrosion are those capable of:

Detecting localized thinning

Identifying corrosion patterns related to flow velocity

Covering large areas efficiently

Ultrasonic scanning (C-scan) and profile radiography are specifically recommended because they:

Reveal localized and preferential metal loss

Allow comparison between high- and low-velocity zones

Are far superior to spot UT, which may miss localized attack

Referenced Documents (Study Basis):

API RP 571 – Section on Ammonium Bisulfide Corrosion

======================

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

According to API RP 571, carbon steel exhibits a minimum corrosion rate in sulfuric acid at concentrations around 65–70 wt% due to formation of a protective iron sulfate film.

When sulfuric acid concentration drops below approximately 65%, this protective film becomes unstable and corrosion rates increase dramatically.

Referenced Documents (Study Basis):

API RP 571 – Section on Sulfuric Acid Corrosion

======================

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Per API RP 571, deaerators often operate in environments where concentrated caustic solutions can form locally due to oxygen scavengers and water chemistry control additives.

When postweld heat treatment (PWHT) is not performed:

High residual welding stresses remain

Conditions are ideal for caustic stress corrosion cracking (Caustic SCC)

API RP 571 identifies deaerators as classic examples of equipment that has experienced caustic SCC when PWHT was omitted.

Referenced Documents (Study Basis):

API RP 571 – Section on Caustic Stress Corrosion Cracking

======================

API RP 571 details that:

“Sulfide Stress Cracking (SSC) susceptibility increases significantly with increased hardness of the steel.”

“NACE MR0175/ISO 15156 provides hardness limits for carbon and low-alloy steels to avoid SSC in sour environments. These are typically limited to 22 HRC or 248 Brinell.”

“High hardness promotes crack initiation under tensile stress in sour environments (i.e., containing H₂S).”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.2.2.1 – Sulfide Stress Corrosion Cracking)

While hydrogen-induced cracking (HIC) and blistering are related to hydrogen charging, SSC is the only mechanism directly and critically impacted by hardness, making option B correct.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Wet H₂S damage mechanisms include hydrogen blistering, hydrogen-induced cracking (HIC), stepwise cracking (SWC), and stress-oriented hydrogen-induced cracking (SOHIC). These mechanisms are primarily internal and subsurface, as described in API RP 571.

Shear Wave Ultrasonic Testing (SWUT) is specifically highlighted in API RP 571 as a preferred screening and detection method for wet H₂S damage because it can detect subsurface planar defects with minimal surface preparation. Typically, only basic coupling and access are required.

Why the other options are incorrect:

Option A (ACFM) is a surface crack detection technique and requires relatively clean surfaces; it is not suitable for subsurface hydrogen damage.

Option C (WFMT – Wet Fluorescent Magnetic Particle Testing) requires extensive surface preparation, coating removal, and direct access to the surface, and only detects surface-breaking flaws.

Option D (LPT – Liquid Penetrant Testing) also requires clean, bare metal surfaces and cannot detect subsurface damage.

API RP 571 explicitly notes that ultrasonic techniques, particularly shear wave UT, are widely used for detecting internal hydrogen-related cracking with minimal disruption and surface preparation, making it the most effective choice for wet H₂S damage screening.

Referenced Documents (Study Basis):

API RP 571 – Section on Wet H₂S Damage (HIC, SOHIC, Blistering)

API Corrosion and Materials Inspection Study Guide

API RP 571 identifies these parameters as critical to the corrosion rate of carbon and low alloy steels in sour water environments:

“The extent of corrosion in sour water is influenced by pH, H₂S content, temperature, liquid velocity, and oxygen contamination.”

“These factors control the formation and stability of protective iron sulfide layers.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.3.2.1 – Sour Water Corrosion)

Therefore, the correct answer is A.

According to API RP 571:

“Ammonium chloride corrosion is most aggressive when dry salts are exposed to a small amount of free water. This condition allows the formation of a concentrated acidic aqueous solution, which is highly corrosive to carbon steel.”

“The corrosion mechanism is activated especially during startup and shutdown when condensation may occur on salt deposits.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.3.3.1 – Ammonium Chloride Corrosion)

Hence, while salt deposition begins as temperatures drop, the most aggressive corrosion happens when water is introduced to dry salt, making option D correct.

API RP 571, under Organic Acid Corrosion, highlights:

“Corrosive organic acids in overhead systems are those that condense at temperatures above the water dew point. These acids condense independently of water and can form highly concentrated corrosive films.”

“When acids condense first, they aggressively corrode carbon steel prior to any water wash mitigation.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.3.3.9 – Organic Acid Corrosion)

Hence, option D correctly identifies the most aggressive corrosion scenario.

API RP 571 explains under Condensate Corrosion (CO₂ Corrosion):

“In condensate systems, carbon dioxide dissolves in the water forming carbonic acid, which leads to localized corrosion, including grooving and under-deposit attack, especially at low points like the bottom of horizontal piping.”

“This is most commonly observed in steam condensate return lines, and the damage is localized due to stratification.”

This matches the scenario described, where internal grooving at the bottom of steam condensate piping is characteristic of CO₂-induced corrosion. Hence, option A is correct.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Hydrochloric acid (HCl) corrosion in atmospheric crude units is primarily associated with the overhead system, where chloride salts hydrolyze to form HCl in the presence of condensed water. This damage mechanism is well documented in API RP 571 under “Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking and Hydrochloric Acid Corrosion”.

The primary indicator of HCl corrosion risk is the acidity of the condensed water in the overhead system. The overhead accumulator boot water collects condensed water where dissolved HCl will be present. Monitoring the pH of this water provides a direct, real-time indication of acid formation and corrosion severity.

Low pH values (typically below 5.5) indicate active HCl corrosion conditions.

API RP 571 states that pH monitoring is a key operational control and surveillance tool for managing overhead corrosion.

Why the other options are incorrect:

Option A (UT at water injection points) does not address overhead acid formation and is not a susceptibility monitoring method.

Option C (Corrosion probes or coupons) provide general corrosion rate data, but they do not directly measure HCl formation or acid severity and often respond too slowly for operational control.

Option D (UT scanning or radiography) is a damage detection method, not a susceptibility or early-warning monitoring technique.

API RP 571 emphasizes that effective monitoring of HCl corrosion requires controlling and monitoring water chemistry, especially pH in the overhead accumulator boot, to prevent severe localized corrosion and ammonium chloride salt deposition.

Referenced Documents (Study Basis):

API RP 571 – Section on Hydrochloric Acid Corrosion in Crude Unit Overhead Systems

API Corrosion and Materials Study Guides – Atmospheric Crude Unit Overhead Corrosion

API RP 571 on Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking (Cl-SCC) clearly states:

“Austenitic stainless steels such as 304 and 316 are highly susceptible to Cl-SCC when subjected to tensile stress and exposed to chloride-bearing environments.”

“Susceptibility is greatest in non-stress-relieved weldments or cold-worked areas.”

Brass and carbon steels are not typical Cl-SCC candidates; low alloy steels such as 1.25Cr-0.5Mo are also not commonly affected.

Thus, option C is the correct answer.

According to API RP 571 Section 5.3.2.1 (Creep):

“Creep damage is exponentially dependent on temperature. A small increase in temperature (e.g., 25°F or 15°C) can reduce remaining life by more than half. This is because the creep rate increases rapidly with temperature, especially above design limits.”

Stress is a contributing factor, but the dominant and most sensitive variable is temperature.

Thus, Option C (increase in temperature of 25°F/15°C) is the correct answer.

API RP 571 – Sulfidation:

“Sulfidation generally results in uniform thinning of iron-based alloys at temperatures above 500°F (260°C).”

“It is classified as a form of general corrosion, although it can be accelerated in turbulent flow areas.”

So, option A is correct.

Dissimilar Metal Cracking (DMC) is a form of high-temperature cracking that frequently occurs in weld joints between carbon steel and austenitic stainless steel (such as Type 316 SS) due to differences in thermal expansion coefficients and mechanical properties.

From API RP 571 Section 5.2.3.1 (Dissimilar Metal Weld Cracking):

“Cracking frequently occurs in weld joints between ferritic and austenitic materials such as carbon steel to 300 series stainless steels due to thermal expansion mismatch during high temperature operation.”

Therefore, Option D (Carbon steel to 316 stainless steel) is the most susceptible combination and the correct answer.

According to API RP 571, in the section on Boiler Water Condensate Corrosion:

“The major contributors to condensate corrosion are dissolved CO₂ and O₂. Carbon dioxide forms carbonic acid in the presence of water, lowering pH and causing generalized corrosion.”

“Oxygen causes pitting and localized corrosion unless chemically treated.”

Thus, option B (Carbon dioxide and oxygen) is the primary root cause and the correct answer.

From API RP 571, under Cooling Water Corrosion:

“If proper water treatment is not feasible or consistently maintained, upgrading the metallurgy of exchanger tubes to more corrosion-resistant materials such as stainless steel or titanium may be necessary.”

“This is especially important in seawater or brackish water cooling applications or in once-through systems.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.3.1.1 – Cooling Water Corrosion)

Thus, the most effective long-term solution in cases of uncontrolled water quality is to upgrade metallurgy, making option C correct.

According to API RP 571, under Naphthenic Acid Corrosion (NAC):

“The most severe corrosion is typically found in areas of high velocity and turbulence, such as at pump around nozzles, transfer lines, elbows, reducers, and orifices.”

“NAC is characterized by uniform thinning and can accelerate significantly where flow-induced erosion is present.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.3.4.1 – Naphthenic Acid Corrosion)

This clearly establishes that high velocity and turbulence increase NAC severity, making option D correct.

API RP 571 states under Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking (Cl-SCC):

“Nickel contents above approximately 35% provide significant resistance to chloride stress corrosion cracking. Alloys such as Alloy 625 and Alloy 825 exhibit excellent resistance.”

“Austenitic stainless steels with lower nickel contents, such as 304 and 316, are more susceptible to Cl-SCC.”

Hence, option C (35%) is correct.