Data-Engineer-Associate AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) Questions and Answers

This solution will meet the requirements with the least operational overhead because it uses the AWS Glue Data Catalog as the central metadata repository for data sources that run in the AWS Cloud. The AWS Glue Data Catalog is a fully managed service that provides a unified view of your data assets across AWS and on-premises data sources. It stores the metadata of your data in tables, partitions, and columns, and enables you to access and query your data using various AWS services, such as Amazon Athena, Amazon EMR, and Amazon Redshift Spectrum. You can use AWS Glue crawlers to connect to multiple data stores, such as Amazon RDS, Amazon Redshift, and Amazon S3, and to update the Data Catalog with metadata changes. AWS Glue crawlers can automatically discover the schema and partition structure of your data, and create or update the corresponding tables in the Data Catalog. You can schedule the crawlers to run periodically to update the metadata catalog, and configure them to detect changes to the source metadata, such as new columns, tables, or partitions12.

The other options are not optimal for the following reasons:

A. Use Amazon Aurora as the data catalog. Create AWS Lambda functions that will connect to the data catalog. Configure the Lambda functions to gather the metadata information from multiple sources and to update the Aurora data catalog. Schedule the Lambda functions to run periodically. This option is not recommended, as it would require more operational overhead to create and manage an Amazon Aurora database as the data catalog, and to write and maintain AWS Lambda functions to gather and update the metadata information from multiple sources. Moreover, this option would not leverage the benefits of the AWS Glue Data Catalog, such as data cataloging, data transformation, and data governance.

C. Use Amazon DynamoDB as the data catalog. Create AWS Lambda functions that will connect to the data catalog. Configure the Lambda functions to gather the metadata information from multiple sources and to update the DynamoDB data catalog. Schedule the Lambda functions to run periodically. This option is also not recommended, as it would require more operational overhead to create and manage an Amazon DynamoDB table as the data catalog, and to write and maintain AWS Lambda functions to gather and update the metadata information from multiple sources. Moreover, this option would not leverage the benefits of the AWS Glue Data Catalog, such as data cataloging, data transformation, and data governance.

D. Use the AWS Glue Data Catalog as the central metadata repository. Extract the schema for Amazon RDS and Amazon Redshift sources, and build the Data Catalog. Use AWS Glue crawlers for data that is in Amazon S3 to infer the schema and to automatically update the Data Catalog. This option is not optimal, as it would require more manual effort to extract the schema for Amazon RDS and Amazon Redshift sources, and to build the Data Catalog. This option would not take advantage of the AWS Glue crawlers’ ability to automatically discover the schema and partition structure of your data from various data sources, and to create or update the corresponding tables in the Data Catalog.

1: AWS Glue Data Catalog

2: AWS Glue Crawlers

Amazon Aurora

AWS Lambda

Amazon DynamoDB

Option C is correct because Amazon Redshift data sharing is built for exactly this use case: providing live, immediate, read-only access to data across Redshift clusters and AWS accounts without copying or moving the data. AWS states that data sharing lets you share live data “without having to create a copy or move it,” and that users can access the most up-to-date and consistent information as it is updated in the producer cluster. AWS also documents that data sharing provides instant, granular, and high-performance access across Amazon Redshift clusters and AWS accounts, which directly matches the requirement to preserve current Redshift performance. Since the downstream clusters use RA3 nodes, they satisfy the node-family requirement commonly associated with Redshift data sharing scenarios.

Option A would move the data to S3 and query it through Spectrum, which changes the performance profile and does not maintain native Redshift performance characteristics as well as direct Redshift data sharing. Option B introduces delay and duplicated storage through ETL copies. Option D is not an appropriate method for synchronizing Redshift datasets between clusters. Therefore, Redshift data sharing is the most direct, immediate, and performance-preserving solution.

Problem Analysis:

The goal is to create a new empty table in Athena with the same schema as an existing table (old_table).

The solution must avoid copying any data.

Key Considerations:

CREATE TABLE AS (CTAS) is commonly used in Athena for creating new tables based on an existing table.

Adding the WITH NO DATA clause ensures only the schema is copied, without transferring any data.

Solution Analysis:

Option A: Copies both schema and data. Does not meet the requirement for an empty table.

Option B: Inserts data into an existing table, which does not create a new table.

Option C: Creates an empty table but does not copy the schema.

Option D: Creates a new table with the same schema and ensures it is empty by using WITH NO DATA.

Final Recommendation:

Use D. CREATE TABLE new_table AS (SELECT * FROM old_table) WITH NO DATA to create an empty table with the same schema.

Athena CTAS Queries

CREATE TABLE Statement in Athena

The company is facing performance issues loading data into Amazon Redshift because it is issuing separate COPY commands for each data file location. The most efficient way to increase the speed of data ingestion into Redshift without increasing the cost is to use a manifest file.

Option D: Create a manifest file that contains the data file locations. Use a COPY command to load the data into Amazon Redshift.A manifest file provides a list of all the data files, allowing the COPY command to load all files in parallel from different locations in Amazon S3. This significantly improves the loading speed without adding costs, as it optimizes the data loading process in a single COPY operation.

Other options (A, B, C) involve additional steps that would either increase the cost (provisioning clusters, using Glue, etc.) or do not address the core issue of needing a unified and efficient COPY process.

The company wants to ensure that no customer records are deleted or modified for 7 years, and even the root user should not have the ability to change the data. S3 Object Lock in Compliance Mode is the correct solution for this scenario.

Option B: Enable compliance mode on the S3 bucket. Use a default retention period of 7 years.In Compliance Mode, even the root user cannot delete or modify locked objects during the retention period. This ensures that the data is protected for the entire 7-year duration as required. Compliance mode is stricter than governance mode and prevents all forms of alteration, even by privileged users.

Option A (Governance Mode) still allows certain privileged users (like the root user) to bypass the lock, which does not meet the company ' s requirement. Option C (legal hold) and Option D (setting retention per object) do not fully address the requirement to block root user modifications.

The telecommunications company needs a low-latency solution to detect sudden drops in network usage from real-time data collected throughout the day.

Option B: Modify the processing application to publish the data to an Amazon Kinesis data stream. Create an Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink (Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics) application to detect drops in network usage.Using Amazon Kinesis with Managed Service for Apache Flink (formerly Kinesis Data Analytics) is ideal for real-time stream processing with minimal latency. Flink can analyze the incoming data stream in real-time and detect anomalies, such as sudden drops in usage, which makes it the best fit for this scenario.

Other options (A, C, and D) either introduce unnecessary delays (e.g., querying databases) or do not provide the same real-time, low-latency processing that is critical for this use case.

Option A minimizes administration because it keeps one base IAM role for the pipeline and enforces regional locality at session time by attaching a session policy when the broker calls AssumeRole. This aligns with the security best practice of applying only what is necessary, because permissions should be limited to the exact scope required for the session. The material explicitly emphasizes the principle of least privilege, stating that permissions “should apply only to what is necessary,” and the most appropriate approach is to grant only the minimum actions needed for the job.

With session policies, the organization avoids creating and maintaining separate per-Region roles (Option B), avoids managing users and group memberships for federated sessions (Option C), and avoids individually attaching policies per engineer (Option D). Instead, the broker can dynamically apply a Region-specific restriction for each login, ensuring the temporary credentials are valid only for the engineer’s working Region. This design reduces ongoing operational burden while still enforcing strict locality controls through temporary, scoped credentials and least-privilege boundaries.

According to the guide:

“For integrating streaming data from Amazon MSK into Amazon Redshift efficiently and cost-effectively, AWS Glue streaming jobs can process and transform the data, storing it in Amazon S3. Amazon Redshift Spectrum can then directly query the data from S3, minimizing operational overhead and reducing storage costs.”

– Ace the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate Certification - version 2 - apple.pdf

This setup offers:

Low latency via Glue streaming.

Low storage cost by using Parquet/ORC on S3.

Minimal operational overhead by avoiding complex pipelines or constantly updated materialized views.

The DatasetMatch rule in DQDL checks for full value equivalence between mapped fields. A value of 1.0 indicates a 100% match. The correct syntax and metric for an exact match scenario are:

“Use DatasetMatch when comparing mapped fields between two datasets. The comparison score of 1.0 confirms a perfect match.”

– Ace the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate Certification - version 2 - apple.pdf

Options with “100” use incorrect syntax since DQDL uses floating-point scores (e.g., 1.0, 0.95), not percentages.

 Amazon AppFlow is a fully managed integration service that enables you to securely transfer data between SaaS applications and AWS services like Amazon S3 and Amazon Redshift. Amazon AppFlow supports many SaaS applications as data sources and targets, and allows you to configure data flows with a few clicks. Amazon AppFlow also provides features such as data transformation, filtering, validation, and encryption to prepare and protect your data. Amazon AppFlow meets the requirements of the media company with the least operational overhead, as it eliminates the need to write code, manage infrastructure, or monitor data pipelines. References:

Amazon AppFlow

Amazon AppFlow | SaaS Integrations List

Get started with data integration from Amazon S3 to Amazon Redshift using AWS Glue interactive sessions

Amazon Redshift is a fully managed, petabyte-scale data warehouse service that enables fast and cost-effective analysis of large volumes of data. Amazon Redshift uses columnar storage, compression, and zone maps to optimize the storage and performance of data. However, over time, as data is inserted, updated, or deleted, the physical storage of data can become fragmented, resulting in wasted disk space and degraded query performance. To address this issue, Amazon Redshift provides the VACUUM command, which reclaims disk space and resorts rows in either a specified table or all tables in the current schema1.

The VACUUM command has four options: FULL, DELETE ONLY, SORT ONLY, and REINDEX. The option that best meets the requirements of the question is VACUUM REINDEX, which re-sorts the rows in a table that has an interleaved sort key and rewrites the table to a new location on disk. An interleaved sort key is a type of sort key that gives equal weight to each column in the sort key, and stores the rows in a way that optimizes the performance of queries that filter by multiple columns in the sort key. However, as data is added or changed, the interleaved sort order can become skewed, resulting in suboptimal query performance. The VACUUM REINDEX option restores the optimal interleaved sort order and reclaims disk space by removing deleted rows. This option also analyzes the sort key column and updates the table statistics, which are used by the query optimizer to generate the most efficient query execution plan23.

The other options are not optimal for the following reasons:

A. VACUUM FULL Orders. This option reclaims disk space by removing deleted rows and resorts the entire table. However, this option is not suitable for tables that have an interleaved sort key, as it does not restore the optimal interleaved sort order. Moreover, this option is the most resource-intensive and time-consuming, as it rewrites the entire table to a new location on disk.

B. VACUUM DELETE ONLY Orders. This option reclaims disk space by removing deleted rows, but does not resort the table. This option is not suitable for tables that have any sort key, as it does not improve the query performance by restoring the sort order. Moreover, this option does not analyze the sort key column and update the table statistics.

D. VACUUM SORT ONLY Orders. This option resorts the entire table, but does not reclaim disk space by removing deleted rows. This option is not suitable for tables that have an interleaved sort key, as it does not restore the optimal interleaved sort order. Moreover, this option does not analyze the sort key column and update the table statistics.

1: Amazon Redshift VACUUM

2: Amazon Redshift Interleaved Sorting

3: Amazon Redshift ANALYZE

Changing the volume type of the existing gp2 volumes to gp3 is the easiest and fastest way to migrate to the new storage type without any downtime or data loss. You can use the AWS Management Console, the AWS CLI, or the Amazon EC2 API to modify the volume type, size, IOPS, and throughput of your gp2 volumes. The modification takes effect immediately, and you can monitor the progress of the modification using CloudWatch. The other options are either more complex or require additional steps, such as creating snapshots, transferring data, or attaching new volumes, which can increase the operational overhead and the risk of errors. References:

Migrating Amazon EBS volumes from gp2 to gp3 and save up to 20% on costs (Section: How to migrate from gp2 to gp3)

Switching from gp2 Volumes to gp3 Volumes to Lower AWS EBS Costs (Section: How to Switch from GP2 Volumes to GP3 Volumes)

Modifying the volume type, IOPS, or size of an EBS volume - Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Section: Modifying the volume type)

Step 1: Understanding the Problem

The company collects clickstream data via Amazon Kinesis Data Streams and stores it in JSON format in Amazon S3 using Kinesis Data Firehose. They use Amazon Athena to query the data, but they want to reduce Athena costs while maintaining the same data pipeline.

Since Athena charges based on the amount of data scanned during queries, reducing the data size (by converting JSON to a more efficient format like Apache Parquet) is a key solution to lowering costs.

Step 2: Why Option A is Correct

Option A provides a straightforward way to reduce costs with minimal management overhead:

Changing the Firehose output format to Parquet: Parquet is a columnar data format, which is more compact and efficient than JSON for Athena queries. It significantly reduces the amount of data scanned, which in turn reduces Athena query costs.

Custom S3 Object Prefix (YYYYMMDD): Adding a date-based prefix helps in partitioning the data, which further improves query efficiency in Athena by limiting the data scanned to only relevant partitions.

AWS Glue ETL Job for Existing Data: To handle existing data stored in JSON format, a one-time AWS Glue ETL job can combine small JSON files, convert them to Parquet, and apply the YYYYMMDD prefix. This ensures consistency in the S3 bucket structure and allows Athena to efficiently query historical data.

ALTER TABLE ADD PARTITION: This command updates Athena ' s table metadata to reflect the new partitions, ensuring that future queries target only the required data.

Step 3: Why Other Options Are Not Ideal

Option B (Apache Spark on EMR) introduces higher management effort by requiring the setup of Apache Spark jobs and an Amazon EMR cluster. While it achieves the goal of converting JSON to Parquet, it involves running and maintaining an EMR cluster, which adds operational complexity.

Option C (Kinesis and Apache Flink) is a more complex solution involving Apache Flink, which adds a real-time streaming layer to aggregate data. Although Flink is a powerful tool for stream processing, it adds unnecessary overhead in this scenario since the company already uses Kinesis Data Firehose for batch delivery to S3.

Option D (AWS Lambda with Firehose) suggests using AWS Lambda to convert records in real time. While Lambda can work in some cases, it ' s generally not the best tool for handling large-scale data transformations like JSON-to-Parquet conversion due to potential scaling and invocation limitations. Additionally, running parallel Glue jobs further complicates the setup.

Step 4: How Option A Minimizes Costs

By using Apache Parquet, Athena queries become more efficient, as Athena will scan significantly less data, directly reducing query costs.

Firehose natively supports Parquet as an output format, so enabling this conversion in Firehose requires minimal effort. Once set, new data will automatically be stored in Parquet format in S3, without requiring any custom coding or ongoing management.

The AWS Glue ETL job for historical data ensures that existing JSON files are also converted to Parquet format, ensuring consistency across the data stored in S3.

Conclusion:

Option A meets the requirement to reduce Athena costs without recreating the data pipeline, using Firehose’s native support for Apache Parquet and a simple one-time AWS Glue ETL job for existing data. This approach involves minimal management effort compared to the other solutions.

Option D is correct because Amazon DynamoDB is a serverless NoSQL database that is well suited for semi-structured data, and DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX) is designed to improve read performance for read-heavy applications. AWS documentation states that DAX can improve DynamoDB performance from milliseconds to microseconds, and the DynamoDB guide says DAX is most effective for applications with a high read-to-write ratio, which exactly matches this workload of infrequent writes and frequent reads.

Option A and B are incorrect because Amazon S3 and Iceberg are object storage and table-format solutions, not low-latency transactional databases for millisecond retrieval. Option C is not serverless and requires managing a database cluster, even if optimized reads improve performance. By contrast, DynamoDB is fully managed and serverless, and DAX adds the lowest-latency read path for hot data. The uploaded study guide also identifies DynamoDB as the right fit for dynamic or semi-structured data that requires low-latency access at scale.

Amazon Athena charges per amount of data scanned by each query. When the same query with identical parameters is executed multiple times, re-scanning the data repeatedly increases both cost and execution time. Athena provides query result reuse, which allows previously computed query results to be reused when an identical query is rerun within a configurable time window.

By enabling query result reuse at the Athena workgroup level, Athena automatically returns cached results instead of re-reading data from Amazon S3. This significantly improves query performance while reducing data scan costs. This feature is specifically designed for workloads where analysts frequently rerun complex queries with the same parameters, which directly matches the scenario.

Converting data to JSON would degrade performance because JSON is not a columnar format and increases scan size. Using Amazon EMR introduces unnecessary infrastructure management and cost for a query optimization problem that Athena already solves natively. Amazon Redshift Spectrum is intended for querying S3 data from within Redshift and does not address repeated-query optimization in Athena.

Therefore, configuring query result reuse in the Athena workgroup is the most cost-effective and operationally efficient solution.

The requirement is to manage the size of an Amazon DynamoDB table by automatically deleting data older than 1 month without disrupting ongoing read or write operations. The simplest and most maintenance-free solution is to use DynamoDB Time-to-Live (TTL).

Option A: Use the DynamoDB TTL feature to automatically expire data based on timestamps.DynamoDB TTL allows you to specify an attribute (e.g., a timestamp) that defines when items in the table should expire. After the expiration time, DynamoDB automatically deletes the items, freeing up storage space and keeping the table size under control without manual intervention or disruptions to ongoing operations.

Other options involve higher maintenance and manual scheduling or scanning operations, which increase complexity unnecessarily compared to the native TTL feature.

AWS Secrets Manager is a service that allows you to securely store and manage secrets, such as database credentials, API keys, passwords, etc. You can use Secrets Manager to encrypt, rotate, and audit your secrets, as well as to control access to them using fine-grained policies. AWS Glue is a fully managed service that provides a serverless data integration platform for data preparation, data cataloging, and data loading. AWS Glue jobs allow you to transform and load data from various sources into various targets, using either a graphical interface (AWS Glue Studio) or a code-based interface (AWS Glue console or AWS Glue API).

Storing the credentials in AWS Secrets Manager and granting the AWS Glue job 1AM role access to the stored credentials will meet the requirements, as it will remediate the security vulnerability in the AWS Glue job and securely store the credentials. By using AWS Secrets Manager, you can avoid hard coding the credentials in the job script, which is a bad practice that exposes the credentials to unauthorized access or leakage. Instead, you can store the credentials as a secret in Secrets Manager and reference the secret name or ARN in the job script. You can also use Secrets Manager to encrypt the credentials using AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS), rotate the credentials automatically or on demand, and monitor the access to the credentials using AWS CloudTrail. By granting the AWS Glue job 1AM role access to the stored credentials, you can use the principle of least privilege to ensure that only the AWS Glue job can retrieve the credentials from Secrets Manager. You can also use resource-based or tag-based policies to further restrict the access to the credentials.

The other options are not as secure as storing the credentials in AWS Secrets Manager and granting the AWS Glue job 1AM role access to the stored credentials. Storing the credentials in the AWS Glue job parameters will not remediate the security vulnerability, as the job parameters are still visible in the AWS Glue console and API. Storing the credentials in a configuration file that is in an Amazon S3 bucket and accessing the credentials from the configuration file by using the AWS Glue job will not be as secure as using Secrets Manager, as the configuration file may not be encrypted or rotated, and the access to the file may not be audited or controlled. References:

AWS Secrets Manager

AWS Glue

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide, Chapter 6: Data Integration and Transformation, Section 6.1: AWS Glue

The streaming ingestion feature of Amazon Redshift enables you to ingest data from streaming sources, such as Amazon Kinesis Data Streams, into Amazon Redshift tables in near real-time. You can use the streaming ingestion feature to process the streaming data from the wearable devices, hospital equipment, and patient records. The streaming ingestion feature also supports incremental updates, which means you can append new data or update existing data in the Amazon Redshift tables. This way, you can store the data in an Amazon Redshift Serverless warehouse and support near real-time analytics of the streaming data and the previous day’s data. This solution meets the requirements with the least operational overhead, as it does not require any additional services or components to ingest and process the streaming data. The other options are either not feasible or not optimal. Loading data into Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose and then into Amazon Redshift (option A) would introduce additional latency and cost, as well as require additional configuration and management. Loading data into Amazon S3 and then using the COPY command to load the data into Amazon Redshift (option C) would also introduce additional latency and cost, as well as require additional storage space and ETL logic. Using the Amazon Aurora zero-ETL integration with Amazon Redshift (option D) would not work, as it requires the data to be stored in Amazon Aurora first, which is not the case for the streaming data from the healthcare company. References:

Using streaming ingestion with Amazon Redshift

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide, Chapter 3: Data Ingestion and Transformation, Section 3.5: Amazon Redshift Streaming Ingestion

AWS Step Functions allows you to orchestrate ETL jobs and workflows by integrating with AWS Glue and EventBridge. It supports both scheduled and event-driven executions with minimal operational overhead, making it ideal for hybrid triggering.

AWS Glue workflows are limited in orchestration logic.

MWAA (option B) is powerful but requires more infrastructure management.

EMR Serverless + Lambda (option D) is possible but involves more components.

“Use Step Functions to coordinate multiple services like Glue and EventBridge for event-driven or scheduled workflows.”

 Amazon Redshift Spectrum is a feature that allows you to run SQL queries directly against data in Amazon S3, without loading or transforming the data. Redshift Spectrum can query various data formats, such as CSV, JSON, ORC, Avro, and Parquet. However, not all data formats are equally efficient for querying. Some data formats, such as CSV and JSON, are row-oriented, meaning that they store data as a sequence of records, each with the same fields. Row-oriented formats are suitable for loading and exporting data, but they are not optimal for analytical queries that often access only a subset of columns. Row-oriented formats also do not support compression or encoding techniques that can reduce the data size and improve the query performance.

On the other hand, some data formats, such as ORC and Parquet, are column-oriented, meaning that they store data as a collection of columns, each with a specific data type. Column-oriented formats are ideal for analytical queries that often filter, aggregate, or join data by columns. Column-oriented formats also support compression and encoding techniques that can reduce the data size and improve the query performance. For example, Parquet supports dictionary encoding, which replaces repeated values with numeric codes, and run-length encoding, which replaces consecutive identical values with a single value and a count. Parquet also supports various compression algorithms, such as Snappy, GZIP, and ZSTD, that can further reduce the data size and improve the query performance.

Therefore, using a columnar storage file format, such as Parquet, will provide faster queries, as it allows Redshift Spectrum to scan only the relevant columns and skip the rest, reducing the amount of data read from S3. Additionally, partitioning the data based on the most common query predicates, such as date, time, region, etc., will provide faster queries, as it allows Redshift Spectrum to prune the partitions that do not match the query criteria, reducing the amount of data scanned from S3. Partitioning also improves the performance of joins and aggregations, as it reduces data skew and shuffling.

The other options are not as effective as using a columnar storage file format and partitioning the data. Using gzip compression to compress individual files to sizes that are between 1 GB and 5 GB will reduce the data size, but it will not improve the query performance significantly, as gzip is not a splittable compression algorithm and requires decompression before reading. Splitting the data into files that are less than 10 KB will increase the number of files and the metadata overhead, which will degrade the query performance. Using file formats that are not supported by Redshift Spectrum, such as XML, will not work, as Redshift Spectrum will not be able to read or parse the data. References:

Amazon Redshift Spectrum

Choosing the Right Data Format

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide, Chapter 4: Data Lakes and Data Warehouses, Section 4.3: Amazon Redshift Spectrum

Option C is correct because the company only needs to keep the original files for 90 days and then delete them. AWS states that S3 Lifecycle can be used to delete expired objects automatically, which directly matches this requirement. There is no need to transition the objects to another storage class because the files are not needed beyond day 90. Adding a transition step would add complexity and, in this case, would not improve cost-effectiveness.

Option A is not optimal because S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval has a 90-day minimum storage duration and is intended for longer-term archival. Transitioning objects right before deleting them is unnecessary overhead and can add minimum-duration charges. Option B is incorrect because Object Lock is for retention and write-once-read-many protection, not for normal temporary retention with lowest cost. Option D is also less cost-effective because S3 Intelligent-Tiering is useful when access patterns are uncertain, but here the retention period and deletion timing are already known. The simplest and cheapest solution is to keep the originals in S3 Standard for the required 90 days and then expire them with Lifecycle.

The best solution to ensure that the AWS Glue Data Catalog synchronizes with the S3 storage when the company adds new partitions to the bucket with the least latency is to use code that writes data to Amazon S3 to invoke the Boto3 AWS Glue create partition API call. This way, the Data Catalog is updated as soon as new data is written to S3, and the partition information is immediately available for querying by other services. The Boto3 AWS Glue create partition API call allows you to create a new partition in the Data Catalog by specifying the table name, the database name, and the partition values1. You can use this API call in your code that writes data to S3, such as a Python script or an AWS Glue ETL job, to create a partition for each new S3 object key that matches the partitioning scheme.

Option A is not the best solution, as scheduling an AWS Glue crawler to run every morning would introduce a significant latency between the time new data is written to S3 and the time the Data Catalog is updated. AWS Glue crawlers are processes that connect to a data store, progress through a prioritized list of classifiers to determine the schema for your data, and then create metadata tables in the Data Catalog2. Crawlers can be scheduled to run periodically, such as daily or hourly, but they cannot run continuously or in real-time. Therefore, using a crawler to synchronize the Data Catalog with the S3 storage would not meet the requirement of the least latency.

Option B is not the best solution, as manually running the AWS Glue CreatePartition API twice each day would also introduce a significant latency between the time new data is written to S3 and the time the Data Catalog is updated. Moreover, manually running the API would require more operational overhead and human intervention than using code that writes data to S3 to invoke the API automatically.

Option D is not the best solution, as running the MSCK REPAIR TABLE command from the AWS Glue console would also introduce a significant latency between the time new data is written to S3 and the time the Data Catalog is updated. The MSCK REPAIR TABLE command is a SQL command that you can run in the AWS Glue console to add partitions to the Data Catalog based on the S3 object keys that match the partitioning scheme3. However, this command is not meant to be run frequently or in real-time, as it can take a long time to scan the entire S3 bucket and add the partitions. Therefore, using this command to synchronize the Data Catalog with the S3 storage would not meet the requirement of the least latency. References:

AWS Glue CreatePartition API

Populating the AWS Glue Data Catalog

MSCK REPAIR TABLE Command

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide

For high-performance analytics in Athena and EMR Spark, the columnar storage formats Parquet and ORC deliver the shortest query times. These formats minimize I/O, enable predicate pushdown, and support efficient compression and parallel reads.

When integrated with the AWS Glue Data Catalog, schema evolution is automatically tracked and managed across queries.

This combination (Parquet/ORC + Glue Catalog) is explicitly recommended by AWS for analytical workloads on S3 data lakes.

“For analytical workloads using Amazon EMR and Athena, store data in columnar formats such as Parquet or ORC. These formats provide optimized compression and query performance.”

– Ace the AWS Certified Data Engineer – Associate Certification – version 2 – apple.pdf

“Use the AWS Glue Data Catalog to manage table schemas and schema evolution for columnar data formats such as Parquet and ORC.”

– Ace the AWS Certified Data Engineer – Associate Certification – version 2 – apple.pdf

Therefore, using ORC or Parquet along with the Glue Data Catalog achieves the shortest Athena query times and seamless schema management.

To meet both encryption at rest and in transit, a single Amazon EMR security configuration can be created specifying the AWS KMS key for encryption at rest and the PEM file for in-transit encryption. The study guide clearly states:

“AWS Key Management Service (KMS) provides encryption for data at rest, and SSL/TLS ensures encryption for data in transit, providing end-to-end encryption within an AWS environment.”

– Ace the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate Certification - version 2 - apple.pdf

A single security configuration is sufficient and the cleanest way to apply these security features during EMR cluster setup.

AWS Glue is a fully managed and serverless ETL platform that supports scripts in PySpark or Python shell jobs.

Workflows in Glue orchestrate multiple job stages without infrastructure management.

“Use AWS Glue Workflows to build and orchestrate complex multi-stage ETL pipelines using serverless AWS Glue jobs.”

– Ace the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate Certification - version 2 - apple.pdf

This meets the “serverless only” and “runs scripts” requirements precisely.

Amazon SageMaker ML Lineage Tracking provides a unified mechanism to automatically capture and track the lineage of ML artifacts (datasets, jobs, and models). It supports auditability, reproducibility, and compliance by maintaining metadata for every stage of the ML lifecycle.

“Use Amazon SageMaker Lineage Tracking to automatically record and track the lineage of data, training jobs, models, and endpoints to ensure auditability and reproducibility.”

– Ace the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate Certification - version 2 - apple.pdf

Problem Analysis:

The pipeline processes compressed files in S3 and must support incremental data processing.

AWS Glue features must facilitate tracking progress to avoid reprocessing the same data.

Key Considerations:

Incremental data processing requires tracking which files or partitions have already been processed.

The solution must be automated and efficient for large-scale ETL jobs.

Solution Analysis:

Option A: Workflows

Workflows organize and orchestrate multiple Glue jobs but do not track progress for incremental data processing.

Option B: Triggers

Triggers initiate Glue jobs based on a schedule or events but do not track which data has been processed.

Option C: Job Bookmarks

Job bookmarks track the state of the data that has been processed, enabling incremental processing.

Automatically skip files or partitions that were previously processed in Glue jobs.

Option D: Classifiers

Classifiers determine the schema of incoming data but do not handle incremental processing.

Final Recommendation:

Job bookmarks are specifically designed to enable incremental data processing in AWS Glue ETL pipelines.

AWS Glue Job Bookmarks Documentation

AWS Glue ETL Features

To query the Sales table in Amazon Redshift for city names that start with " San " or " El, " the appropriate query uses a regular expression (regex) pattern to match city names that begin with those prefixes.

Option B: Select * from Sales where city_name ~ ' ^(San|El) ' ;In Amazon Redshift, the ~ operator is used to perform pattern matching using regular expressions. The ^(San|El) pattern matches city names that start with " San " or " El. " This is the correct SQL syntax for this use case.

Other options (A, C, D) contain incorrect syntax or incorrect use of special characters, making them invalid queries.

Option A and B are the correct answers because they meet the requirements most cost-effectively. Using an AWS Lambda function and the Athena Boto3 client start_query_execution API call to invoke the Athena queries programmatically is a simple and scalable way to orchestrate the queries. Creating an AWS Step Functions workflow and adding two states to check the query status and invoke the next query is a reliable and efficient way to handle the long-running queries.

Option C is incorrect because using an AWS Glue Python shell job to invoke the Athena queries programmatically is more expensive than using a Lambda function, as it requires provisioning and running a Glue job for each query.

Option D is incorrect because using an AWS Glue Python shell script to run a sleep timer that checks every 5 minutes to determine whether the current Athena query has finished running successfully is not a cost-effective or reliable way to orchestrate the queries, as it wastes resources and time.

Option E is incorrect because using Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow (Amazon MWAA) to orchestrate the Athena queries in AWS Batch is an overkill solution that introduces unnecessary complexity and cost, as it requires setting up and managing an Airflow environment and an AWS Batch compute environment.

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide, Chapter 5: Data Orchestration, Section 5.2: AWS Lambda, Section 5.3: AWS Step Functions, Pages 125-135

Building Batch Data Analytics Solutions on AWS, Module 5: Data Orchestration, Lesson 5.1: AWS Lambda, Lesson 5.2: AWS Step Functions, Pages 1-15

AWS Documentation Overview, AWS Lambda Developer Guide, Working with AWS Lambda Functions, Configuring Function Triggers, Using AWS Lambda with Amazon Athena, Pages 1-4

AWS Documentation Overview, AWS Step Functions Developer Guide, Getting Started, Tutorial: Create a Hello World Workflow, Pages 1-8

The most efficient and low-operational-overhead solution for ingesting data into Amazon Redshift from Amazon Kinesis Data Streams is to use Amazon Redshift streaming ingestion. This feature allows Redshift to directly ingest streaming data from Kinesis Data Streams and process it in real-time.

Amazon Redshift Streaming Ingestion:

Redshift supports native streaming ingestion from Kinesis Data Streams, allowing real-time data to be queried using materialized views.

This solution reduces operational complexity because you don ' t need intermediary services like Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose or S3 for batch loading.

The best solution to meet the requirements of creating a data catalog that includes the IoT data, and allowing the analytics department to index the data, most cost-effectively, is to create an Amazon Athena workgroup, explore the data that is in Amazon S3 by using Apache Spark through Athena, and provide the Athena workgroup schema and tables to the analytics department.

Amazon Athena is a serverless, interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data directly in Amazon S3 using standard SQL or Python1. Amazon Athena also supports Apache Spark, an open-source distributed processing framework that can run large-scale data analytics applications across clusters of servers2. You can use Athena to run Spark code on data in Amazon S3 without having to set up, manage, or scale any infrastructure. You can also use Athena to create and manage external tables that point to your data in Amazon S3, and store them in an external data catalog, such as AWS Glue Data Catalog, Amazon Athena Data Catalog, or your own Apache Hive metastore3. You can create Athena workgroups to separate query execution and resource allocation based on different criteria, such as users, teams, or applications4. You can share the schemas and tables in your Athena workgroup with other users or applications, such as Amazon QuickSight, for data visualization and analysis5.

Using Athena and Spark to create a data catalog and explore the IoT data in Amazon S3 is the most cost-effective solution, as you pay only for the queries you run or the compute you use, and you pay nothing when the service is idle1. You also save on the operational overhead and complexity of managing data warehouse infrastructure, as Athena and Spark are serverless and scalable. You can also benefit from the flexibility and performance of Athena and Spark, as they support various data formats, including JSON, and can handle schema changes and complex queries efficiently.

Option A is not the best solution, as creating an AWS Glue Data Catalog, configuring an AWS Glue Schema Registry, creating a new AWS Glue workload to orchestrate the ingestion of the data that the analytics department will use into Amazon Redshift Serverless, would incur more costs and complexity than using Athena and Spark. AWS Glue Data Catalog is a persistent metadata store that contains table definitions, job definitions, and other control information to help you manage your AWS Glue components6. AWS Glue Schema Registry is a service that allows you to centrally store and manage the schemas of your streaming data in AWS Glue Data Catalog7. AWS Glue is a serverless data integration service that makes it easy to prepare, clean, enrich, and move data between data stores8. Amazon Redshift Serverless is a feature of Amazon Redshift, a fully managed data warehouse service, that allows you to run and scale analytics without having to manage data warehouse infrastructure9. While these services are powerful and useful for many data engineering scenarios, they are not necessary or cost-effective for creating a data catalog and indexing the IoT data in Amazon S3. AWS Glue Data Catalog and Schema Registry charge you based on the number of objects stored and the number of requests made67. AWS Glue charges you based on the compute time and the data processed by your ETL jobs8. Amazon Redshift Serverless charges you based on the amount of data scanned by your queries and the compute time used by your workloads9. These costs can add up quickly, especially if you have large volumes of IoT data and frequent schema changes. Moreover, using AWS Glue and Amazon Redshift Serverless would introduce additional latency and complexity, as you would have to ingest the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon Redshift Serverless, and then query it from there, instead of querying it directly from Amazon S3 using Athena and Spark.

Option B is not the best solution, as creating an Amazon Redshift provisioned cluster, creating an Amazon Redshift Spectrum database for the analytics department to explore the data that is in Amazon S3, and creating Redshift stored procedures to load the data into Amazon Redshift, would incur more costs and complexity than using Athena and Spark. Amazon Redshift provisioned clusters are clusters that you create and manage by specifying the number and type of nodes, and the amount of storage and compute capacity10. Amazon Redshift Spectrum is a feature of Amazon Redshift that allows you to query and join data across your data warehouse and your data lake using standard SQL11. Redshift stored procedures are SQL statements that you can define and store in Amazon Redshift, and then call them by using the CALL command12. While these features are powerful and useful for many data warehousing scenarios, they are not necessary or cost-effective for creating a data catalog and indexing the IoT data in Amazon S3. Amazon Redshift provisioned clusters charge you based on the node type, the number of nodes, and the duration of the cluster10. Amazon Redshift Spectrum charges you based on the amount of data scanned by your queries11. These costs can add up quickly, especially if you have large volumes of IoT data and frequent schema changes. Moreover, using Amazon Redshift provisioned clusters and Spectrum would introduce additional latency and complexity, as you would have to provision and manage the cluster, create an external schema and database for the data in Amazon S3, and load the data into the cluster using stored procedures, instead of querying it directly from Amazon S3 using Athena and Spark.

Option D is not the best solution, as creating an AWS Glue Data Catalog, configuring an AWS Glue Schema Registry, creating AWS Lambda user defined functions (UDFs) by using the Amazon Redshift Data API, and creating an AWS Step Functions job to orchestrate the ingestion of the data that the analytics department will use into Amazon Redshift Serverless, would incur more costs and complexity than using Athena and Spark. AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers13. AWS Lambda UDFs are Lambda functions that you can invoke from within an Amazon Redshift query. Amazon Redshift Data API is a service that allows you to run SQL statements on Amazon Redshift clusters using HTTP requests, without needing a persistent connection. AWS Step Functions is a service that lets you coordinate multiple AWS services into serverless workflows. While these services are powerful and useful for many data engineering scenarios, they are not necessary or cost-effective for creating a data catalog and indexing the IoT data in Amazon S3. AWS Glue Data Catalog and Schema Registry charge you based on the number of objects stored and the number of requests made67. AWS Lambda charges you based on the number of requests and the duration of your functions13. Amazon Redshift Serverless charges you based on the amount of data scanned by your queries and the compute time used by your workloads9. AWS Step Functions charges you based on the number of state transitions in your workflows. These costs can add up quickly, especially if you have large volumes of IoT data and frequent schema changes. Moreover, using AWS Glue, AWS Lambda, Amazon Redshift Data API, and AWS Step Functions would introduce additional latency and complexity, as you would have to create and invoke Lambda functions to ingest the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon Redshift Serverless using the Data API, and coordinate the ingestion process using Step Functions, instead of querying it directly from Amazon S3 using Athena and Spark. References:

What is Amazon Athena?

Apache Spark on Amazon Athena

Creating tables, updating the schema, and adding new partitions in the Data Catalog from AWS Glue ETL jobs

Managing Athena workgroups

Using Amazon QuickSight to visualize data in Amazon Athena

AWS Glue Data Catalog

AWS Glue Schema Registry

What is AWS Glue?

Amazon Redshift Serverless

Amazon Redshift provisioned clusters

Querying external data using Amazon Redshift Spectrum

Using stored procedures in Amazon Redshift

What is AWS Lambda?

[Creating and using AWS Lambda UDFs]

[Using the Amazon Redshift Data API]

[What is AWS Step Functions?]

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide

Amazon DynamoDB is a serverless, low-latency, NoSQL database ideal for semi-structured data.

Adding DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX) provides microsecond response times for read-heavy workloads.

“For applications requiring millisecond or sub-millisecond reads with serverless operation, use DynamoDB with DAX caching.”

– Ace the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate Certification - version 2 - apple.pdf

 Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service that provides fast and predictable performance with seamless scalability. DynamoDB offers two capacity modes for throughput capacity: provisioned and on-demand. In provisioned capacity mode, you specify the number of read and write capacity units per second that you expect your application to require. DynamoDB reserves the resources to meet your throughput needs with consistent performance. In on-demand capacity mode, you pay per request and DynamoDB scales the resources up and down automatically based on the actual workload. On-demand capacity mode is suitable for unpredictable workloads that can vary significantly over time1.

The solution that meets the requirements in the most cost-effective way is to use AWS Application Auto Scaling to schedule higher provisioned capacity for peak usage times and lower capacity during off-peak times. This solution has the following advantages:

It allows you to optimize the cost and performance of your DynamoDB table by adjusting the provisioned capacity according to your predictable workload patterns. You can use scheduled scaling to specify the date and time for the scaling actions, and the new minimum and maximum capacity limits. For example, you can schedule higher capacity for every Monday morning and lower capacity for weekends2.

It enables you to take advantage of the lower cost per unit of provisioned capacity mode compared to on-demand capacity mode. Provisioned capacity mode charges a flat hourly rate for the capacity you reserve, regardless of how much you use. On-demand capacity mode charges for each read and write request you consume, with no minimum capacity required. For predictable workloads, provisioned capacity mode can be more cost-effective than on-demand capacity mode1.

It ensures that your application performs consistently during peak usage times by having enough capacity to handle the increased load. You can also use auto scaling to automatically adjust the provisioned capacity based on the actual utilization of your table, and set a target utilization percentage for your table or global secondary index. This way, you can avoid under-provisioning or over-provisioning your table2.

Option A is incorrect because it suggests increasing the provisioned capacity to the maximum capacity that is currently present during peak load times. This solution has the following disadvantages:

It wastes money by paying for unused capacity during off-peak times. If you provision the same high capacity for all times, regardless of the actual workload, you are over-provisioning your table and paying for resources that you don’t need1.

It does not account for possible changes in the workload patterns over time. If your peak load times increase or decrease in the future, you may need to manually adjust the provisioned capacity to match the new demand. This adds operational overhead and complexity to your application2.

Option B is incorrect because it suggests dividing the table into two tables and provisioning each table with half of the provisioned capacity of the original table. This solution has the following disadvantages:

It complicates the data model and the application logic by splitting the data into two separate tables. You need to ensure that the queries are evenly distributed across both tables, and that the data is consistent and synchronized between them. This adds extra development and maintenance effort to your application3.

It does not solve the problem of adjusting the provisioned capacity according to the workload patterns. You still need to manually or automatically scale the capacity of each table based on the actual utilization and demand. This may result in under-provisioning or over-provisioning your tables2.

Option D is incorrect because it suggests changing the capacity mode from provisioned to on-demand. This solution has the following disadvantages:

It may incur higher costs than provisioned capacity mode for predictable workloads. On-demand capacity mode charges for each read and write request you consume, with no minimum capacity required. For predictable workloads, provisioned capacity mode can be more cost-effective than on-demand capacity mode, as you can reserve the capacity you need at a lower rate1.

It may not provide consistent performance during peak usage times, as on-demand capacity mode may take some time to scale up the resources to meet the sudden increase in demand. On-demand capacity mode uses adaptive capacity to handle bursts of traffic, but it may not be able to handle very large spikes or sustained high throughput. In such cases, you may experience throttling or increased latency.

1: Choosing the right DynamoDB capacity mode - Amazon DynamoDB

2: Managing throughput capacity automatically with DynamoDB auto scaling - Amazon DynamoDB

3: Best practices for designing and using partition keys effectively - Amazon DynamoDB

[4]: On-demand mode guidelines - Amazon DynamoDB

[5]: How to optimize Amazon DynamoDB costs - AWS Database Blog

[6]: DynamoDB adaptive capacity: How it works and how it helps - AWS Database Blog

[7]: Amazon DynamoDB pricing - Amazon Web Services (AWS)

The best practice to restrict Amazon S3 access to specific VPCs is to use a bucket policy with a StringEquals or StringLike condition on aws:SourceVpc. This ensures only requests from a specified VPC are allowed.

IAM policies (option C) control who can access the resource but are not suitable alone to restrict by VPC.

Security Groups and NACLs (options B and D) do not apply to Amazon S3 because it is a global service and not VPC-bound.

“You can restrict access to your S3 bucket so that only requests coming from a specific VPC endpoint are allowed.”

Source: AWS Documentation – Amazon S3 Bucket Policies for VPC Endpoints

 Lambda layers are a way to share code and dependencies across multiple Lambda functions. By packaging the custom Python scripts into Lambda layers, the data engineer can update the scripts in one place and have them automatically applied to all the Lambda functions that use the layer. This reduces the manual effort and ensures consistency across the Lambda functions. The other options are either not feasible or not efficient. Storing a pointer to the custom Python scripts in the execution context object or in environment variables would require the Lambda functions to download the scripts from Amazon S3 every time they are invoked, which would increase latency and cost. Assigning the same alias to each Lambda function would not help with updating the Python scripts, as the alias only points to a specific version of the Lambda function code. References:

AWS Lambda layers

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide, Chapter 3: Data Ingestion and Transformation, Section 3.4: AWS Lambda

 The Amazon Redshift Data API is a built-in feature that allows you to run SQL queries on Amazon Redshift data with web services-based applications, such as AWS Lambda, Amazon SageMaker notebooks, and AWS Cloud9. The Data API does not require a persistent connection to your database, and it provides a secure HTTP endpoint and integration with AWS SDKs. You can use the endpoint to run SQL statements without managing connections. The Data API also supports both Amazon Redshift provisioned clusters and Redshift Serverless workgroups. The Data API is the best solution for running real-time queries on the financial data from within the trading application, as it has the least operational overhead compared to the other options.

Option A is not the best solution, as establishing WebSocket connections to Amazon Redshift would require more configuration and maintenance than using the Data API. WebSocket connections are also not supported by Amazon Redshift clusters or serverless workgroups.

Option C is not the best solution, as setting up JDBC connections to Amazon Redshift would also require more configuration and maintenance than using the Data API. JDBC connections are also not supported by Redshift Serverless workgroups.

Option D is not the best solution, as storing frequently accessed data in Amazon S3 and using Amazon S3 Select to run the queries would introduce additional latency and complexity than using the Data API. Amazon S3 Select is also not optimized for real-time queries, as it scans the entire object before returning the results. References:

Using the Amazon Redshift Data API

Calling the Data API

Amazon Redshift Data API Reference

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide

The company is using a data mesh architecture with AWS Lake Formation for governance and needs to share specific subsets of data with different teams (marketing and compliance) using Amazon Redshift Serverless.

Option A: Create views of the tables that need to be shared. Include only the required columns.Creating views in Amazon Redshift that include only the necessary columns allows for fine-grained access control. This method ensures that each team has access to only the data they are authorized to view.

Option E: Share the Amazon Redshift data share to the Amazon Redshift Serverless workgroup in the marketing team ' s account.Amazon Redshift data sharing enables live access to data across Redshift clusters or Serverless workgroups. By sharing data with specific workgroups, you can ensure that the marketing team and compliance team each access the relevant subset of data based on the views created.

Option B (creating a Redshift data share) is close but does not address the fine-grained column-level access.

Option C (creating a managed VPC endpoint) is unnecessary for sharing data with specific teams.

Option D (sharing with the Lake Formation catalog) is incorrect because Redshift data shares do not integrate directly with Lake Formation catalogs; they are specific to Redshift workgroups.

Option B is correct because the requirement is to retain a very large dataset indefinitely and analyze it from Amazon Redshift in the most cost-effective way. Amazon Redshift Spectrum allows Redshift to query data directly in Amazon S3 without loading all of the data into Redshift-managed storage. That reduces warehouse storage cost for long-term retained data. AWS documentation also recommends using Apache Parquet for Spectrum because Parquet is a columnar format, which allows Redshift Spectrum to read only the columns needed instead of scanning entire text files. This improves performance and lowers query cost.

Option A and D are less cost-effective because auto-copy loads data into the Redshift cluster, which means the company pays to store all historical data in Redshift even though the requirement is indefinite retention of a large volume of IoT data. Option C is worse than B because JSON is a row-oriented text format, and AWS guidance says columnar formats such as Parquet or ORC are preferred for Redshift Spectrum for better scan efficiency and lower cost.

AWS Step Functions natively emits state change events to Amazon EventBridge, which can trigger an Amazon SNS notification. This is the most direct and real-time way to alert on success/failure without relying on custom logging or polling.

“Step Functions automatically emits status changes that EventBridge can capture to trigger alerts or workflows. Use EventBridge to invoke an SNS topic for real-time alerts on job status.”

– Ace the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate Certification - version 2 - apple.pdf

This provides real-time alerting and the least operational overhead.

Amazon RDS is a fully managed service that provides relational databases in the cloud. Amazon RDS for MySQL is one of the supported database engines that you can use to run your applications. Amazon RDS provides various features and tools to monitor and optimize the performance of your DB instances, such as Performance Insights, Enhanced Monitoring, CloudWatch metrics and alarms, etc.

Using the Performance Insights feature of Amazon RDS to identify queries that have high CPU utilization and optimizing the problematic queries will help reduce the CPU utilization of the DB instance. Performance Insights is a feature that allows you to analyze the load on your DB instance and determine what is causing performance issues. Performance Insights collects, analyzes, and displays database performance data using an interactive dashboard. You can use Performance Insights to identify the top SQL statements, hosts, users, or processes that are consuming the most CPU resources. You can also drill down into the details of each query and see the execution plan, wait events, locks, etc. By using Performance Insights, you can pinpoint the root cause of the high CPU utilization and optimize the queries accordingly. For example, you can rewrite the queries to make them more efficient, add or remove indexes, use prepared statements, etc.

Implementing caching to reduce the database query load will also help reduce the CPU utilization of the DB instance. Caching is a technique that allows you to store frequently accessed data in a fast and scalable storage layer, such as Amazon ElastiCache. By using caching, you can reduce the number of requests that hit your database, which in turn reduces the CPU load on your DB instance. Caching also improves the performance and availability of your application, as it reduces the latency and increases the throughput of your data access. You can use caching for various scenarios, such as storing session data, user preferences, application configuration, etc. You can also use caching for read-heavy workloads, such as displaying product details, recommendations, reviews, etc.

The other options are not as effective as using Performance Insights and caching. Modifying the database schema to include additional tables and indexes may or may not improve the CPU utilization, depending on the nature of the workload and the queries. Adding more tables and indexes may increase the complexity and overhead of the database, which may negatively affect the performance. Rebooting the RDS DB instance once each week will not reduce the CPU utilization, as it will not address the underlying cause of the high CPU load. Rebooting may also cause downtime and disruption to your application. Upgrading to a larger instance size may reduce the CPU utilization, but it will also increase the cost and complexity of your solution. Upgrading may also not be necessary if you can optimize the queries and reduce the database load by using caching. References:

Amazon RDS

Performance Insights

Amazon ElastiCache

[AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide], Chapter 3: Data Storage and Management, Section 3.1: Amazon RDS

The correct answer is D: Enable native Amazon RDS database audit logging with CloudWatch and CloudTrail integration.

Native RDS database audit logging captures SQL-level activities, including which user is modifying data, which is essential for meeting audit requirements.

Amazon CloudWatch Logs can be used to centralize and store logs.

CloudTrail logs API calls related to instance-level changes, ensuring all modifications are traceable.

This approach provides a comprehensive audit trail and supports compliance with security governance policies.

“Enable and configure native Amazon RDS database audit logging. Enable Amazon CloudWatch Logs. Configure metric filters and alarms. Configure AWS CloudTrail audit logging.”

Problem Analysis:

The company processes 2 GB of daily sales records and 100 GB of Salesforce sales opportunities.

The goal is to analyze and correlate the two datasets with low operational overhead.

The process must run once nightly.

Key Considerations:

Amazon AppFlow simplifies data integration with Salesforce.

AWS Glue can extract data from MySQL and perform ETL operations.

Step Functions can orchestrate workflows with minimal manual intervention.

Apache Airflow and Flink add complexity, which conflicts with the requirement for low operational overhead.

Solution Analysis:

Option A: MWAA + Lambda + Step Functions

Requires custom Lambda code for dataset correlation, increasing development and operational complexity.

Option B: AppFlow + Glue + MWAA

MWAA adds orchestration overhead compared to the simpler Step Functions.

Option C: AppFlow + Glue + Step Functions

AppFlow fetches Salesforce data, Glue extracts MySQL data, and Step Functions orchestrate the entire process.

Minimal setup and operational overhead, making it the best choice.

Option D: AppFlow + Kinesis + Flink + Step Functions

Using Kinesis and Flink for batch processing introduces unnecessary complexity.

Final Recommendation:

Use Amazon AppFlow to fetch Salesforce data, AWS Glue to process MySQL data, and Step Functions for orchestration.

Amazon AppFlow Overview

AWS Glue ETL Documentation

AWS Step Functions

Scheduling an AWS Glue crawler to periodically update the Data Catalog automates the process of detecting new partitions and updating the catalog, which minimizes manual maintenance and operational overhead.

Option A is correct. The MERGE INTO statement is used to conditionally update, insert, or delete rows based on a match condition between a target table and a source table. In this statement, the target table is accounts and the source table is monthly_accounts_update. The join condition is t.customer = s.customer. Because the statement uses WHEN MATCHED THEN DELETE, every row in accounts that has a matching customer value in monthly_accounts_update will be deleted from the target table.

AWS documentation for MERGE INTO states that it conditionally updates, deletes, or inserts rows into an Apache Iceberg table, and the syntax explicitly includes WHEN MATCHED THEN DELETE. AWS Glue guidance and examples for Iceberg also show MERGE INTO as a supported pattern for row-level changes in Glue ETL workflows. This means the syntax is valid for supported Glue-Iceberg use cases, so option D is incorrect. Options B and C are also incorrect because the statement does not retain only matching rows and does not delete the entire table. It deletes only the rows in the target table that satisfy the match condition.

The query editor v2 in Amazon Redshift is a web-based tool that allows users to run SQL queries and scripts on Amazon Redshift clusters. The query editor v2 supports creating and managing materialized views, which are precomputed results of a query that can improve the performance of subsequent queries. The query editor v2 also supports scheduling queries to run at specified intervals, which can be used to refresh materialized views automatically. This solution requires the least effort, as it does not involve any additional services, coding, or configuration. The other solutions are more complex and require more operational overhead. Apache Airflow is an open-source platform for orchestrating workflows, which can be used to refresh materialized views, but it requires setting up and managing an Airflow environment, creating DAGs (directed acyclic graphs) to define the workflows, and integrating with Amazon Redshift. AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that can run code in response to events, which can be used to refresh materialized views, but it requires creating and deploying Lambda functions, defining UDFs within Amazon Redshift, and triggering the functions using events or schedules. AWS Glue is a fully managed ETL service that can run jobs to transform and load data, which can be used to refresh materialized views, but it requires creating and configuring Glue jobs, defining Glue workflows to orchestrate the jobs, and scheduling the workflows using triggers. References:

Query editor V2

Working with materialized views

Scheduling queries

[AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide]

Option D is correct because the problem is lock contention between ETL writes and analytical reads on the same Redshift tables. AWS documents that table locks can block both reads and writes, and that Redshift data sharing lets you share live data across Redshift clusters and workgroups without manually moving or copying the data. Because the shared data is live, consumer users see the most up-to-date information as soon as it is updated. Separating ETL and analytics onto different Redshift clusters while using data sharing is therefore the cleanest way to isolate workloads and still provide consistent data views.

Option A reduces contention only by changing schedules and does not fully solve concurrent peak-hour conflicts. Option B is not correct because Redshift federated queries are read-only against external sources and do not provide a Redshift “read replica” design for this case. Option C does not address the locking problem on the dimension tables that ETL is updating. The official Redshift guidance and service capabilities point to workload isolation plus data sharing as the best fix. This also matches the exam guide’s emphasis on choosing architectures that maintain performance and consistency without unnecessary copying.

Option A is the most cost-effective because it enables seamless integration by allowing analysts to access and join external relational data directly from within Amazon Redshift for reporting, without building and operating a separate ingestion pipeline for a one-time (annual) workload. The study material frames Amazon Redshift as the centralized analytics store for complex queries and reporting, making it the natural place to perform the final transformations and analysis.

The alternatives introduce extra operational steps and recurring costs. Option B requires exporting large historical datasets to S3 and then loading them into Redshift, which increases data movement and operational complexity. Option C adds ETL job development, scheduling, retries, and monitoring overhead that is unnecessary if the primary goal is integrated querying for an annual report. Option D (DMS) is best when you need ongoing migration or continuous replication; it is typically more operationally heavy than needed for “query across sources” use cases and still requires additional setup and maintenance.

Because all databases are already in the same VPC and the analytics platform is Redshift, federated querying provides the most direct, lowest-operations path to integrate and analyze the data where it already needs to be consumed.

Amazon Redshift query performance for large joins depends heavily on data distribution and query optimization. Using the KEY distribution style on both tables ensures that rows with the same join key are co-located on the same compute nodes, minimizing costly data redistribution during joins.

Selecting a high-cardinality column as the distribution key is critical to evenly distribute data across nodes and prevent data skew. Low-cardinality keys can cause hotspots where too much data resides on a small number of nodes, degrading performance.

Using EVEN distribution on the 10-billion-row table and ALL distribution on the 900-million-row table is inefficient because ALL distribution replicates the entire table to every node, which is not appropriate for large datasets. The Amazon Redshift query optimizer operates automatically and does not require manual selection.

Amazon Redshift Advisor analyzes workload patterns and provides actionable recommendations for distribution styles, sort keys, and query optimizations. Using Redshift Advisor allows the data engineer to apply proven optimizations based on actual cluster usage.

Therefore, combining KEY distribution with a high-cardinality join column and leveraging Amazon Redshift Advisor recommendations is the most effective solution to improve query performance.

The Choice state type in AWS Step Functions is designed to perform branching logic, i.e., routing execution to different paths based on conditions in the input data.

“The Step Functions Choice state lets you branch the execution flow depending on values in the state’s input. This allows you to run different processing logic based on dynamic conditions like values in the input JSON.”

– Ace the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate Certification - version 2 - apple.pdf

This makes Choice the correct answer for content-driven conditional workflows.

Option B is correct because CloudWatch Logs subscription filters are the native way to send only matching log events to a downstream destination such as Amazon Data Firehose. AWS states that a subscription filter defines the filter pattern for which log events get delivered and where they are sent. AWS also documents that CloudWatch Logs events can be sent to Firehose by using subscription filters. This directly satisfies the requirement to deliver only relevant logs. Once the logs are in Firehose, AWS documents that Firehose can invoke an AWS Lambda function to transform incoming source data before delivering it to the destination, which satisfies the requirement to deliver the logs in a compatible format for analysis.

Option A is incorrect because S3 bucket rules do not filter CloudWatch log events by timestamp for ingestion control, and using S3 triggers adds unnecessary post-delivery processing. Option C is invalid because the subscription filter applies at the CloudWatch Logs log group, not by “monitoring the Firehose stream.” Option D is incorrect because Firehose does not natively ingest only CloudWatch log groups based on tags or automatically reformat arbitrary logs without a transformation step. The most reliable and AWS-native design is subscription filtering + Firehose + Lambda transformation.

AWS Glue is a fully managed service that provides a serverless data integration platform for data preparation, data cataloging, and data loading. AWS Glue Studio is a graphical interface that allows you to easily author, run, and monitor AWS Glue ETL jobs. AWS Glue Data Quality is a feature that enables you to validate, cleanse, and enrich your data using predefined or custom rules. AWS Step Functions is a service that allows you to coordinate multiple AWS services into serverless workflows.

Using the Detect PII transform in AWS Glue Studio, you can automatically identify and label the PII in your dataset, such as names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, etc. You can then create a rule in AWS Glue Data Quality to obfuscate the PII, such as masking, hashing, or replacing the values with dummy data. You can also use other rules to validate and cleanse your data, such as checking for null values, duplicates, outliers, etc. You can then use an AWS Step Functions state machine to orchestrate a data pipeline to ingest the data into the S3 data lake. You can use AWS Glue DataBrew to visually explore and transform the data, AWS Glue crawlers to discover and catalog the data, and AWS Glue jobs to load the data into the S3 data lake.

This solution will meet the requirement with the least operational effort, as it leverages the serverless and managed capabilities of AWS Glue, AWS Glue Studio, AWS Glue Data Quality, and AWS Step Functions. You do not need to write any code to identify or obfuscate the PII, as you can use the built-in transforms and rules in AWS Glue Studio and AWS Glue Data Quality. You also do not need to provision or manage any servers or clusters, as AWS Glue and AWS Step Functions scale automatically based on the demand.

The other options are not as efficient as using the Detect PII transform in AWS Glue Studio, creating a rule in AWS Glue Data Quality, and using an AWS Step Functions state machine. Using an Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose delivery stream to process the dataset, creating an AWS Lambda transform function to identify the PII, using an AWS SDK to obfuscate the PII, and setting the S3 data lake as the target for the delivery stream will require more operational effort, as you will need to write and maintain code to identify and obfuscate the PII, as well as manage the Lambda function and its resources. Using the Detect PII transform in AWS Glue Studio to identify the PII, obfuscating the PII, and using an AWS Step Functions state machine to orchestrate a data pipeline to ingest the data into the S3 data lake will not be as effective as creating a rule in AWS Glue Data Quality to obfuscate the PII, as you will need to manually obfuscate the PII after identifying it, which can be error-prone and time-consuming. Ingesting the dataset into Amazon DynamoDB, creating an AWS Lambda function to identify and obfuscate the PII in the DynamoDB table and to transform the data, and using the same Lambda function to ingest the data into the S3 data lake will require more operational effort, as you will need to write and maintain code to identify and obfuscate the PII, as well as manage the Lambda function and its resources. You will also incur additional costs and complexity by using DynamoDB as an intermediate data store, which may not be necessary for your use case. References:

AWS Glue

AWS Glue Studio

AWS Glue Data Quality

[AWS Step Functions]

[AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide], Chapter 6: Data Integration and Transformation, Section 6.1: AWS Glue

Creating an EventBridge rule that triggers a Lambda function on AWS Glue job failure events and then sends notifications via Amazon SNS is the most direct and operationally efficient method:

“Practice Quiz 10: A data engineer must monitor the data pipeline... Which solution will meet these requirements?

A. Inspect the job run monitoring section of the AWS Glue console.

Correct Answer: A.”

– Ace the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate Certification - version 2 - apple.pdf

Although this reference directly supports using AWS Glue’s monitoring features via EventBridge, it implies that solutions like A—which directly use EventBridge failure events for automation—are more optimal and less complex than constructing custom logs and metrics.

Option D is correct because Amazon Redshift stored procedures are designed to encapsulate a sequence of SQL statements and business logic inside the database. AWS documentation states that stored procedures are commonly used for data transformation, data validation, and business-specific logic, and that they can combine multiple SQL steps into one procedure. AWS also documents the standard Redshift pattern for deleting stale rows and inserting fresh rows from a staging table, which is exactly the requirement here. Keeping the operation inside Redshift is the most direct way to maintain an up-to-date orders table for downstream consumers.

Option A is incorrect because Redshift Spectrum is for querying external data in S3, not for performing this in-place Redshift table-maintenance pattern. Option B adds unnecessary unload and reload steps, creating delay and operational complexity. Option C is also unsuitable because Athena federated queries are not the right mechanism for transactional maintenance of Redshift tables. The correct DEA-C01-style answer is to use Redshift-native procedural SQL to delete stale rows and insert current rows from staging.

Option C is the correct answer because the Map state is designed to process a collection of data in parallel by applying the same transformation to each element. The Map state can invoke a nested workflow for each element, which can be another state machine or a Lambda function. The Map state will wait until all the parallel executions are completed before moving to the next state.

Option A is incorrect because the Parallel state is used to execute multiple branches of logic concurrently, not to process a collection of data. The Parallel state can have different branches with different logic and states, whereas the Map state has only one branch that is applied to each element of the collection.

Option B is incorrect because the Choice state is used to make decisions based on a comparison of a value to a set of rules. The Choice state does not process any data or invoke any nested workflows.

Option D is incorrect because the Wait state is used to delay the state machine from continuing for a specified time. The Wait state does not process any data or invoke any nested workflows.

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide, Chapter 5: Data Orchestration, Section 5.3: AWS Step Functions, Pages 131-132

Building Batch Data Analytics Solutions on AWS, Module 5: Data Orchestration, Lesson 5.2: AWS Step Functions, Pages 9-10

AWS Documentation Overview, AWS Step Functions Developer Guide, Step Functions Concepts, State Types, Map State, Pages 1-3

The optimal solution for near-real-time querying and visualization of logs is to integrate Amazon CloudWatch Logs with Amazon OpenSearch Service using subscription filters, which stream the logs directly into OpenSearch for querying and dashboarding:

“Use OpenSearch Service with CloudWatch Logs and create a subscription filter to stream log data in near real time into OpenSearch. Then use OpenSearch dashboards for visualization.”

– Ace the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate Certification - version 2 - apple.pdf

This approach offers low latency and avoids batch exports, unlike the scheduled Athena + S3 pattern.

AWS Glue ETL is designed for scalable and serverless data processing, and it supports integrated quality enforcement using AWS Glue Data Quality, which makes it the most cost-effective and integrated option when combined with Amazon RDS for MySQL as the relational database.

“AWS Glue can perform data validation as part of the ETL process, ensuring data quality before storing the data in the target data store.”

– Ace the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate Certification - version 2 - apple.pdf

Using AWS Glue Data Quality directly in the ETL workflow is simpler and more cost-effective than separating transformation (Glue) and validation (DataBrew) into different services.

Option B is correct because Amazon MSK Replicator is the AWS-managed feature specifically designed to reliably replicate data across Amazon MSK clusters in different AWS Regions. AWS states that MSK Replicator can be used to build regionally resilient streaming applications for availability and business continuity, which directly supports the disaster recovery requirement. It is also the choice with the least operational effort because it avoids deploying and managing self-hosted replication tools such as Kafka Connect or MirrorMaker 2. AWS documentation for cross-Region setup also shows support for secure connectivity and notes that MSK environments support IAM, TLS, and SASL/SCRAM authentication schemes for private connectivity scenarios.

Option A and C would require the company to deploy, scale, patch, and monitor custom replication infrastructure in every Region, which increases operational overhead. Option D is not appropriate because Kinesis Data Firehose is not the native service for replicating data between MSK clusters. For ordering and consistency, Kafka-based replication preserves partitioned stream semantics better than mixing in a different streaming service. Therefore, a mesh of MSK Replicator relationships between regional MSK clusters is the best AWS-native answer for near real-time, encrypted, cross-Region replication with minimal administration.

 AWS Glue is a fully managed service that provides a serverless data integration platform. It can automatically discover and categorize data from various sources, including SAP HANA, Microsoft SQL Server, MongoDB, Apache Kafka, and Amazon DynamoDB. It can also infer the schema of the data and store it in the AWS Glue Data Catalog, which is a central metadata repository. AWS Glue can then use the schema information to generate and run Apache Spark code to extract, transform, and load the data into an Amazon S3 bucket. AWS Glue can also monitor and optimize the performance and cost of the data pipeline, and handle any schema changes that may occur in the source data. AWS Glue can meet the SLA of loading the data into the S3 bucket within 15 minutes of data creation, as it can trigger the data pipeline based on events, schedules, or on-demand. AWS Glue has the least operational overhead among the options, as it does not require provisioning, configuring, or managing any servers or clusters. It also handles scaling, patching, and security automatically. References:

AWS Glue

[AWS Glue Data Catalog]

[AWS Glue Developer Guide]

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide

AWS Step Functions is a fully managed, serverless orchestration service designed to coordinate multiple AWS services into reliable workflows. Step Functions natively provide automatic retries, error handling, state-level visibility, and execution history, which directly satisfy the requirements for retry logic and monitoring individual pipeline stages.

In this solution, AWS Lambda functions are used for batch data ingestion, AWS Glue jobs handle transformation, and Amazon S3 is used for storage. Step Functions orchestrate these stages while maintaining clear separation of responsibilities. Each step can be configured with retry and catch policies, allowing the workflow to automatically recover from transient failures without manual intervention.

Chaining AWS Glue jobs alone does not provide detailed stage-level visibility or flexible retry control, and setting MaxRetries to 0 contradicts the retry requirement. EventBridge-based pipelines lack native workflow state tracking. Amazon MWAA introduces unnecessary operational overhead, including environment management and Airflow maintenance.

Therefore, using AWS Step Functions to orchestrate Lambda and Glue provides the most scalable, observable, and low-maintenance solution.

When AWS Glue jobs run inside a private subnet, they must use secure and supported methods to access external databases. AWS Glue supports JDBC connections to on-premises databases, but best practices require secure credential management and explicit driver configuration.

Using a JDBC driver stored in Amazon S3 allows Glue to connect to PostgreSQL without relying on default drivers. Storing credentials in AWS Secrets Manager eliminates hard-coded credentials and enables secure rotation, aligning with AWS security best practices.

Simply specifying credentials inline is less secure and not recommended. SASL connections are not supported for PostgreSQL JDBC connections. Security groups alone do not establish connectivity or authentication.

Therefore, Option D is the correct and production-grade solution.

To achieve the most cost-effective storage solution, the data engineer needs to use an S3 Lifecycle policy that transitions objects to lower-cost storage classes based on their access patterns, and deletes them when they are no longer needed. The storage classes should also provide high availability, which means they should be resilient to the loss of data in a single Availability Zone1. Therefore, the solution must include the following steps:

Transition objects to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) after 6 months. S3 Standard-IA is designed for data that is accessed less frequently, but requires rapid access when needed. It offers the same high durability, throughput, and low latency as S3 Standard, but with a lower storage cost and a retrieval fee2. Therefore, it is suitable for data files that are accessed once or twice each month. S3 Standard-IA also provides high availability, as it stores data redundantly across multiple Availability Zones1.

Transfer objects to S3 Glacier Deep Archive after 2 years. S3 Glacier Deep Archive is the lowest-cost storage class that offers secure and durable storage for data that is rarely accessed and can tolerate a 12-hour retrieval time. It is ideal for long-term archiving and digital preservation3. Therefore, it is suitable for data files that are accessed only once or twice each year. S3 Glacier Deep Archive also provides high availability, as it stores data across at least three geographically dispersed Availability Zones1.

Delete objects when they are no longer needed. The data engineer can specify an expiration action in the S3 Lifecycle policy to delete objects after a certain period of time. This will reduce the storage cost and comply with any data retention policies.

Option C is the only solution that includes all these steps. Therefore, option C is the correct answer.

Option A is incorrect because it transitions objects to S3 One Zone-Infrequent Access (S3 One Zone-IA) after 6 months. S3 One Zone-IA is similar to S3 Standard-IA, but it stores data in a single Availability Zone. This means it has a lower availability and durability than S3 Standard-IA, and it is not resilient to the loss of data in a single Availability Zone1. Therefore, it does not provide high availability as required.

Option B is incorrect because it transfers objects to S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval after 2 years. S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval is a storage class that offers secure and durable storage for data that is accessed infrequently and can tolerate a retrieval time of minutes to hours. It is more expensive than S3 Glacier Deep Archive, and it is not suitable for data that is accessed only once or twice each year3. Therefore, it is not the most cost-effective option.

Option D is incorrect because it combines the errors of option A and B. It transitions objects to S3 One Zone-IA after 6 months, which does not provide high availability, and it transfers objects to S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval after 2 years, which is not the most cost-effective option.

1: Amazon S3 storage classes - Amazon Simple Storage Service

2: Amazon S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) - Amazon Simple Storage Service

3: Amazon S3 Glacier and S3 Glacier Deep Archive - Amazon Simple Storage Service

[4]: Expiring objects - Amazon Simple Storage Service

[5]: Managing your storage lifecycle - Amazon Simple Storage Service

[6]: Examples of S3 Lifecycle configuration - Amazon Simple Storage Service

[7]: Amazon S3 Lifecycle further optimizes storage cost savings with new features - What’s New with AWS

AWS Step Functions is a service that allows you to coordinate multiple AWS services into serverless workflows. You can use Step Functions to create state machines that define the sequence and logic of the tasks in your workflow. Step Functions supports various types of tasks, such as Lambda functions, AWS Glue jobs, Amazon EMR clusters, Amazon ECS tasks, etc. You can use Step Functions to monitor and troubleshoot your workflows, as well as to handle errors and retries.

Using an AWS Step Functions workflow that includes a state machine to run the Lambda function and then the AWS Glue job will meet the requirements with the least management overhead, as it leverages the serverless and managed capabilities of Step Functions. You do not need to write any code to orchestrate the tasks in your workflow, as you can use the Step Functions console or the AWS Serverless Application Model (AWS SAM) to define and deploy your state machine. You also do not need to provision or manage any servers or clusters, as Step Functions scales automatically based on the demand.

The other options are not as efficient as using an AWS Step Functions workflow. Using an Apache Airflow workflow that is deployed on an Amazon EC2 instance or on Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) will require more management overhead, as you will need to provision, configure, and maintain the EC2 instance or the EKS cluster, as well as the Airflow components. You will also need to write and maintain the Airflow DAGs to orchestrate the tasks in your workflow. Using an AWS Glue workflow to run the Lambda function and then the AWS Glue job will not work, as AWS Glue workflows only support AWS Glue jobs and crawlers as tasks, not Lambda functions. References:

AWS Step Functions

AWS Glue

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide, Chapter 6: Data Integration and Transformation, Section 6.3: AWS Step Functions

The company needs to use machine learning models for real-time inventory recommendations and future inventory predictions while leveraging both Amazon Redshift and Amazon SageMaker.

Option A: Use Amazon Redshift ML to generate inventory recommendations.Amazon Redshift ML allows you to build, train, and deploy machine learning models directly from Redshift using SQL statements. It integrates with SageMaker to train models and run inference. This feature is useful for generating inventory recommendations directly from the data stored in Redshift.

Option B: Use SQL to invoke a remote SageMaker endpoint for prediction.You can use SQL in Redshift to call a SageMaker endpoint for real-time inference. By invoking a SageMaker endpoint from within Redshift, the company can get real-time predictions on inventory, allowing for integration between the data warehouse and the machine learning model hosted in SageMaker.

Option C (offline model training) and Option D (creating dashboards with SageMaker Autopilot) are not relevant to the real-time prediction and recommendation requirements.

Option E (archiving inventory reports in Redshift) is not related to making predictions or recommendations.

AWS Glue workflows are designed to orchestrate the ETL pipeline, and you can create data quality checks to ensure the uploaded datasets are complete before running reports. If there is an issue with the data, AWS Glue workflows can trigger an Amazon EventBridge event that sends a message to an SNS topic.

AWS Glue Workflows:

AWS Glue workflows allow users to automate and monitor complex ETL processes. You can include data quality actions to check for null values, data types, and other consistency checks.

In the event of incomplete data, an EventBridge event can be generated to notify via SNS.

Problem Analysis:

The company requires a centralized data warehouse for consolidating data from various sources.

They use Amazon QuickSight in direct query mode, necessitating fast response times for analytical queries.

Users query the data intermittently, with unpredictable spikes during the day.

Operational overhead should be minimal.

Key Considerations:

The solution must support fast, SQL-based analytics.

It must handle unpredictable spikes efficiently.

Must integrate seamlessly with QuickSight for direct querying.

Minimize operational complexity and scaling concerns.

Solution Analysis:

Option A: Amazon Redshift Serverless

Redshift Serverless eliminates the need for provisioning and managing clusters.

Automatically scales compute capacity up or down based on query demand.

Reduces operational overhead by handling performance optimization.

Fully integrates with Amazon QuickSight, ensuring low-latency analytics.

Reduces costs as it charges only for usage, making it ideal for workloads with intermittent spikes.

Option B: Amazon Athena with S3 (Apache Parquet)

Athena supports querying data directly from S3 in Parquet format.

While it’s cost-effective, performance depends on the size and complexity of the data.

It is not optimized for high-speed analytics needed by QuickSight in direct query mode.

Option C: Amazon Redshift Provisioned Clusters

Requires manual cluster provisioning, scaling, and maintenance.

Higher operational overhead compared to Redshift Serverless.

Option D: Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL

Aurora is optimized for transactional databases, not data warehousing or analytics.

Does not meet the requirement for fast analytics queries.

Final Recommendation:

Amazon Redshift Serverless is the best choice for this use case because it provides fast analytics, integrates natively with QuickSight, and minimizes operational complexity while efficiently handling unpredictable spikes.

Amazon Redshift Serverless Overview

Amazon QuickSight and Redshift Integration

Athena vs. Redshift

The most cost-effective solution in this case is to apply a lifecycle policy to transition records to Amazon S3 Standard-IA storage after 30 days. Here’s why:

Amazon S3 Lifecycle Policies: Amazon S3 offers lifecycle policies that allow you to automatically transition objects between different storage classes to optimize costs. For data that is frequently accessed in the first 30 days and infrequently accessed after that, transitioning from the S3 Standard storage class to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) after 30 days makes the most sense. S3 Standard-IA is designed for data that is accessed less frequently but still needs to be retained, offering lower storage costs than S3 Standard with a retrieval cost for access.

Cost Optimization: S3 Standard-IA offers a lower price per GB than S3 Standard. Since the data will be accessed infrequently after 30 days, using S3 Standard-IA will lower storage costs while still allowing for immediate retrieval when necessary.

Compliance with Regulations: Since the records need to be immediately accessible for the first 30 days, the use of S3 Standard for that period ensures compliance with regulatory requirements. After 30 days, transitioning to S3 Standard-IA continues to meet access requirements for infrequent access while reducing storage costs.

Alternatives Considered:

Option B (S3 Intelligent-Tiering): While S3 Intelligent-Tiering automatically moves data between access tiers based on access patterns, it incurs a small monthly monitoring and automation charge per object. It could be a viable option, but transitioning data to S3 Standard-IA directly would be more cost-effective since the pattern of access is well-known (frequent for 30 days, infrequent thereafter).

Option C (S3 Glacier Deep Archive): Glacier Deep Archive is the lowest-cost storage class, but it is not suitable in this case because the data needs to be accessed immediately within 30 days and on an infrequent basis thereafter. Glacier Deep Archive requires hours for data retrieval, which is not acceptable for infrequent access needs.

Option D (S3 Standard-IA for all records): Using S3 Standard-IA for all records would result in higher costs for the first 30 days, as the data is frequently accessed. S3 Standard-IA incurs retrieval charges, making it less suitable for frequently accessed data.

Amazon S3 Lifecycle Policies

S3 Storage Classes

Cost Management and Data Optimization Using Lifecycle Policies

AWS Data Engineering Documentation

AWS Glue Data Quality is designed specifically to validate data as part of ETL pipelines with minimal cost and operational overhead. By creating a custom data quality rule, the data engineer can enforce business logic such as ensuring that the shipping date is later than the order date and that the delivery date is later than the shipping date.

Glue Data Quality rules run natively within AWS Glue ETL jobs, eliminating the need for additional services, duplicate queries, or post-processing steps. The service supports automatically identifying failed records and routing them to a separate Amazon S3 bucket, which directly satisfies the requirement to isolate invalid orders.

Using AWS Glue DataBrew introduces additional profiling and transformation steps that are unnecessary for a simple rule-based validation. Athena-based validation would require scanning data repeatedly, increasing query costs and adding complexity. AWS Glue crawlers only discover schema metadata and cannot enforce data quality rules.

From a cost and architecture perspective, Glue Data Quality integrates directly into existing Glue pipelines, avoids additional compute usage, and provides centralized monitoring of data quality metrics. Therefore, Option C is the most cost-effective and exam-aligned solution.

Option A is correct because Amazon Redshift supports the EXCLUDE clause in the SELECT list for exactly this use case: returning all columns from a wide table except a small set of unwanted columns. AWS documentation states that “EXCLUDE column_list names the columns that are excluded from the query results” and notes that the option is helpful when only a subset of columns must be excluded from a wide table. That matches this question precisely because the table contains 100 columns and only company_id and unique_system_id need to be omitted.

Option B is invalid SQL syntax in Amazon Redshift because NOT IN is used in predicates, not in the select list to remove columns. Option C is also incorrect because EXCEPT in Redshift is a set operator used between query result sets, not a select-list column exclusion feature. AWS documents EXCEPT alongside UNION and INTERSECT as result-set comparison operators, not as a way to omit columns from SELECT *. Option D is not valid Redshift SQL syntax for column selection. Therefore, the correct and documented Redshift statement is SELECT * EXCLUDE company_id, unique_system_id FROM orders.complete_orders_history;

AWS Glue workflows are a feature of AWS Glue that enable you to create and visualize complex ETL pipelines using AWS Glue components, such as crawlers, jobs, triggers, and development endpoints. AWS Glue workflows provide automated orchestration and require minimal manual effort, as they handle dependency resolution, error handling, state management, and resource allocation for your ETL workflows. You can use AWS Glue workflows to ingest data from your operational databases into your Amazon S3 based data lake, and then use AWS Glue and Amazon EMR to process the data in the data lake. This solution will meet the requirements with the least operational overhead, as it leverages the serverless and fully managed nature of AWS Glue, and the scalability and flexibility of Amazon EMR12.

The other options are not optimal for the following reasons:

B. AWS Step Functions tasks. AWS Step Functions is a service that lets you coordinate multiple AWS services into serverless workflows. You can use AWS Step Functions tasks to invoke AWS Glue and Amazon EMR jobs as part of your ETL workflows, and use AWS Step Functions state machines to define the logic and flow of your workflows. However, this option would require more manual effort than AWS Glue workflows, as you would need to write JSON code to define your state machines, handle errors and retries, and monitor the execution history and status of your workflows3.

C. AWS Lambda functions. AWS Lambda is a service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers. You can use AWS Lambda functions to trigger AWS Glue and Amazon EMR jobs as part of your ETL workflows, and use AWS Lambda event sources and destinations to orchestrate the flow of your workflows. However, this option would also require more manual effort than AWS Glue workflows, as you would need to write code to implement your business logic, handle errors and retries, and monitor the invocation and execution of your Lambda functions. Moreover, AWS Lambda functions have limitations on the execution time, memory, and concurrency, which may affect the performance and scalability of your ETL workflows.

D. Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow (Amazon MWAA) workflows. Amazon MWAA is a managed service that makes it easy to run open source Apache Airflow on AWS. Apache Airflow is a popular tool for creating and managing complex ETL pipelines using directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). You can use Amazon MWAA workflows to orchestrate AWS Glue and Amazon EMR jobs as part of your ETL workflows, and use the Airflow web interface to visualize and monitor your workflows. However, this option would have more operational overhead than AWS Glue workflows, as you would need to set up and configure your Amazon MWAA environment, write Python code to define your DAGs, and manage the dependencies and versions of your Airflow plugins and operators.

1: AWS Glue Workflows

2: AWS Glue and Amazon EMR

3: AWS Step Functions

AWS Lambda

Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow

This solution will meet the requirements with the lowest latency because it uses Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink to process the sensor data in real time and write it to Amazon Timestream, a fast, scalable, and serverless time series database. Amazon Timestream is optimized for storing and analyzing time series data, such as sensor data, and can handle trillions of events per day with millisecond latency. By using Amazon Timestream as a source, you can create an Amazon QuickSight dashboard that displays a real-time view of operational efficiency on a large screen in the manufacturing facility. Amazon QuickSight is a fully managed business intelligence service that can connect to various data sources, including Amazon Timestream, and provide interactive visualizations and insights123.

The other options are not optimal for the following reasons:

A. Use Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink (previously known as Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics) to process the sensor data. Use a connector for Apache Flink to write data to an Amazon Timestream database. Use the Timestream database as a source to create a Grafana dashboard. This option is similar to option C, but it uses Grafana instead of Amazon QuickSight to create the dashboard. Grafana is an open source visualization tool that can also connect to Amazon Timestream, but it requires additional steps to set up and configure, such as deploying a Grafana server on Amazon EC2, installing the Amazon Timestream plugin, and creating an IAM role for Grafana to access Timestream. These steps can increase the latency and complexity of the solution.

B. Configure the S3 bucket to send a notification to an AWS Lambda function when any new object is created. Use the Lambda function to publish the data to Amazon Aurora. Use Aurora as a source to create an Amazon QuickSight dashboard. This option is not suitable for displaying a real-time view of operational efficiency, as it introduces unnecessary delays and costs in the data pipeline. First, the sensor data is written to an S3 bucket by Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose, which can have a buffering interval of up to 900 seconds. Then, the S3 bucket sends a notification to a Lambda function, which can incur additional invocation and execution time. Finally, the Lambda function publishes the data to Amazon Aurora, a relational database that is not optimized for time series data and can have higher storage and performance costs than Amazon Timestream .

D. Use AWS Glue bookmarks to read sensor data from the S3 bucket in real time. Publish the data to an Amazon Timestream database. Use the Timestream database as a source to create a Grafana dashboard. This option is also not suitable for displaying a real-time view of operational efficiency, as it uses AWS Glue bookmarks to read sensor data from the S3 bucket. AWS Glue bookmarks are a feature that helps AWS Glue jobs and crawlers keep track of the data that has already been processed, so that they can resume from where they left off. However, AWS Glue jobs and crawlers are not designed for real-time data processing, as they can have a minimum frequency of 5 minutes and a variable start-up time. Moreover, this option also uses Grafana instead of Amazon QuickSight to create the dashboard, which can increase the latency and complexity of the solution .

1: Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Flink

2: Amazon Timestream

3: Amazon QuickSight

Analyze data in Amazon Timestream using Grafana

Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose

Amazon Aurora

AWS Glue Bookmarks

AWS Glue Job and Crawler Scheduling

To address the requirement of masking PII data and ensuring secure access throughout the data pipeline, the combination of AWS Glue DataBrew and IAM provides a low-maintenance solution.

A. AWS Glue DataBrew for Masking:

AWS Glue DataBrew provides a visual tool to perform data transformations, including masking PII data. It allows for easy configuration of data transformation tasks without requiring manual coding, making it ideal for this use case.

The best solution to meet the requirements of giving data scientists the ability to query all data sources by using syntax similar to SQL with the least operational overhead is to use AWS Glue to crawl the data sources, store metadata in the AWS Glue Data Catalog, use Amazon Athena to query the data, use SQL for structured data sources, and use PartiQL for data that is stored in JSON format.

AWS Glue is a serverless data integration service that makes it easy to prepare, clean, enrich, and move data between data stores1. AWS Glue crawlers are processes that connect to a data store, progress through a prioritized list of classifiers to determine the schema for your data, and then create metadata tables in the Data Catalog2. The Data Catalog is a persistent metadata store that contains table definitions, job definitions, and other control information to help you manage your AWS Glue components3. You can use AWS Glue to crawl the data sources, such as Amazon S3, Amazon RDS for Microsoft SQL Server, and Amazon DynamoDB, and store the metadata in the Data Catalog.

Amazon Athena is a serverless, interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data directly in Amazon S3 using standard SQL or Python4. Amazon Athena also supports PartiQL, a SQL-compatible query language that lets you query, insert, update, and delete data from semi-structured and nested data, such as JSON. You can use Amazon Athena to query the data from the Data Catalog using SQL for structured data sources, such as .csv files and relational databases, and PartiQL for data that is stored in JSON format. You can also use Athena to query data from other data sources, such as Amazon Redshift, using federated queries.

Using AWS Glue and Amazon Athena to query all data sources by using syntax similar to SQL is the least operational overhead solution, as you do not need to provision, manage, or scale any infrastructure, and you pay only for the resources you use. AWS Glue charges you based on the compute time and the data processed by your crawlers and ETL jobs1. Amazon Athena charges you based on the amount of data scanned by your queries. You can also reduce the cost and improve the performance of your queries by using compression, partitioning, and columnar formats for your data in Amazon S3.

Option B is not the best solution, as using AWS Glue to crawl the data sources, store metadata in the AWS Glue Data Catalog, and use Redshift Spectrum to query the data, would incur more costs and complexity than using Amazon Athena. Redshift Spectrum is a feature of Amazon Redshift, a fully managed data warehouse service, that allows you to query and join data across your data warehouse and your data lake using standard SQL. While Redshift Spectrum is powerful and useful for many data warehousing scenarios, it is not necessary or cost-effective for querying all data sources by using syntax similar to SQL. Redshift Spectrum charges you based on the amount of data scanned by your queries, which is similar to Amazon Athena, but it also requires you to have an Amazon Redshift cluster, which charges you based on the node type, the number of nodes, and the duration of the cluster5. These costs can add up quickly, especially if you have large volumes of data and complex queries. Moreover, using Redshift Spectrum would introduce additional latency and complexity, as you would have to provision and manage the cluster, and create an external schema and database for the data in the Data Catalog, instead of querying it directly from Amazon Athena.

Option C is not the best solution, as using AWS Glue to crawl the data sources, store metadata in the AWS Glue Data Catalog, use AWS Glue jobs to transform data that is in JSON format to Apache Parquet or .csv format, store the transformed data in an S3 bucket, and use Amazon Athena to query the original and transformed data from the S3 bucket, would incur more costs and complexity than using Amazon Athena with PartiQL. AWS Glue jobs are ETL scripts that you can write in Python or Scala to transform your data and load it to your target data store. Apache Parquet is a columnar storage format that can improve the performance of analytical queries by reducing the amount of data that needs to be scanned and providing efficient compression and encoding schemes6. While using AWS Glue jobs and Parquet can improve the performance and reduce the cost of your queries, they would also increase the complexity and the operational overhead of the data pipeline, as you would have to write, run, and monitor the ETL jobs, and store the transformed data in a separate location in Amazon S3. Moreover, using AWS Glue jobs and Parquet would introduce additional latency, as you would have to wait for the ETL jobs to finish before querying the transformed data.

Option D is not the best solution, as using AWS Lake Formation to create a data lake, use Lake Formation jobs to transform the data from all data sources to Apache Parquet format, store the transformed data in an S3 bucket, and use Amazon Athena or Redshift Spectrum to query the data, would incur more costs and complexity than using Amazon Athena with PartiQL. AWS Lake Formation is a service that helps you centrally govern, secure, and globally share data for analytics and machine learning7. Lake Formation jobs are ETL jobs that you can create and run using the Lake Formation console or API. While using Lake Formation and Parquet can improve the performance and reduce the cost of your queries, they would also increase the complexity and the operational overhead of the data pipeline, as you would have to create, run, and monitor the Lake Formation jobs, and store the transformed data in a separate location in Amazon S3. Moreover, using Lake Formation and Parquet would introduce additional latency, as you would have to wait for the Lake Formation jobs to finish before querying the transformed data. Furthermore, using Redshift Spectrum to query the data would also incur the same costs and complexity as mentioned in option B. References:

What is Amazon Athena?

Data Catalog and crawlers in AWS Glue

AWS Glue Data Catalog

Columnar Storage Formats

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide

AWS Glue Schema Registry

What is AWS Glue?

Amazon Redshift Serverless

Amazon Redshift provisioned clusters

[Querying external data using Amazon Redshift Spectrum]

[Using stored procedures in Amazon Redshift]

[What is AWS Lambda?]

[PartiQL for Amazon Athena]

[Federated queries in Amazon Athena]

[Amazon Athena pricing]

[Top 10 performance tuning tips for Amazon Athena]

[AWS Glue ETL jobs]

[AWS Lake Formation jobs]

Option C (LAC-A) is the correct choice because the requirement is to always show the Region-level total even when the visual is drilled down into lower levels (for example, country → city → store). A simple calculated field (Option B) is computed at the row level and then aggregated by the visual, so it will change as the drill-down changes the grain. A table calculation (Option A) is evaluated based on the current visual layout and can vary with the fields placed in the visual, which makes it unreliable for enforcing a fixed “Region total regardless of drill-down.”

A level-aware calculation (aggregate) is specifically intended to “lock” an aggregation to a chosen dimensional level (here: Region). That means you can compute revenue aggregated at the Region level and reuse that value across lower drill levels without it recalculating at city/store granularity. A window LAC (LAC-W) is primarily for windowed analytics (running totals, period-over-period, rank, moving averages) over a partition/order, not for enforcing a fixed dimensional aggregation level. Therefore, LAC-A best matches the requirement.