PDI Platform Developer I (WI24) Questions and Answers

 To override the Contact’s Edit button and provide custom user interfaces in both Salesforce Classic and Lightning Experience, the developer should use a Visualforce page in Salesforce Classic and a Lightning component in Lightning Experience. This is because Visualforce pages are supported as overrides in Salesforce Classic, but not in Lightning Experience or mobile. On the other hand, Lightning components are supported as overrides in Lightning Experience and mobile, but not in Salesforce Classic. Therefore, the developer needs to use different technologies for different user interfaces. The developer can specify the override type and the page or component to use for each user interface in the Buttons, Links, and Actions settings of the Contact object. References: Override Standard Buttons and Tab Home Pages, Standard Actions and Overrides Basics, Override Buttons, Links, and Tabs with Visualforce

The  component displays all messages that were generated for all components on the current page, using the ApexPages.addMessage() method. This component should be used to display messages on a Visualforce page that uses a custom controller or controller extension1. The other options are either incorrect or incomplete, as they only display a single message or require additional attributes2. References:

• ApexPages Class | Apex Reference Guide | Salesforce Developers
• Visualforce Developer Guide | Salesforce Developers

The best technique to streamline the data upload is to update the primaryid__c field definition to mark it as an External Id. An external ID is a custom field that has the “External ID” attribute, meaning that it contains unique record identifiers from a system outside of Salesforce. When you select this option, the field becomes searchable in Salesforce and you can use it to integrate with external systems and import data more efficiently1. By marking the primaryid__c field as an external ID, the developer can use it to match the records in the CSV file with the existing records in the candidate_c object, without creating duplicates or errors2.

References:

• 1: Create an External ID Field
• 2: Import Data with External IDs

The correct answer is D because the Model-View-Controller (MVC) design framework is a best practice for developing scalable and maintainable applications on the Salesforce platform. The MVC framework separates the application logic into three layers: the model, which represents the data and business logic; the view, which displays the user interface and user interactions; and the controller, which mediates the communication between the model and the view. By using the MVC framework, developers can modularize their code, reuse components, and avoid tight coupling between layers. The other options are incorrect because they are not design frameworks, but rather development methodologies or architectures. Flux is an architecture for building user interfaces with React, a JavaScript library. Waterfall and Agile are methodologies for managing software development projects, with different approaches to planning, testing, and delivering software. References:

• Apex Developer Guide: MVC Architecture
• Trailhead: Apex Basics for .NET Developers
• Trailhead: Platform Developer I Certification Study Guide

The most efficient way to ensure that the TotalJobs__c field on Account is kept up to date is to change it to a roll-up summary field. A roll-up summary field calculates values from related records, such as those in a related list1. In this case, the roll-up summary field on the Account object would count the number of ServiceJob__c records that are related to the Account via the partner_Service_Provider__c Lookup field. This is the simplest and most declarative way to achieve the requirement.

The other options are not valid because:

• Creating a record-triggered flow on ServiceJob__c would require more steps and logic than a roll-up summary field. A record-triggered flow would need to query the related Account record, update the TotalJobs__c field, and handle possible errors2. A record-triggered flow would also consume more system resources and limits than a roll-up summary field.
• Creating an Apex trigger on ServiceJob__c would require more coding and testing than a roll-up summary field. An Apex trigger would need to perform similar operations as a record-triggered flow, but with more complexity and less maintainability3. An Apex trigger would also consume more system resources and limits than a roll-up summary field.
• Creating a schedule-triggered flow on ServiceJob__c would not ensure that the TotalJobs__c field is kept up to date in real time. A schedule-triggered flow runs at a specified time or time interval, which means that the TotalJobs__c field could be outdated between the scheduled runs4. A schedule-triggered flow would also consume more system resources and limits than a roll-up summary field.

References:

• 1: Roll-Up Summary Field - Salesforce
• 2: Update Salesforce Records from a Flow
• 3: Inserting and Updating Records | Apex Developer Guide
• 4: Schedule-Triggered Flows - Salesforce

• Rollup summary fields can cause the parent record to go through Save. This is true because when a child record is created, updated, or deleted, the parent record is also updated to reflect the changes in the rollup summary field. This update can cause the trigger on the parent object to fire again, which can affect the performance and logic of the trigger1.
• The trigger may fire multiple times during a transaction. This is true because triggers can be invoked by other triggers, workflow rules, or processes in the same transaction. This can result in multiple trigger executions for the same record, which can also affect the performance and logic of the trigger2.
• Duplicate rules are executed once all DML operations commit to the database. This is false because duplicate rules are executed before the DML operations are committed to the database. Duplicate rules are part of the validation rules that are run before the triggers3.
• The validation rules will cause the trigger to fire again. This is false because validation rules are run before the triggers, and they do not cause the triggers to fire again. Validation rules only prevent the record from being saved if the validation fails4.

References:

• 1: Roll-Up Summary Fields
• 2: Triggers and Order of Execution
• 3: Duplicate Management
• 4: Validation Rules

The test method fails in the sandbox test framework because it relies on existing data in the sandbox, which may not be consistent or available for the test execution. The Apex test framework uses a separate test data context that is rolled back after the test execution, so any data that is queried or inserted by the test method must be created within the test method or by using the @testSetup annotation. The Execute Anonymous window, on the other hand, runs the Apex logic in the current user context and can access the existing data in the sandbox. Therefore, the Apex logic may succeed in the Execute Anonymous window but fail in the test framework. References:

• Apex Testing (Salesforce Developer Documentation)
• Isolation of Test Data from Organization Data in Unit Tests (Salesforce Developer Documentation)
• Free Salesforce Platform Developer 1 Practice Exam (With Answers) (Salesforce Ben)

The developer should use the lightning-input-field component to support the security requirements. This component respects the field-level security and sharing settings of the Salesforce org, and displays the appropriate data to different types of users. The other components do not have this feature, and may expose sensitive data to unauthorized users. References: Lightning Web Components Developer Guide), Secure Coding Guide)

Component and application events are two types of events that can be used to communicate between components in Lightning. Component events are handled by the component that fired the event or a component in its containment hierarchy. Application events are handled by any component that is listening to the event, regardless of where it is in the DOM1. Some of the best practices when it comes to component and application event handling are:

• Reuse the event logic in a component bundle, by putting the logic in the helper. This practice allows the developer to avoid duplicating code and to maintain consistency and modularity. The helper class can contain common methods that can be invoked by the controller or the renderer of the component2.
• Handle low-level events in the event handler and re-fire them as higher-level events. This practice allows the developer to abstract away the details of the low-level events and provide a more meaningful and relevant event for the consumers. For example, a component can handle a mouse click event and re-fire it as a select event with additional data3.

The other options are not best practices because:

• Use component events to communicate actions that should be handled at the application level. This practice is not recommended, because component events are scoped to the component that fired them or its parents. If the action should be handled by a component that is not in the same containment hierarchy, the component event will not reach it. Application events are more suitable for cross-component communication1.
• Try to use application events as opposed to component events. This practice is not advisable, because application events are broadcast to all components that are listening to them, which can cause performance issues and unwanted side effects. Component events are more efficient and secure, as they are only handled by the relevant components1.

References:

• : Communicating with Events
• : Helper Functions
• : Advanced Events Example

 A developer should use the FIND clause with the IN Name Fields option to obtain the Id and Name of all the Leads, Accounts, and Contacts that have the company name “Universal Containers”. The FIND clause allows you to perform text searches in Salesforce data, similar to searching with a search engine1. The IN Name Fields option specifies that the search should look for matches in the Name fields of the objects2. The RETURNING clause specifies which objects and fields to return in the search results3. The syntax of the FIND clause is as follows:

FIND {searchString} [IN searchGroup] [RETURNING fieldSpec [ORDER BY orderBySpec] [LIMIT limitSpec] [OFFSET offsetSpec]]

For example, the following query returns the Id and Name of all the Leads, Accounts, and Contacts that have the company name “Universal Containers”:

FIND ‘Universal Containers’ IN Name Fields RETURNING lead(id, name), account(id, name), contact(id, name)

Option B is incorrect, because there is no such option as IN CompanyName Fields in the FIND clause. The valid options for the IN clause are ALL FIELDS, NAME FIELDS, EMAIL FIELDS, PHONE FIELDS, and SIDEBAR FIELDS2.

Option C is incorrect, because it is not a valid SOQL query. SOQL stands for Salesforce Object Query Language, which is a different way of querying Salesforce data than the FIND clause. SOQL queries use the SELECT statement to specify the fields and objects to retrieve, and the WHERE clause to filter the records based on certain criteria. However, SOQL queries cannot query multiple objects in a single statement, unless they are related by a relationship. Therefore, the query in option C would result in a syntax error, as it tries to query Lead, Account, and Contact objects in the same statement, without specifying any relationship.

Option D is incorrect, because it is also not a valid SOQL query. Apart from the same issue as option C, it also has a typo in the WHERE clause, as it uses an asterisk (*) instead of an equal sign (=) to compare the CompanyName field with the value “Universal Containers”.

References:

• FIND | SOQL and SOSL Reference | Salesforce Developers
• IN | SOQL and SOSL Reference | Salesforce Developers
• RETURNING | SOQL and SOSL Reference | Salesforce Developers
• [Salesforce Object Query Language (SOQL) | SOQL and SOSL Reference | Salesforce Developers]
• [Relationship Queries | SOQL and SOSL Reference | Salesforce Developers]

The best option to support these requirements is to create a lookup field from Engineering_Support__c to Opportunity. This will allow users to associate multiple Engineering_Support__c records to a single Opportunity record, and also enable the use of roll-up summary fields on the Opportunity object to display aggregate information about the related Engineering_Support__c records. A lookup field creates a relationship that links two objects together, but does not affect record ownership, security, or deletion.

References:

• Custom Objects (1)
• Relationships Among Standard Objects and Fields (2)
• Create Object Relationships (3)

 To implement the total_Hours__c field on the Opportunity object, the developer should use a roll-up summary field on the Opportunity object. A roll-up summary field calculates values from related records, such as those in a related list1. In this case, the roll-up summary field on the Opportunity object would sum up the Number_of_Hours__c values from the Sales_Help_Request__c records that are related to the Opportunity via the Lookup relationship. This is the simplest and most declarative way to achieve the requirement.

The other options are not valid because:

• A roll-up summary field on the Sales_Help_Request__c object would not be able to aggregate the values from the child records to the parent record. A roll-up summary field can only calculate values from the child records to the parent record in a master-detail relationship, not a lookup relationship1.
• A trigger on the Opportunity object would not be able to access the Number_of_Hours__c values from the Sales_Help_Request__c records without performing a SOQL query. A trigger can only access the fields of the records that are being inserted, updated, deleted, or undeleted2. A trigger would also require more coding and testing than a roll-up summary field.
• A record-triggered flow on the Sales_Help_Request__c object would not be able to update the total_Hours__c field on the Opportunity object without performing a SOQL query and a DML operation. A record-triggered flow can only access and update the fields of the record that triggered the flow3. A record-triggered flow would also be more complex and less efficient than a roll-up summary field.

References:

• 1: Roll-Up Summary Field - Salesforce
• 2: Triggers and Order of Execution - Salesforce
• 3: Record-Triggered Flows - Salesforce

 To create a form that will create a record for a custom object, the developer can use a Dynamic Form, which is a Lightning App Builder component that allows you to customize the fields and sections of a record page layout1. A Dynamic Form can also use visibility rules to display different fields based on the user’s profile, role, or other criteria2. To add the functionality to the Account record page, the developer can use a Dynamic Action, which is a way to configure actions on a record page without code3. A Dynamic Action can also use visibility rules to show or hide actions based on the user’s profile, role, or other criteria4. To restrict the functionality to a small group of users, the developer can create a Custom Permission, which is a way to grant access to custom processes or apps5. A Custom Permission can be assigned to a permission set or a profile, and then assigned to the users who need it. References:

• Dynamic Forms | Salesforce Trailhead
• Visibility Rules for Dynamic Forms | Salesforce Help
• Dynamic Actions | Salesforce Trailhead
• Visibility Rules for Dynamic Actions | Salesforce Help
• Custom Permissions | Salesforce Trailhead
• [Assign Custom Permissions | Salesforce Help]

Lightning Data Service is the preferred (and easiest) way to work with Salesforce data. With Lightning Data Service, developers use JavaScript to connect components to Salesforce data1. Lightning Data Service also provides security by making server calls to secure User Interface API endpoints2. Lightning Data Service respects the sharing rules and field-level security of the current user, so developers do not need to write any additional code to enforce them3. The other options are either incorrect or irrelevant for Lightning Data Service. References:

• Lightning Security | Secure Coding Guide | Salesforce Developers
• Considerations | Lightning Aura Components Developer Guide | Salesforce Developers
• Use Lightning Data Service to Work with Data Unit | Salesforce

The correct definition of a Lightning Web Component property that uses the getAccounts method is option C. In Salesforce, the @wire decorator is used to read data from one of the wire adapters built into Lightning Web Components or create a JavaScript property in a Lightning web component. The property is then provisioned with data, error, or both. A provisioned property has a specific shape—data and error properties—designed for working with wire services.

In this case, @wire(getAccounts, { searchTern: '$searchTern' }) accountList; is the correct syntax where:

• getAccounts is the Apex method.
• { searchTern: '$searchTern' } are parameters passed to the Apex method.
• accountList is the JavaScript property that gets assigned the data returned by getAccounts.

References: Lightning Web Components Developer Guide

The TestVisible annotation allows test methods to access private or protected members of another class outside the test class. This way, the developer can write unit tests for a private method in an Apex class without changing the access modifier of the method. The SeeAllData annotation allows test methods to access all data in the organization, including records that are normally hidden from test methods. This is not related to testing private methods. Adding a test method in the Apex class is not a good practice, as it mixes production and test code in the same class. Marking the Apex class as global makes it accessible by any Apex code that has access to the class, not just test methods. This can expose the class to unwanted modifications or invocations. References:

• Apex Developer Guide: Isolation of Test Data from Organization Data in Unit Tests, page 1
• Apex Developer Guide: Testing Best Practices, page 1
• Apex Developer Guide: Annotation TestVisible, page 1
• [Trailhead: Platform Developer I Certification Study Guide: Apex Testing], unit 6

To satisfy this requirement, a developer should use an invocable method. An invocable method is a method that can be called from a flow and can perform complex logic or integrate with an external system. An invocable method can also return data to the flow, such as a list of order numbers and dates. An invocable method can be annotated with @InvocableMethod to make it available in Flow Builder as an Apex action. An Apex controller is used to provide data and logic to a Visualforce page or a Lightning component, not a flow. An Apex REST class is used to expose custom REST API endpoints, not to retrieve data from an external system. An outbound message is used to send notifications to external systems when a certain event occurs in Salesforce, not to display data on a screen. References:

• Call Apex Code from a Flow
• InvocableMethod Annotation
• Free Salesforce Platform Developer 1 Practice Exam (With Answers)

Aura Components and Lightning Web Components are two technologies that are built on a framework that fully supports the business requirement of building a responsive application capable of responding to touch events, that will be executed on stateful clients. Both technologies are part of the Lightning Component Framework, which is a modern UI framework for developing dynamic web apps for mobile and desktop devices. The Lightning Component Framework uses standard web technologies, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and Web Components, to create reusable and interoperable components that can adapt to different screen sizes, devices, and orientations. The framework also provides features such as data binding, event handling, state management, and server-side integration, to enable developers to create rich and interactive user interfaces.

Aura Components are the original technology for creating Lightning components. They use a custom XML-based markup language, Aura, to define the component structure and behavior. Aura Components can respond to touch events using the ui:input component, which provides a generic input element that can handle different input types, such as text, number, date, checkbox, radio, toggle, and email. The ui:input component also supports touch gestures, such as swipe, tap, and pinch, by using the ontouchstart, ontouchend, ontouchmove, and ontouchcancel attributes. Aura Components are stateful, meaning that they maintain their state on the client-side and communicate with the server only when necessary. This reduces the network traffic and improves the performance and user experience.

Lightning Web Components are the newer technology for creating Lightning components. They use standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript to define the component structure and behavior. Lightning Web Components can respond to touch events using the standard HTML input element, which provides a native input element that can handle different input types, such as text, number, date, checkbox, radio, toggle, and email. The input element also supports touch gestures, such as swipe, tap, and pinch, by using the standard touch event listeners, such as touchstart, touchend, touchmove, and touchcancel. Lightning Web Components are also stateful, meaning that they maintain their state on the client-side and communicate with the server only when necessary. This reduces the network traffic and improves the performance and user experience.

Visualforce Components and Visualforce Pages are two technologies that are not built on a framework that fully supports the business requirement of building a responsive application capable of responding to touch events, that will be executed on stateful clients. Visualforce Components are reusable UI elements that can be used in Visualforce Pages. Visualforce Pages are web pages that can display and interact with Salesforce data and logic. Visualforce Components and Pages use a custom XML-based markup language, Visualforce, to define the UI elements and behavior. Visualforce Components and Pages can be made responsive by using the Salesforce Lightning Design System (SLDS), which is a collection of design guidelines, components, and resources that enable developers to create consistent and beautiful user interfaces across devices. However, Visualforce Components and Pages do not have native support for touch events, and require custom JavaScript code to handle them. Visualforce Components and Pages are also stateless, meaning that they do not maintain their state on the client-side and communicate with the server on every request. This increases the network traffic and affects the performance and user experience.

References:

• Lightning Component Framework
• Aura Components Developer Guide
• Lightning Web Components Developer Guide
• Visualforce Developer Guide
• Salesforce Lightning Design System

The correct answer is to move all of the logic to a Queueable class that queries for and updates the Assets and call it from the trigger. This is because when dealing with bulk data, triggers can often hit governor limits. By utilizing a Queueable class, the developer can perform asynchronous processing which helps in handling more records and avoiding hitting governor limits. References: The Salesforce Platform Developer I Learning documents emphasize on understanding the governor limits and how to write efficient code that can handle bulk data without hitting these limits. Asynchronous processing like Batch Apex, Future methods, or Queueable Apex is often recommended for bulk data handling. You can find more information on these topics in the following links: Apex Developer Guide, Trailhead

The approach that can be used to make a custom Lightning Web Component available in the Salesforce Classic user interface is to use the Lightning Out JavaScript library to embed the Lightning Web Component in a Visualforce page and add to the page layout. Lightning Out is a feature that allows developers to use Lightning web components and Aura components outside the Lightning Experience and Salesforce app, such as in Visualforce pages, standalone apps, or external websites. By using Lightning Out, developers can leverage the benefits of Lightning Web Components, such as performance, interoperability, and modern web standards, in the Salesforce Classic user interface. To use Lightning Out, developers need to create a Lightning dependency app, which is a special type of Aura app that acts as a bridge between the Lightning web component and the Visualforce page. Then, developers need to use the $Lightning.use() and $Lightning.createComponent() methods in the Visualforce page to load the dependency app and create an instance of the Lightning web component. Finally, developers need to add the Visualforce page to the page layout of the object where they want to display the Lightning web component. References: Use Lightning Web Components in Visualforce Pages, Lightning Out, Free Salesforce Platform Developer 1 Practice Exam (With Answers)

 The best technology to create a custom user interface component that allows users to enter and validate information about their accounts is Lightning Web Components. Lightning Web Components are reusable HTML elements that use modern JavaScript and web standards to create fast and efficient user interfaces on the Lightning Platform. Lightning Web Components can leverage the Lightning Data Service to access and manipulate Salesforce data, and use the Lightning Design System to ensure a consistent look and feel. Lightning Web Components can also use Apex methods, wire adapters, and wire functions to perform complex logic and validations on the user input before saving it to the database. Flow is a declarative tool that allows users to automate business processes and guide users through screens, but it is not a technology to create custom user interface components. Visualforce is a framework that allows developers to create custom web pages and components using a tag-based markup language and Apex controllers, but it is not as fast, efficient, or modern as Lightning Web Components. VUE JavaScript framework is an external framework that can be used to create reactive user interfaces, but it is not a native Salesforce technology and it requires additional configuration and integration to work with Salesforce data and services. References:

• Lightning Web Components (Salesforce Developer Documentation)
• Build Lightning Web Components (Trailhead Trail)
• Flow Basics (Trailhead Module)
• Visualforce Basics (Trailhead Module)
• VUE JavaScript Framework (Official Website)

The first step towards troubleshooting the issue is to check the asynchronous job monitoring page to view the job status and logs. This page shows the progress, state, and results of the batch Apex job, as well as any errors or exceptions that occurred during the execution. The developer can use this information to identify the cause of the timeout and take appropriate actions to fix it. References: Using Batch Apex, Use Batch Apex Unit, Execute a batch Apex from Developer Console

Anonymous Apex code is Apex code that does not get stored in the metadata, but that can be compiled and executed on the fly. You can use Anonymous Apex code for various purposes, such as:

• To delete 15,000 inactive Accounts in a single transaction after a deployment: You can use Anonymous Apex code to perform bulk data operations that are not possible or convenient with the standard tools, such as Data Loader or Import Wizard. For example, you can write a SOQL query to select the inactive Accounts and then use the Database.delete method to delete them in a single transaction. This can save you time and avoid hitting the governor limits.
• To add unit test code coverage to an org: You can use Anonymous Apex code to write and run unit tests for your Apex classes and triggers, without having to save them in the metadata. This can help you increase your code coverage and ensure the quality of your code. You can also use the System.debug method to print the results of your tests in the debug log.

References: Anonymous Blocks, Executing Anonymous Apex Code, Execute Anonymous Apex

Custom exceptions in Apex are user-defined exception classes that can have their own member variables, methods, constructors, and interfaces. They must extend the system Exception class and have a class name that ends with “Exception”. They cannot extend other classes besides the Exception class. Custom exceptions enable more detailed error messages and custom error handling in catch blocks. They can also be rethrown as inner exceptions to preserve the stack trace information.

References:

• Create Custom Exceptions | Apex Developer Guide
• Exception Class and Built-In Exceptions | Apex Reference Guide
• Handling Exceptions in Apex: Creating and Using Custom Exceptions
• Custom Or User-Defined Exception In Apex | Salesforce Developer Tutorials
• Using custom exception types | Mastering Apex Programming

The correct implementation is to implement the line amount as a numeric formula field and the order amount as a roll-up summary field. This is because formula fields can calculate values based on other fields, such as quantity and price, without requiring any code or process1. Roll-up summary fields can aggregate values from related records, such as the sum of line amounts for an order, without requiring any code or process2. This solution is the most declarative and efficient way to achieve the requirement.

References:

• 1: Create Formula Fields
• 2: Define Roll-Up Summary Fields

The code block provided will not insert any accounts because it violates Salesforce’s governor limits. In Salesforce, you cannot perform DML (Data Manipulation Language) operations like insert, update, delete inside a loop as it can quickly exceed the governor limits (for example, you can only do 150 DML operations per transaction). Since the ‘insert’ operation is inside a for loop that iterates 500 times, this code will hit the limit and throw an error. References: The information is based on the understanding of governor limits in Salesforce which is crucial for writing efficient and optimized code. More details can be found in the Apex Developer Guide on Governor Limits: Salesforce Governor Limits

To share a specific Case-Defect_c record with a user, the developer should share the parent Case and Defect_c records. This is because the Case-Defect_c object is a junction object that has two master-detail relationships with the Case and Defect_c objects. A junction object inherits the sharing and security settings from its two master objects, so the user needs to have access to both of them to view the junction object record1. Sharing only one of the parent records is not sufficient, as the user will not be able to see the other related record. Sharing only the junction object record is not possible, as it does not have its own sharing settings.

References:

• 1: Create a Junction Object

The code snippet provided in the image is a Salesforce Apex code that is used to create new accounts in a Salesforce org. Initially, there are five existing accounts. In the provided Apex code, one account named ‘MyAccount’ is created and inserted into the org, making the total six accounts. Then, a loop is executed to create and add ten more new accounts (named ‘New Account 1’ to ‘New Account 10’) into the org using a do-while loop that runs while x is less than 10 (starting from x=1). So, after executing this code, there will be an additional eleven accounts added to the initial five accounts making it a total of fifteen (5 initial + 11 new = 16) accounts in the org. References: The explanation can be corroborated with knowledge of Apex programming on Salesforce’s official learning platform Trailhead and related documentation.

• [Apex Basics for Admins]
• [Apex Developer Guide]
• [Developer Console]

In Salesforce, the sharing context is determined by the definition of the class where a method is defined, not where it is invoked or instantiated. Since there’s no “with sharing” or “without sharing” keyword in the class definition in the provided example, it operates in system context. In system context, Apex code has access to all objects and fields— object permissions, field-level security, sharing rules aren’t applied for the current user. References: Apex Developer Guide

The code snippet uses a for loop to create a list of 200 Account objects, each with a unique name. Then, it uses the Database.insert method to insert the list of accounts into the database in one DML operation. The Database.insert method returns a list of Database.SaveResult objects, which contain information about the success or failure of each record insertion. However, the code snippet does not check the results or handle any errors that might occur. Therefore, the result of the code snippet is that 200 accounts are inserted, unless an exception is thrown due to a trigger, validation rule, governor limit, or other reason. References:

• Apex Developer Guide: Using Database Methods
• Apex Developer Guide: Bulk DML Exception Handling
• Trailhead: Apex Basics & Database

Aura Component-based development is a framework for creating Lightning web components, which are the building blocks of modern Salesforce applications. Lightning web components are self-contained and reusable units of an application, which means they can be composed together to create complex user interfaces. They also benefit from a rich component ecosystem, which includes standard components provided by Salesforce, custom components created by developers, and third-party components available on AppExchange. These advantages make Aura Component-based development more flexible, modular, and efficient than Visualforce, which is an older framework based on HTML, JavaScript, and Apex. See Aura Components Basics1 and Lightning Web Components Basics2 for more details. References: 1: Aura Components Basics | Trailhead(https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26685/what-is-mvc-and-what-are-the-advantages-of-it),  2: Lightning Web Components Basics | Trailhead(https://www.marks4sure.com/pdi-platform-developer-i-questions.html)

To find the current user’s default record type for a given object, such as Opportunity, the developer can use the Opportunity.SObjectType.getDescribe().getRecordTypeInfos() method to get a list of RecordTypeInfo objects that represent the record types available to the current user1. Then, the developer can iterate through the list and check the isDefaultRecordTypeMapping() method on each RecordTypeInfo object to determine which one is the default record type for the current user2. The default record type is the one that is automatically assigned to new records created by the user, unless the user selects a different record type3.

The developer cannot use the other options to find the current user’s default record type. Option A is incorrect because there is no such method as profile.Opportunity.getDefaultRecordType(). Option C is incorrect because there is no such class as Schema.userInfo. Option D is incorrect because it does not find the default record type before inserting the record, but rather after creating the record, which may not be the same as the default record type. References:

• RecordTypeInfo Class | Apex Reference Guide | Salesforce Developers
• Get Default Record Type Id & Name in Apex - Salesforce Stack Exchange
• Set Record Type Preferences - Salesforce Help

The developer can use the Laptop interface within the SilverLaptop class by using the keyword ‘implements’. This keyword indicates that the SilverLaptop class is implementing the Laptop interface, which means that it must provide a body for all the methods declared in the interface. For example, the SilverLaptop class can implement the Laptop interface as follows:

public class SilverLaptop implements Laptop { // code implementation public void turnOn() { // code to turn on the laptop } public void turnOff() { // code to turn off the laptop } }

The other options are not valid ways to use the Laptop interface within the SilverLaptop class. Option A uses the annotation ‘@Extends’, which is not a valid syntax in Apex. Option B uses the keyword ‘extends’, which is used to indicate inheritance between classes, not interfaces. Option C uses the annotation ‘@Interface’, which is also not a valid syntax in Apex.

References: Interfaces | Apex Developer Guide | Salesforce Developers, Prepare for Your Salesforce Platform Developer I Credential

When multiple triggers are associated to the same object and event, such as before insert or after update, the trigger execution order cannot be guaranteed by Salesforce1. This means that the triggers may run in any order, and the order may change from one execution to another. Therefore, it is not advisable to rely on the order of execution of triggers, or to assume that the order is based on the trigger name, creation date, or modification date. Instead, it is recommended to use a single trigger per object and event, and use helper classes or methods to handle the logic for different scenarios2. References:

• Triggers and Order of Execution - Apex Developer Guide - Salesforce Developers
• Best Practices for Implementing Salesforce Triggers - Salesforce Developers Blog

The @TestSetup annotation is used to create records for every method in the test class. This annotation allows you to create common test data that is available for all test methods in the class. The test setup method runs only once before any test methods in the class. This reduces the need to create the same records for every test method and improves the performance of the test class. The @BeforeTest annotation is not a valid annotation in Apex. The @isTest(SeeAllData=True) annotation is used to grant test classes and methods access to all data in the organization, not to create records. The @PreTest annotation is not a valid annotation in Apex. References: IsTest Annotation | Apex Developer Guide | Salesforce Developers, How to Write a Test Class in Salesforce? The Salesforce Developer Guide …, IsTest Annotation in Salesforce - Automation Champion

 To deploy Apex or package it for the Salesforce AppExchange, unit tests must cover at least 75% of your Apex code, and those tests must pass1. Code coverage indicates how many executable lines of code in your classes and triggers have been exercised by test methods1. Test classes (classes that are annotated with @isTest) are excluded from the code coverage calculation1. Therefore, the developer needs to create a test class and methods to cover the Apex trigger, as the helper class alone is not enough to meet the code coverage requirement. Running the tests using the ‘Run All Tests’ method, removing the failing test methods from the test class, or increasing the test class coverage on the helper class will not solve the problem, as the trigger itself is still not covered by any test. References: 1 Testing and Code Coverage | Apex Developer Guide - Salesforce Developers1

 The correct answers are A and C because they use partial DML statements and the Database.Savepoint method, which are both best practices for ensuring transaction control and avoiding exceeding governor limits. Partial DML statements allow the developer to specify whether to allow partial success or rollback on failure when performing DML operations on multiple records. This can help avoid hitting the DML row limit (10,000) or the DML statement limit (150) by committing only the valid records and reporting the errors for the invalid ones. The Database.Savepoint method allows the developer to create a savepoint, which is a point in the request that specifies the state of the database at that time. The developer can then use the Database.rollback method to revert the database to the state of a specific savepoint, discarding any changes made after that point. This can help avoid hitting the CPU time limit (10,000 ms) or the heap size limit (6 MB) by rolling back any resource-intensive actions that are not necessary or successful.

The other options are incorrect because they do not provide effective techniques for ensuring transaction control and avoiding exceeding governor limits. Option B uses the System.Limit class to monitor the current CPU governor limit consumption, which is not a best practice. The System.Limit class provides methods to check the current limit usage and the limit value for various governor limits, such as CPU time, heap size, DML statements, etc. However, monitoring the limit consumption does not prevent hitting the limit, and it can also add extra overhead to the code execution. Instead of checking the limit usage, the developer should optimize the code performance and efficiency by using best practices such as bulkification, caching, asynchronous processing, etc. Option D uses the Readonly annotation to bypass the number of rows returned by a SOQL query, which is not a best practice. The Readonly annotation allows the developer to mark an Apex class or method as read-only, which means that it can only query the database and not perform any DML operations. This can increase the maximum number of rows returned by a SOQL query from 50,000 to 1,000,000, but it also restricts the functionality of the class or method. Moreover, bypassing the query row limit does not solve the problem of performing resource-intensive actions in memory by iterating over the result set, which can still hit the CPU time limit or the heap size limit. Instead of using the Readonly annotation, the developer should use best practices such as query filters, selective queries, query limits, etc. to reduce the size of the result set and improve the query performance. References:

• Apex Developer Guide: Using Partial DML
• Apex Developer Guide: Savepoints and Rollbacks
• Apex Developer Guide: Execution Governors and Limits
• Apex Developer Guide: Working with Very Large SOQL Queries

To create test data within the unit test with the least amount of code, you can use Test.loadData to populate data in your test methods from a static resource containing test data. This way, you don’t have to write code to insert each record individually, and you can reuse the same data for multiple test methods. Test.loadData also allows you to specify the number of records to load, so you can easily test with 200 account records. Using the @isTest(isParallel=true) annotation in the test class does not affect the creation of test data, but it allows the test class to run in parallel with other test classes, which can improve performance. Using the @isTest(seeAllData=true) annotation in the test class is not recommended, as it makes the test methods rely on data in a particular organization, which can cause unexpected failures or inconsistencies. It is also a bad practice to use real data for testing, as it can expose sensitive information or cause unwanted side effects. References:

• Testing Best Practices
• Free Salesforce Platform Developer 1 Practice Exam (With Answers)
• Developer Best Practices Checklist

QUESTION: 130

The Job_Application__c custom object has a field that is a Master-Detail relationship to the Contact object, where the Contact object is the Master. As part of a feature implementation, a developer needs to retrieve a list containing all Contact records where the related Account Industry is ‘Technology’ while also retrieving the contact’s Job_Application__c records.

Based on the object’s relationships, what is the most efficient statement to retrieve the list of contacts?

A. [SELECT Id, (SELECT Id FROM Job_Applications_r) FROM Contact WHERE

Account.Industry = ‘Technology’];

B. [SELECT Id, (SELECT Id FROM Job_Applications_r) FROM Contact WHERE

Accounts.Industry = ‘Technology’];

C. [SELECT Id, (SELECT Id FROM Job_Applications_c) FROM Contact WHERE

Accounts.Industry = ‘Technology’];

D. [SELECT Id, (SELECT Id FROM Job_Application_c) FROM Contact WHERE

Account.Industry = ‘Technology’];

Answer: A

To query child records from a parent object, you need to use a subquery inside parentheses. The subquery should specify the fields to retrieve from the child object, and the relationship name to use. The parent object should be specified after the FROM clause, and any filter conditions on the parent object should be specified after the WHERE clause. In this case, the parent object is Contact, the child object is Job_Application__c, the relationship name is Job_Applications__r, and the filter condition is Account.Industry = 'Technology'.

The other options are incorrect because they use the wrong relationship name or syntax. Option B uses Accounts instead of Account, which is not a valid field on the Contact object. Option C uses Job_Applications_c instead of Job_Applications__r, which is not a valid relationship name. Option D uses Job_Application_c instead of Job_Applications__r, which is also not a valid relationship name. References:

• Trailhead: Write SOQL Queries
• Trailhead: Querying Data with SOQL
• Salesforce Developer Guide: Relationship Queries

The Lightning Component framework is a UI framework for developing Lightning components for mobile and desktop devices. Lightning web components and Aura components can coexist and interoperate on a page1. The framework provides developers with prebuilt components that can be reused, such as buttons, cards, carousels, etc2. The framework also provides templates to create custom components that follow the best practices and standards of web development3. The framework does not extend the governor limits for applications, nor does it support Classic UI. It only supports Lightning Experience, Experience Builder Sites, Salesforce Mobile App, Lightning Out, and Standalone Lightning App2.

References:

• Introducing Aura Components | Lightning Aura Components Developer Guide | Salesforce Developers
• Components - Salesforce Lightning Component Library - Salesforce Developers
• Review the Lightning Component Framework Unit | Salesforce … - Trailhead

This code is vulnerable to a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack, because it takes user-supplied input and outputs it directly back to the user without escaping the XSS-vulnerable characters, such as <, >, ", ', and &. By setting the escape attribute to false, the developer disables the anti-XSS filter that is enabled by default for most Visualforce tags. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious HTML or JavaScript code into the userInput parameter, which can then execute on the user’s browser and compromise their security or privacy. References:

• Cross Site Scripting (XSS)
• Security Tips for Apex and Visualforce Development
• Security Guidelines for Apex and Visualforce Development

 Running a flow in debug mode allows the developer to test the flow logic and functionality before activating it. Debug mode also provides detailed information about the flow elements, variables, and outcomes as the flow runs1. However, there are some limitations and considerations for debugging a flow, such as:

• Callouts to external systems are not executed when debugging a flow. This means that any flow elements that invoke Apex actions or invocable actions that make callouts will be skipped during debugging. The developer can use mock responses or stubs to simulate the callout results2.
• DML operations will be rolled back when the debugging ends. This means that any changes made to the database by the flow will not be committed or visible after the debugging session. The developer can use the Developer Console or the Setup Audit Trail to view the DML operations performed by the flow3.

The other two options are incorrect because:

• Clicking Pause or executing a Pause element does not close the flow and end debugging. Instead, it pauses the flow execution and allows the developer to inspect the flow state and variables at that point. The developer can resume the flow execution by clicking Resume or Next4.
• Input variables of type record can be passed into the flow. The developer can specify the record ID or assign field values for the input record variable when debugging the flow. The developer can also use the running user or a different user as the input record variable.

References:

• 1: Debug a Flow in Flow Builder | Salesforce Help
• 2: Debug Flows That Make Callouts | Salesforce Help
• 3: Debug Flows That Perform DML Operations | Salesforce Help
• 4: [Pause a Flow | Salesforce Help]
• : [Set Input Values for a Flow | Salesforce Help]

 SOQL injection is a vulnerability that occurs when user-supplied input is used to construct a dynamic SOQL query without proper validation or escaping. This can allow an attacker to modify the query and execute unintended commands or access unauthorized data. To prevent SOQL injection, it is recommended to use static queries with bind variables or use the escapeSingleQuotes method to sanitize the input. Based on the image descriptions from my tool outputs, the following options are safe from SOQL injection:

• Option A: This option uses a static query with a bind variable, which automatically escapes any malicious input and prevents it from changing the query structure. The bind variable name is obtained from an apex:inputText tag on a Visualforce page and is used as a filter for the Account Name field.
• Option C: This option also uses a static query with a bind variable, which is the same as option A. The only difference is that the bind variable name is obtained from a different apex:inputText tag on the same Visualforce page and is used as a filter for the Contact Name field.

The other options are not safe from SOQL injection because they use dynamic queries with string concatenation, which can allow an attacker to inject SOQL commands into the query string and bypass the intended logic or access unauthorized data.

References: The use of static queries with bind variables and the escapeSingleQuotes method to prevent SOQL injection can be referenced in the Salesforce Platform Developer I learning documents, specifically in modules that cover Apex security and SOQL, such as:

• SOQL Injection
• Secure Coding SQL Injection
• Apex Basics & Database

 To display any validation rule violation to the user, the developer needs to include the apex:message component on the Visualforce page. This component displays a custom message or an exception message, depending on the value of the id attribute. If the id attribute matches the id of another component on the page, such as an input field, the apex:message component displays the validation error for that component. If the id attribute is not specified, the apex:message component displays the first exception message generated by the controller. The developer can also use the apex:messages component to display all the messages for the page, not just the first one.

Option A is incorrect because adding custom controller attributes to display the message would require additional logic and coding in the controller and the Visualforce page. Option C is incorrect because using a try/catch with a custom exception class would not display the validation rule violation to the user, but rather handle the exception in the controller. Option D is incorrect because performing the DML using the Database.upsert() method would not display the validation rule violation to the user, but rather return a list of Database.SaveResult objects that contain the success or failure status of each record.

References: apex:message | Visualforce Developer Guide, ValidationRule | Metadata API Developer Guide, How to Display Validation Rule Errors in Visualforce Page

External IDs are useful for data integration and synchronization between Salesforce and other external platforms. By mapping records based on the External ID, you can easily import, update, or upsert data from external sources without relying on the Salesforce record ID. External IDs are also indexed, which means they can speed up the SOQL queries that use them as filters or join conditions. References: External ID in Salesforce: Everything You Need To Know, Relating Records by Using an External ID, Certification - Platform Developer I - Trailhead

Declarative development is the process of configuring and customizing the Salesforce platform using its built-in tools, such as the setup menu, without writing any code. Declarative development has the following advantages over programmatic customization, which involves writing custom code using Apex, Visualforce, or other languages:

• Declarative development can be done by anyone who knows how to use the Salesforce user interface, without requiring any programming knowledge or skills. Programmatic customization requires a skilled developer who knows how to write, test, and debug code.
• Declarative development does not require Apex test classes, which are mandatory for deploying any custom code to production. Apex test classes are used to verify the functionality and quality of the code, and to ensure that it meets the code coverage requirement of at least 75%. Declarative development does not have this requirement, as the platform automatically validates the configuration and customization.
• Declarative development is faster and easier to implement, as it involves clicking and dragging components, setting properties, and defining rules. Programmatic customization is more time-consuming and complex, as it involves writing lines of code, using development tools, and following coding standards and best practices.

However, declarative development also has some limitations and disadvantages compared to programmatic customization, such as:

• Declarative development has lower design limits and query limits than programmatic customization. Design limits are the maximum number of components, fields, objects, rules, etc. that can be used in a Salesforce org. Query limits are the maximum number of records that can be retrieved or manipulated in a single transaction. Programmatic customization can bypass some of these limits by using techniques such as dynamic SOQL, batch Apex, or asynchronous Apex.
• Declarative development has less flexibility and control over the functionality and user interface than programmatic customization. Programmatic customization can create custom logic, automation, integration, and user interface that are not possible or supported by the declarative tools. For example, programmatic customization can use Apex triggers to execute logic before or after a record is inserted, updated, deleted, or undeleted, while declarative development can only use workflow rules or process builder to execute logic after a record is created or updated.
• Declarative development can become difficult to maintain and troubleshoot as the complexity and number of components, rules, and dependencies increase. Programmatic customization can be more organized and modular, as it can use classes, methods, variables, comments, and annotations to structure and document the code.

Therefore, the best practice is to use a combination of declarative and programmatic development, depending on the use case and the requirements. The general rule of thumb is to use declarative development whenever possible, and use programmatic customization only when necessary or when it provides significant benefits.

References:

• Programmatic vs Declarative: Are Clicks Better Than Code?
• Clicks Not Code: Benefits of Declarative Vs. Imperative Programming
• Review Developer Fundamentals Unit

 In Salesforce, the sharing rules are always enforced for the running user if not explicitly stated otherwise. The running user’s permissions and field-level security are always enforced, regardless of whether the class is defined with or without sharing. So in this case, since there is no explicit sharing declaration in the provided code snippet, it defaults to enforcing the sharing rules for the running user. References:

• Apex Developer Guide: Using the with sharing, without sharing, and inherited sharing Keywords
• Trailhead: Apex Sharing and Security

 To use a custom exception, you can create an instance of the custom exception class and use the throw keyword to throw the exception. You can also optionally provide a custom error message or a chained exception cause as arguments to the custom exception constructor. The syntax for throwing a custom exception is:

throw new CustomException(optional_message, optional_cause);

Therefore, the options B and D are valid ways to fire the custom exception in Apex. The options A and C are invalid because they only create an instance of the custom exception class, but do not throw it. Also, the option C uses single quotes instead of double quotes for the error message, which is not allowed in Apex. References: You can find more information about custom exceptions in the Apex Developer Guide and the Apex Reference Guide on Salesforce’s official website. You can also read this blog post for a tutorial on creating and using custom exceptions.

 To create a CreditcardPayment class that provides an implementation of an existing Payment class, the developer should use the extends keyword to indicate that CreditcardPayment is a subclass of Payment, and the override keyword to indicate that CreditcardPayment provides a different implementation of the makePayment method than the superclass. This way, the CreditcardPayment class inherits the properties and methods of the Payment class, but can also modify or add its own behavior.

The other options are not correct because:

• B. Public class CreditCardPayment implements Payment. This option is not valid, because the implements keyword is used to indicate that a class implements an interface, not another class. An interface is a collection of abstract methods that a class must define, but a class is a blueprint for creating objects that have properties and methods.
• C. Public class CreditCardPayment extends Payment. This option is not valid, because it does not use the override keyword to provide a different implementation of the makePayment method. Without the override keyword, the subclass would inherit the same implementation of the method as the superclass, which defeats the purpose of creating a subclass.
• D. Public class CreditCardPayment implements Payment. This option is not valid, because it has the same problem as option B. It uses the implements keyword instead of the extends keyword, which is incorrect for creating a subclass of another class.

References:

• : Inheritance
• : Interfaces

The developer should select the Allow reparenting option on the master-detail relationship between Order and OrderItem. This option enables the developer to change the parent record of a child record in a master-detail relationship, which is also known as reparenting. By default, reparenting is not allowed in master-detail relationships, because the child record inherits the sharing and security settings of its parent record. However, in some cases, such as splitting an order into multiple orders, reparenting may be necessary to move some existing OrderItem records to a new Order record. The developer can use the Apex Data Manipulation Language (DML) statements, such as update or upsert, to change the parent record of the OrderItem records.

Changing the master-detail relationship to an external lookup relationship is not a valid option, because external lookup relationships are only available for external objects, which are objects that map to data stored outside Salesforce. Adding without sharing to the Apex class declaration is not a relevant option, because it only affects the sharing rules that apply to the Apex class, not the relationship between the objects. Creating a junction object between OrderItem and Order is not a suitable option, because it would create a many-to-many relationship between the objects, which is not the desired outcome.

References: Master-Detail Relationships, Reparent Records in Master-Detail Relationships, Prepare for Your Salesforce Platform Developer I Credential

You can render any page as a PDF by adding the renderAs attribute to the  component, and specifying "pdf" as the rendering service1. For example: . You can also use the PageReference.getContentAsPDF() method in Apex to render a Visualforce page as PDF data, and then use Apex code to convert that PDF data to an email attachment, a document, a Chatter post, and so on2. References:

• 1: Render a Visualforce Page as a PDF File | Visualforce Developer Guide | Salesforce Developers
• 2: Render a Visualforce Page as PDF from Apex | Visualforce Developer Guide | Salesforce Developers

 Salesforce CLI is a command-line interface that allows developers to create, test, and deploy code and configurations to any Salesforce environment1. Salesforce CLI is the recommended tool for deploying custom Apex code and Lightning Components, as it provides more flexibility, control, and automation than other deployment methods2. Salesforce CLI can also integrate with source control systems, such as Git, to enable version control and collaboration among developers3. Using a change set is another option to deploy code and configurations from one Salesforce org to another, but it has some limitations, such as requiring a deployment connection, not supporting all metadata types, and not allowing selective deployment of components4. Using the Force.com IDE or the Ant Migration Tool are also possible ways to deploy code and configurations, but they are less user-friendly and require more manual steps than Salesforce CLI5 . References:

• Salesforce CLI | Salesforce Developer Tools
• Deploy Your Code with Salesforce CLI | Salesforce Trailhead
• Manage Projects with Salesforce DX | Salesforce Trailhead
• Change Sets | Salesforce Trailhead
• Force.com IDE | Salesforce Developer Tools
• [Ant Migration Tool | Salesforce Developer Tools]

A developer can execute tests in an org using different methods, depending on the context and the tools available. The Tooling API1 allows developers to run tests programmatically by making REST or SOAP calls. The Setup Menu2 provides a user interface for running tests in the Salesforce org. Salesforce DX3 is a command-line tool that enables developers to create, test, and deploy applications using scratch orgs, which are temporary and customizable orgs for development and testing purposes. References: 1: Tooling API | Apex Developer Guide | Salesforce Developers(https://cloudely.com/salesforce-interview-questions-with-answers/),  2: Run Unit Tests | Apex Developer Guide | Salesforce Developers(https://www.exam4training.com/what-are-three-ways-for-a-developer-to-execute-tests-in-an-org-choose-3/),  3: Salesforce DX | Salesforce Developers(https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/types-of-software-testing/)

• By providing device-awareness for mobile and desktops. This is true because the Lightning Component framework is a UI framework for developing Lightning components for mobile and desktop devices. Lightning web components and Aura components can coexist and interoperate on a page. The framework takes care of rendering the components appropriately for different devices and screen sizes1.
• By providing an Agile process with default steps. This is false because the Lightning Component framework does not provide any specific process or methodology for developing solutions. Developers can use any process that suits their needs, such as Agile, Waterfall, or Scrum2.
• By providing code review standards and processes. This is false because the Lightning Component framework does not provide any code review standards or processes. Developers are responsible for ensuring the quality and maintainability of their code, and they can use tools such as code analysis, testing, and debugging to help them3.
• By providing change history and version control. This is false because the Lightning Component framework does not provide any change history or version control features. Developers can use tools such as Git, SVN, or Salesforce DX to manage their source code and track changes.

References:

• 1: Introducing Aura Components
• 2: Agile Development with Salesforce
• 3: Code Quality and Code Analysis
• : Source Control and Salesforce Development

The correct answers are option C and option D. Lightning Web Components are self-contained and reusable units of an application that follow web standards and can leverage modern web features. They also benefit from a rich component ecosystem that includes standard components, custom components, and third-party components. Visualforce, on the other hand, is a legacy framework that relies on server-side rendering and proprietary markup. It does not offer the same level of modularity, performance, and interoperability as Lightning Web Components. References: The information can be referenced from the official Salesforce documentation and learning materials available on Trailhead. Specifically, it aligns with the objectives outlined in Lightning Web Components Basics, where the benefits and features of Lightning Web Components are discussed. Lightning Web Components Basics

 To create a Lightning component on a Visualforce page, you need to use the Lightning Components for Visualforce JavaScript library, which is included by the apex:includeLightning/ tag. This library provides the $Lightning object, which has two methods: $Lightning.use and $Lightning.createComponent. The $Lightning.use method references a Lightning dependency app that declares the component dependencies. The $Lightning.createComponent method creates an instance of the component and renders it on the page. See Use Lightning Components in Visualforce Pages1 for more details. References: 1: Use Lightning Components in Visualforce Pages | Lightning Aura Components Developer Guide | Salesforce Developers(https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/atlas.en-us.lightning.meta/lightning/components_visualforce.htm)

Creating a test class to execute the business logic and run the test in the Developer Console is the best approach to ensure that the Apex class is working according to specification. Test classes are used to verify the functionality, performance, and security of the Apex code, and to provide code coverage for deployment. Test classes can also use assertions to validate the expected outcomes of the code. The Developer Console provides a user interface to create, run, and debug test classes, and to view the test results and code coverage1.

Including a savepoint and Database.rollback is not a valid approach to test the Apex class, as it is used to undo the changes made by the DML operations in a transaction2. This does not verify the functionality or performance of the Apex code, nor does it provide code coverage.

Including a try/catch block to the Apex class is not a sufficient approach to test the Apex class, as it is used to handle the exceptions that may occur during the execution of the code3. This does not verify the functionality or performance of the Apex code, nor does it provide code coverage. Moreover, a try/catch block should be used in conjunction with a test class, not as a replacement.

Running the code in an Execute Anonymous block in the Developer Console is not a recommended approach to test the Apex class, as it is used to execute arbitrary Apex code that is not saved as part of the application. This does not verify the functionality or performance of the Apex code, nor does it provide code coverage. Moreover, running the code in an Execute Anonymous block may have unintended consequences on the data and the application, as it does not follow the best practices of testing.

References:

• 1: Test Classes | Apex Developer Guide | Salesforce Developers
• 2: Savepoints and Rollbacks | Apex Developer Guide | Salesforce Developers
• 3: Exception Handling | Apex Developer Guide | Salesforce Developers
• : [Execute Anonymous | Apex Developer Guide | Salesforce Developers]
• : [Best Practices for Testing | Apex Developer Guide | Salesforce Developers]

 Salesforce CLI is a command-line interface that lets you run commands to create, test, and deploy Salesforce applications. You can easily integrate Salesforce CLI commands into various CI tools, such as CircleCI, Jenkins, or Travis CI, to automate testing and deployment of Salesforce applications against scratch orgs. Salesforce CLI also supports the Salesforce DX development model, which enables source-driven development, team collaboration, and agile delivery. References:

• Continuous Integration | Salesforce DX Developer Guide
• Set Up Continuous Integration for Your Salesforce Projects | Salesforce Developers Blog
• Collaborate Using Continuous Integration Unit | Salesforce Trailhead

The problem of duplicate order records is caused by the integration not being able to identify the existing order record in Salesforce and creating a new one instead. To prevent this, the integration needs to use a unique identifier that can match the order record in both systems. The order number in the OMS can serve as such an identifier, if it is guaranteed to be unique and not reused. Therefore, the following actions can prevent the duplicate order records from being created in Salesforce:

• Option A: Ensure that the order number in the OMS is unique. This will ensure that there is no ambiguity or confusion when matching the order records in both systems.
• Option B: Use the order number from the OMS as an external ID. An external ID is a custom field that can be used to store a unique identifier from an external system. By using the order number from the OMS as an external ID, the integration can use the upsert operation to either insert a new order record or update an existing one based on the external ID value.

References:

• Trailhead: Data Modeling (1)
• Trailhead: Data Integration (2)
• Apex Developer Guide: Upserting Records (3)

To support split shipments, a developer should add an Order_shipment_Group_c object and a master-detail field on Order_Line_c. The Order_shipment_Group_c object represents a group of order lines that share the same delivery method and destination address1. The master-detail field on Order_Line_c establishes a relationship between each order line and its corresponding order shipment group. This way, the shipping information can be stored in the Order_shipment_Group_c object instead of the Order_c object, and any number of order lines on a single order can be shipped to different locations.

References:

• OrderDeliveryGroup | Object Reference for the Salesforce Platform | Salesforce Developers

In this scenario, a formula field is the most appropriate choice to calculate the ratio between rejected and approved timesheets for a given project. This is because formula fields automatically calculate their values based on other fields’ values, requiring no additional maintenance or manual intervention. They are used for read-only purposes and are visible to users if they have read access to the object containing the formula field. To create the formula field, the developer can use the following expression:

IF(Total_Approved_Timesheets__c > 0, Total_Rejected_Timesheet__c / Total_Approved_Timesheets__c, 0)

This expression checks if the total approved timesheets is greater than zero, and if so, divides the total rejected timesheets by the total approved timesheets. Otherwise, it returns zero. This formula field will display the ratio as a decimal number, which can be formatted as a percentage if desired.

References: The use of formula fields for automatic calculations can be referenced in the Salesforce Platform Developer I learning documents, specifically in modules that cover objects and fields management, such as:

• Create Object Relationships
• Data Modeling
• Formula Operators and Functions by Context

A developer should use the Salesforce CLI to script the deployment and unit test execution as part of continuous integration. The Salesforce CLI is a powerful command line interface that simplifies development and build automation when working with your Salesforce org. You can use the Salesforce CLI to perform various tasks such as creating and deploying metadata, running Apex tests, retrieving debug logs, and managing orgs1. References:

• Salesforce CLI
• Certification - Platform Developer I - Trailhead
• SALESFORCE CERTIFIED PLATFORM DEVELOPER I

The Salesforce Lightning Design System (SLDS) is a CSS framework that provides a look and feel that is consistent with Lightning Experience1. By incorporating the SLDS CSS stylesheet into the JavaScript applications, the developer can apply the same styles and components that are used in Lightning Experience, without having to rewrite the entire application or change the underlying logic. This is the quickest and most effective way to update the custom applications to match the Lightning Experience UI.

The other options are not as quick or effective as option A. Option B would require rewriting all the Visualforce pages as Lightning components, which would be time-consuming and complex, especially if the applications use a third-party JavaScript framework that is not compatible with Lightning Web Components. Option C is not valid, as there is no such attribute as enableLightning in the Visualforce page definition. Option D would enable the Visualforce pages to be accessed from Lightning Experience, Lightning Communities, and the mobile app, but it would not change the appearance or behavior of the pages to match the Lightning Experience UI. References:

• Style with Lightning Design System - Salesforce Developers
• Using the Salesforce Lightning Design System in Apps - Salesforce Developers

In this scenario, a formula field is the most appropriate choice to calculate the ratio between rejected and approved timesheets for a given project. This is because formula fields automatically calculate their values based on other fields’ values, requiring no additional maintenance or manual intervention when the related fields are updated. They are used for read-only purposes and are visible to users if they have read access to the object containing the formula field. References: The use of formula fields for automatic calculations can be referenced in Salesforce’s official documentation and learning modules, specifically under the section that covers objects and fields in Salesforce (Objects and Fields.

https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/atlas.en-us.pages.meta/pages/pages_controller_sosc_custom_button.htm

Cascading delete operations occur when a record that has a master-detail relationship with another record is deleted, and the child records are also deleted as a result. This action may cause triggers to fire on both the parent and the child records, depending on the trigger definition and the operation type. For example, if a trigger is defined on the child object to execute after delete, it will fire when the parent record is deleted and the child records are cascaded. Similarly, if a trigger is defined on the parent object to execute before delete, it will fire when the parent record is deleted and before the child records are cascaded. However, updates to feed items, renaming or replacing a picklist entry, and changing a user’s default division do not directly cause triggers to fire, unless they are part of a larger transaction that involves a DML operation on a trigger-enabled object. References: Triggers and Merge Statements, Triggers and Recovered Records, Triggers

A trace flag is a configuration that specifies the debug level, the start time, the end time, and the log type for a user, an Apex class, or an Apex trigger. The log types are DEVELOPER_LOG, USER_DEBUG, and CLASS_TRACING. A trace flag can be configured for Visualforce, Apex classes, and users to enable logging of their activities and events. For example, a trace flag can be set for a Visualforce page to capture the execution time, view state, and heap size. A trace flag can also be set for an Apex class or trigger to override the default logging level and capture more or less information. A trace flag can also be set for a user to monitor their actions and interactions with Salesforce. A trace flag cannot be configured for Process Builder or outbound messages, as they are not supported log types. References:

• TraceFlag from the Tooling API Developer Guide
• Debug Log Levels from the Salesforce Help
• Set Up Debug Logging from the Salesforce Help