Professional-Cloud-DevOps-Engineer Google Cloud Certified - Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer Exam Questions and Answers

https://cloud.google.com/logging/docs/logs-based-metrics#counter-metric

The correct answer is A. Select a latency metric for a request-based method of evaluation.

A latency metric measures how responsive your service is to users.For example, you can use thecloud.googleapis.com/http/server/response_latenciesmetric to measure the latency of HTTP requests to your service1. A request-based method of evaluation counts the number of successful requests that meet a certain criterion, such as being below a latency threshold, and compares it to the number of all requests.For example, you can define an SLI as the ratio of requests with latency below 300 ms to all requests2. A request-based method of evaluation is suitable for measuring performance over time, such as per calendar month.You can set an SLO for the SLI to be at least 90%, which means that you expect 90% of the requests to have latency below 300 ms in a month3.

https://www.atlassian.com/incident-management/kpis/common-metrics

https://linkedin.github.io/school-of-sre/

Terraform is an open-source tool that allows you to define and provision infrastructure as code1. Terraform can be used to create and manage Google Cloud resources, such as projects, networks, and services2. The Cloud Foundation Toolkit is a set of open-source Terraform modules and tools that provide best practices and guidance for deploying Google Cloud infrastructure3. The Cloud Foundation Toolkit includes Terraform repositories for creating Google Cloud projects and related resources, such as IAM policies, APIs, service accounts, and billing4. By using the Terraform repositories from the Cloud Foundation Toolkit, you can design a fast, reliable, and repeatable solution for your company toprovision new projects and basic resources in Google Cloud. You can also customize the Terraform code to suit your specific needs and preferences.

The best option for implementing a scalable solution to support global Prometheus querying and minimize management overhead is to use Google Cloud Managed Service for Prometheus. Google Cloud Managed Service for Prometheus is a fully managed service that allows you to collect, query, and visualize metrics from your GKE clusters using Prometheus-based tooling. You can use Google Cloud Managed Service for Prometheus to query metrics across multiple clusters and regions using a global view. You can also use Google Cloud Managed Service for Prometheus to integrate with other Google Cloud services, such as Cloud Monitoring, Cloud Logging, and BigQuery. By using Google Cloud ManagedService for Prometheus, you can avoid managing and scaling your own Prometheus servers and focus on your application performance.

The best option for minimizing the number of log sinks created and ensuring that the log sinks apply to future projects is to create an aggregated log sink in the Dev and Prod folders. An aggregated log sink is a log sink that collects logs from multiple sources, such as projects, folders, or organizations. By creating an aggregated log sink in each folder, you can export log entries for development projects to dev_dataset and log entries for production projects to prod_dataset. You can also use filters to specify which logs you want to export. Additionally, by creating an aggregated log sink at the folder level, you can ensure that the log sink applies to future projects that are created under that folder.

https://cloud.google.com/monitoring/access-control

(https://sre.google/workbook/implementing-slos/#slo-decision-matrix)

The correct answer is A. Communicate your intent to the incident team. Perform a load analysis to determine if the remaining nodes can handle the increase in traffic offloaded from the removed node, and scale appropriately. When any new nodes report healthy, drain traffic from the unhealthy node, and remove the unhealthy node from service.

This answer follows the Google-recommended practices for incident management, as described in the Chapter 9 - Incident Response, Google SRE Book1. According to this source, some of the best practices are:

Maintain a clear line of command. Designate clearly defined roles. Keep a working record of debugging and mitigation as you go. Declare incidents early and often.

Communicate your intent before taking any action that might affect the service or the incident response. This helps to avoid confusion, duplication of work, or unintended consequences.

Perform a load analysis before removing a node from the load balancer pool, as this might affect the capacity and performance of the service. Scale the pool as necessary to handle the expected load.

Drain traffic from the unhealthy node before removing it from service, as this helps to avoid dropping requests or causing errors for users.

Answer A follows these best practices by communicating the intent to the incident team, performing a load analysis and scaling the pool, and draining traffic from the unhealthy node before removing it.

Answer B does not follow the best practice of performing a load analysis before adding or removing nodes, as this might cause overloading or underutilization of resources.

Answer C does not follow the best practice of communicating the intent before taking any action, as this might cause confusion or conflict with other responders.

Answer D does not follow the best practice of draining traffic from the unhealthy node before removing it, as this might cause errors for users.

The correct answer is D. Grant the roles/storage.objectAdmin Identity and Access Management (IAM) role to the Cloud Build service account on the state file bucket.

According to the Google Cloud documentation, Cloud Build is a service that executes your builds on Google Cloud Platform infrastructure1. Cloud Build uses a service account to execute your build steps and access resources, such as Cloud Storage buckets2. Terraform is an open-source tool that allows you to define and provision infrastructure as code3. Terraform uses a state file to store and track the state of your infrastructure4. You can configure Terraform to use a Cloud Storage bucket as a backend to store and share the state file across multiple users or environments5.

The error message indicates that Cloud Build failed to access the Cloud Storage bucket that contains the Terraform state file. This is likely because the Cloud Build service account does not have the necessary permissions to read and write objects in the bucket. To resolve this issue, you need to grant the roles/storage.objectAdmin IAM role to the Cloud Build service account on the state file bucket. This role allows the service account to create, delete, and manage objects in the bucket6. You can use the gcloud command-line tool or the Google Cloud Console to grant this role.

The other options are incorrect because they do not follow Google-recommended practices. Option A is incorrect because it changes the Terraform code to use local state, which is not recommended for production or collaborative environments, as it can cause conflicts, data loss, or inconsistency. Option B is incorrect because it creates a new storage bucket with the name specified in the Terraform configuration, but it does not grant any permissions to the Cloud Build service account on the new bucket. Option C is incorrect because it grants the roles/owner IAM role to the Cloud Build service account on the project, which is too broad and violates the principle of least privilege. The roles/owner role grants full access to all resources in the project, which can pose a security risk if misused or compromised.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From General SRE Principles and Google Cloud Knowledge:

Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) emphasizes reliability, automation, and a data-driven approach to operations. The goal is to minimize the "time to detect" (TTD) and "time to resolve" (TTR) for incidents.

Option A (Ensure that full autonomy and permissions are only granted to the on-call team): While the on-call team needs appropriate permissions to act decisively during an incident, granting full autonomy and only to them can be a bottleneck and goes against the principle of least privilege if not carefully scoped. Broader teams might need specific, controlled access for their responsibilities. SRE encourages empowering teams but within a structured framework.

Option B (Automate common tasks to analyze key impact information and intelligently suggest mitigating actions for the on-call team): This is a core SRE practice. Automation reduces toil, speeds up response, and ensures consistency. Analyzing impact and suggesting mitigations helps the on-call team resolve issues faster and more effectively.

Option C (Ensure that all teams can modify the production environment to resolve issues): This is generally a bad practice and against SRE principles of controlled changes and reducing the blast radius of errors. Production changes should be managed, audited, and ideally automated, not open to modification by all teams, as this increases the risk of unintended incidents.

Option D (Create an alerting mechanism for your SRE team based on your system's internal behavior): While alerting is crucial, SRE emphasizes alerting on symptoms that affect users (Service Level Objectives - SLOs) rather than just internal behavior or causes. Alerting solely on internal behavior can lead to alert fatigue and may not correlate directly with user impact. Good alerting focuses on user-facing impact first.

Option E (Create up-to-date playbooks with instructions for debugging and mitigating issues): Playbooks (or runbooks) are essential in SRE. They document known issues, troubleshooting steps, and mitigation procedures. Keeping them up-to-date ensures that on-call engineers can respond to incidents quickly and consistently, even for less common issues, thereby minimizing customer impact.

Therefore, automating incident response tasks (B) and maintaining clear, actionable playbooks (E) are two key SRE practices to implement for minimizing customer impact.

Reference (Based on SRE principles):

The SRE books by Google (e.g., "Site Reliability Engineering: How Google Runs Production Systems") heavily emphasize automation to reduce toil and the importance of playbooks for incident management.

Google Cloud SRE solutions: https://cloud.google.com/sre

Specifically, regarding playbooks and automation:"Playbooks should be living documents, updated regularly as systems change and new incidents provide new lessons."

"SREs aim to automate repetitive tasks (toil) to free up time for engineering projects that improve reliability."

The correct answer is C. Configure Cloud Profiler, and initialize the cloud.google.com/go/profiler library in the application.

According to the Google Cloud documentation, Cloud Profiler is a statistical, low-overhead profiler that continuously gathers CPU usage and memory-allocation information from your production applications1. Cloud Profiler can help you identify slow paths in your code and optimize the performance of your applications. Cloud Profiler supports applications written in Go that run on App Engine standard environment2. To use Cloud Profiler, you need to configure it in your Google Cloud project and initialize the cloud.google.com/go/profiler library in your application code3. You can then use the Cloud Profiler interface to analyze the profiling data and visualize the results by using flame graphs4. Cloud Profiler has minimal performance impact and management overhead, as it only samples a small fraction of the application activity and does not require any additional infrastructure or agents.

The other options are incorrect because they do not meet the requirements of minimizing performance impact and management overhead. Option A is incorrect because it requires installing a continuous profiling tool into Compute Engine, which is an additional infrastructure that needs to be managed and maintained. Option B is incorrect because it requires periodically running the go tool pprof command against the application instance, which is a manual and disruptive process that can affect the application performance. Option D is incorrect because it only uses Cloud Monitoring to assess the App Engine CPU utilization metric, which is not enough to identify slow paths in the code or optimize the application performance.

Rollback to previous stable version. Then you need to find what is causing the issue.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Cloud Run scales down to zero when idle. If CPU is allocated only during request processing, background telemetry tasks (like OpenTelemetry traces) may not complete before the container shuts down.

Solution: Configure CPU to be always-allocated → This ensures that background tasks (like trace exports) continue even when the service is idle.

????Why not other options?

A (Increasing CPU to 4 cores)❌→ More CPU won’t help if traces are being cut off due to shutdown.

B (Using an HTTP health check)❌→ Doesn’t affect OpenTelemetry traces.

C (CPU only during request processing)❌→ This causes the problem because traces need CPU after request completion to be exported.

????Official Reference:

Cloud Run Tracing with OpenTelemetry

Cloud Run Always-Allocated CPU

https://devops.com/when-it-disaster-strikes-part-3-conducting-a-blameless-post-mortem/

Your application runs on Google Cloud Platform (GCP). You need to implement Jenkins for deploying application releases to GCP. You want to streamline the release process, lower operational toil, and keep user data secure. What should you do?

https://plugins.jenkins.io/google-compute-engine/

https://cloud.google.com/security-key-management

The correct answer is B. Create an attestation for the builds that pass the load test by using a private key stored in Cloud Key Management Service (Cloud KMS) authenticated through Workload Identity.

According to the Google Cloud documentation, Binary Authorization is a deploy-time security control that ensures only trusted container images are deployed on Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) or Cloud Run1.Binary Authorization uses attestations to certify that a specific image has completed a previous stage in the CI/CD pipeline, such as passing a load test2.Attestations are signed by private keys that are associated with attestors, which are entities that verify the attestations3.To follow Google-recommended practices, you should store your private keys in Cloud Key ManagementService (Cloud KMS), which is a secure and scalable service for managing cryptographic keys4.You should also use Workload Identity, which is a feature that allows Kubernetes service accounts to act as Google service accounts, to authenticate to Cloud KMS and sign attestations without having to manage or expose service account keys5.

The other options are incorrect because they do not follow Google-recommended practices. Option A and option D require human intervention to sign the attestations, which is not scalable or automated. Option C exposes the service account JSON key as a Kubernetes Secret, which is less secure than using Workload Identity.

The correct answer is A. Add the Logs Writer role to the service account.

To use Cloud Logging, the service account attached to the Compute Engine instance must have the necessary permissions to write log entries. The Logs Writer role (roles/logging.logWriter) provides this permission.You can grant this role to the user-managed service account at the project, folder, or organization level1.

Private Google Access is not required for Cloud Logging, as it allows instances without external IP addresses to access Google APIs and services2.The default Compute Engine service account already has the Logs Writer role, but it is not a recommended practice to use it for user applications3.Exporting the service account key and configuring the agents to use the key is not a secure way of authenticating the service account, as it exposes the key to potential compromise4.

https://cloud.google.com/billing/docs/how-to/export-data-bigquery

https://cloud.google.com/logging/docs/audit#access-control

When disaster strikes, the person who declares the incident typically steps into the IC role and directs the high-level state of the incident. The IC concentrates on the 3Cs and does the following: Commands and coordinates the incident response, delegating roles as needed. By default, the IC assumes all roles that have not been delegated yet. Communicates effectively. Stays in control of the incident response. Works with other responders to resolve the incident.https://sre.google/workbook/incident-response/

The best option for updating the instance template and minimizing disruption to the application and the number of pipeline runs is to set the create_before_destroy meta-argument to true in the lifecycle block on the instance template. The create_before_destroy meta-argument is a Terraform feature that specifies that a new resource should be created before destroying an existing one during an update. This way, you can avoid downtime and errors when updating a resource that is in use by another resource, such as an instance template that is used by a managed instance group. By setting the create_before_destroy meta-argument to true in the lifecycle block on the instance template, you can ensure that Terraform creates a new instance template with the updated machine type, updates the managed instance group to use the new instance template, and then deletes the old instance template.

The correct answer is C. Configure Anthos Config Management with the GitHub repository. When there is a change in the repository, use Anthos Config Management to apply the change.

According to the web search results, Anthos Config Management is a service that lets you manage the configuration of your Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) clusters from a single source of truth, such as a GitHub repository1. Anthos Config Management can enforce several constraint templates across your GKE clusters by using Policy Controller, which is a feature that integrates the Open Policy Agent (OPA) Constraint Framework into Anthos Config Management2. Policy Controller can apply constraints that include policy parameters, such as restricting the Kubernetes API3. To use Anthos Config Management and Policy Controller, you need to configure them with your GitHub repository and enable the sync mode4. When there is a change in the repository, Anthos Config Management will automatically sync and apply the change to your GKE clusters5.

The other options are incorrect because they do not use Anthos Config Management and Policy Controller. Option A is incorrect because it uses a GitHub action to trigger Cloud Build, which is a service that executes your builds on Google Cloud Platform infrastructure6. Cloud Build can run a gcloud CLI command to apply the change, but it does not use Anthos Config Management or Policy Controller. Option B is incorrect because it uses a web hook to send a request to Anthos Service Mesh, which is a service that provides a uniform way to connect, secure, monitor, and manage microservices on GKE clusters7. Anthos Service Mesh can apply the change, but it does not use Anthos Config Management or Policy Controller. Option D is incorrect because it uses Config Connector, which is a service that lets you manage Google Cloud resources through Kubernetes configuration. Config Connector can apply the change, but it does not use Anthos Config Management or Policy Controller.

 The best option for mitigating the incident impact on users and enabling the developers to troubleshoot the issue is to change the selector on the Service app-svc to app: my-app, version: blue. A Service is a resource that defines how to access a set of Pods. A selector is a field that specifies which Pods are selected by the Service. By changing the selector on the Service app-svc to app: my-app, version: blue, you can ensure that the Service only routes traffic to the Pods that have both labels app: my-app and version: blue. These Pods belong to the Deployment app-blue, which uses the previous version of the application. This way, you can mitigate the incident impact on users by switching back to the working version of the application. You can also enable the developers to troubleshoot the issue with the new version of the application in the Deployment app-green without affecting users.

The best option for creating the development and production environments for each team while minimizing costs and ensuring isolation is to create a development and a production GKE cluster in separate projects, in each cluster create a Kubernetes namespace per team, and then configure Kubernetes role-based access control (RBAC) so that each team can only access its own namespace. This option allows you to use fewer clusters and projects than creating one project or cluster per team, which reduces costs and complexity. It also allows you to isolate each team’s environment by using namespaces and RBAC, which prevents teams from accessing other teams’ environments.

The best option for deploying a new version of your containerized application to production on GKE and ensuring that the application does not have performance problems after deployment is to deploy the application through a continuous delivery pipeline by using canary deployments, use Cloud Monitoring to look for performance issues, and ramp up traffic as supported by the metrics. A canary deployment is a deployment strategy that involves releasing a new version of an application to a subset of users or servers and monitoring its performance and reliability. This way, you can test the new version in the production environment with real traffic and load, and gradually increase the traffic as the metrics indicate. You can use Cloud Monitoring to collect and analyze metrics from your application and GKE cluster, such as latency, error rate, CPU utilization, and memory usage. You can also use Cloud Monitoring to set up alerts and dashboards to track the performance of your application.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From SRE Principles:

This scenario presents a classic SRE conflict: maintaining reliability (as dictated by the exhausted error budget and deployment freeze) versus delivering an urgent business requirement. The error budget policy is there for a reason – to protect users from further instability.

A. Start the deployment of the feature immediately: This directly violates the established error budget policy and the deployment freeze. While the feature is urgent, deploying without caution when the system is already unstable (as indicated by the exhausted error budget) is highly risky and could exacerbate existing problems or introduce new ones, further impacting revenue and customer trust.

B. Delay the deployment of the feature until the error budget is replenished: This strictly adheres to the policy but might not be acceptable given the "urgently required by your largest customer" clause. SRE principles allow for reasoned exceptions and risk management, not just blind adherence if the business context is compelling enough and risks are managed.

C. Re-run the unit tests, and start the deployment of the feature if the tests pass: Unit tests are foundational but insufficient to guarantee a complex application will perform reliably in production, especially when the system is already indicating instability (exhausted error budget). Passing unit tests doesn't negate the risk signaled by the depleted error budget.

D. Deploy the feature to a subset of users, and gradually roll out to all users if there are no errors reported: This is the most balanced SRE approach in this situation. It acknowledges the urgency while attempting to mitigate risk:Risk Mitigation: A canary release (deploying to a small subset of users) limits the potential negative impact if the new feature introduces new errors or worsens existing instability.

Observation: It allows for careful monitoring of the new release in the production environment with real users.

Data-Driven Decision: The decision to proceed with a wider rollout is based on observed behavior ("if there are no errors reported"), not just assumptions.

Controlled Rollout: A gradual rollout allows for quick rollback if issues arise.

While an exhausted error budget signals a deployment freeze, critical business needs can sometimes necessitate a carefully managed exception. A canary release is a standard SRE technique for deploying changes with reduced risk, making it the most appropriate course of action when faced with such conflicting priorities. The team would also need to communicate clearly about the risks and the rationale for this exception. It's implied that this urgent feature might also fix existing issues or is critical enough to warrant the carefully managed risk.

Reference (Based on SRE principles from Google's SRE books and general practices):

Error Budgets: "The SRE Book" (Site Reliability Engineering: How Google Runs Production Systems) discusses error budgets and deployment freezes. An exhausted error budget typically means no more risky changes until reliability improves.

Canary Releases: This is a fundamental practice for safely deploying new versions. It's about testing in production with a small percentage of traffic.

Managing Risk: SRE is about managing risk, not eliminating it entirely. In situations like this, a calculated risk with strong mitigation (canary, monitoring, rollback plan) can be justified for critical business needs. The decision involves weighing the risk of deploying against the risk of not deploying the urgent feature.

Option D represents a pragmatic SRE approach to navigate this difficult situation by minimizing the blast radius of the change.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Google Cloud Trace is specifically designed to analyze request latency and identify performance bottlenecks across services. Since the issue is related to slow performance after a new release, the best approach is to use Cloud Trace to:

Visualize request latency across services

Pinpoint slow dependencies affecting response time

Analyze performance trends over time

????Why not other options?

B (Error Reporting)❌→ Focuses on uncaught exceptions and crashes, not latency issues.

C (Cloud Profiler)❌→ Helps with CPU and memory analysis, not request tracing.

D (Prometheus for Cloud Monitoring)❌→ Useful for metrics collection, but not ideal for debugging specific request latency issues.

????Official Reference:

Google Cloud Trace Overview

The correct answer is D. Review the design of the product with the product development team to provide feedback early in the design phase.

According to the Google Cloud DevOps best practices, a Site Reliability Engineer (SRE) should collaborate with the product development team from the beginning of the product lifecycle, not just after the product is deployed or tested. This way, the SRE can provide operational input on the product design, such as scalability, reliability, security, and cost efficiency. The SRE can also help define service level objectives (SLOs) and service level indicators (SLIs) for the product, as well as monitoring and alerting strategies. By collaborating early and often, the SRE and the product development team can ensure that the product meets the operational requirements and expectations of the customers.

Cloud Build Private Pools allow your builds to run in a secure, isolated environment with direct access to resources inside your private VPC network, without exposing them to the public internet. This is the Google-recommended approach for minimizing management overhead while maintaining strong security boundaries.

From the official documentation:

"Private pools run your builds in a dedicated and secure environment that can connect to private network resources."

— Cloud Build Private Pools Overview

"You can configure private pools to access resources in a VPC network, which enables secure access to services without using public IPs."

— Accessing Private Resources

This method eliminates the need to create and manage additional compute instances or complex load balancing setups, providing seamless integration with your private services during CI pipeline execution.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

The best approach to a joint-ownership DevOps model follows SRE and DevOps best practices, where:

The DevOps team manages infrastructure and is on-call for incidents.

The Software Development team owns SLOs and submits code.

Code reviews should be a shared responsibility to ensure both teams maintain quality.

????Why not other options?

A (DevOps team reviewing all code)❌→ Breaks DevOps best practices by making developers dependent on the DevOps team for code review.

B (DevOps does code reviews, developers handle incidents)❌→ Developers should not handle on-call duties unless part of a shared rotation.

C (Developers manage infrastructure)❌→ Developers should not be fully responsible for infrastructure.

????Official Reference:

SRE & DevOps Ownership Model

Shared Responsibility Model in Google Cloud

To speed up Docker builds, optimize layer caching. Google Cloud recommends using --cache-from with Artifact Registry, and placing frequently changed files late in the Dockerfile so earlier layers can be reused.

“Put instructions that are less likely to change (like installing packages) early in the Dockerfile, and more frequently changing lines (like copying app code) near the end.”

— Dockerfile Best Practices

“Use the --cache-from argument to pull layers from previously built images in Artifact Registry.”

— Cloud Build Docker Caching

This dramatically reduces build time by avoiding redundant rebuilds of static layers.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From General GKE and GitOps Knowledge:

The requirements are:

Enforce constraint templates (implying a policy agent like OPA Gatekeeper) on GKE.

Store policy parameters in a GitHub repository.

Automatically apply changes from the GitHub repository to the clusters.

This is a classic GitOps scenario.

A. Set up a GitHub action to trigger Cloud Build when there is a parameter change. In Cloud Build, run a gcloud CLI command to apply the change.This is a plausible CI/CD approach. GitHub Actions can trigger Cloud Build, which can then use kubectl or gcloud to apply configurations. However, this is a push-based imperative approach. GitOps tools offer a more declarative, pull-based model specifically designed for syncing Kubernetes configurations.  

B. When there is a change in GitHub, use a webhook to send a request to Cloud Service Mesh, and apply the change.Cloud Service Mesh (based on Istio) is primarily for managing traffic, security, and observability for microservices. It's not designed for applying general Kubernetes policy configurations like Gatekeeper constraints from a Git repository.  

C. Configure Config Sync with the GitHub repository. When there is a change in the repository, use Config Sync to apply the change.Config Sync is a Google Cloud product specifically designed for GitOps with GKE (and other Kubernetes clusters). It synchronizes configurations (including CustomResourceDefinitions for constraint templates and the constraints themselves) from a Git repository (like GitHub) to your clusters. It continuously monitors the repository and automatically applies any committed changes to the clusters, ensuring they remain in the desired state. This perfectly matches the requirements.  

D. Configure Config Connector with the GitHub repository. When there is a change in the repository, use Config Connector to apply the change.Config Connector allows you to manage Google Cloud resources (like Pub/Sub topics, Spanner instances, etc.) using Kubernetes-style declarative configurations and kubectl. While it uses Kubernetes tooling, its primary purpose is managing Google Cloud resources, not syncing general Kubernetes configurations like Gatekeeper constraints from Git. Config Sync is the tool for syncing arbitrary Kubernetes manifests from Git to a cluster.  

Config Sync is the Google Cloud tool built for the exact purpose described: maintaining consistency between Kubernetes cluster configurations and a Git repository using a GitOps model.

Reference (Based on Google Cloud GKE and Config Sync documentation):

Config Sync Overview: https://cloud.google.com/anthos-config-management/docs/config-sync-overview or https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/add-on/config-sync/overview (if referring to it as a GKE add-on). "Config Sync is a GitOps tool that helps you keep your Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) Enterprise edition clusters synchronized with configs stored in a Git repository."  

It supports syncing various Kubernetes objects, including CustomResources, which are used by OPA Gatekeeper for defining constraints and constraint templates.

It automatically pulls changes from the Git repository and applies them, which meets the "automatically applied when changes occur" requirement.

 The best option for implementing guard rails on all GKE clusters to only allow the deployment of trusted and approved images is to use Binary Authorization to attest images during your CI/CD pipeline. Binary Authorization is a feature that allows you to enforce signature-based validation when deploying container images. You can use Binary Authorization to create policies that specify which images are allowed or denied in your GKE clusters. You can also use Binary Authorization to attest images during your CI/CD pipeline by using tools such as Container Analysis or third-party integrations. An attestation is a digital signature that certifies that an image meets certain criteria, such as passing vulnerability scans or code reviews. By using Binary Authorization to attest images during your CI/CD pipeline, you can ensure that only trusted and approved images are deployed to your GKE clusters.

The correct answer is C. Change the machine type for your VMs to n2-standard-8.

According to the Google Cloud documentation, the network throughput performance of a Compute Engine VM depends on its machine type1. The n2-standard-2 machine type has a maximum egress bandwidth of 4 Gbps, which can be a bottleneck for serving large files. By changing the machine type to n2-standard-8, you can increase the maximum egress bandwidth to 16 Gbps, which can improve the network throughput performance and reduce the download time for users.You also need to enable per VM Tier_1 networking performance, which is a feature that allows VMs to achieve higher network performance than the default settings2.

The other options are incorrect because they do not improve the network throughput performance of your VMs.Option A is incorrect because Cloud NAT is a service that allows private IP addresses to access the internet, but it does not increase the network bandwidth or speed3.Option B is incorrect because adding additional network interfaces (NICs) or IP addresses per NIC does not increase ingress or egress bandwidth for a VM1.Option D is incorrect because deploying the Ops Agent can help you monitor and troubleshoot your VMs, but it does not affect the network throughput performance4.

Cloud Workstations provides a secure way to preview web applications using built-in preview links, which expose internal ports only via authenticated and authorized access — no public IP exposure required.

“To preview your app, click the preview icon in the Code OSS panel, which securely tunnels the service to your browser.”

— Cloud Workstations - Previewing your app

This adheres to Google's security best practices by avoiding public IPs or manual tunneling while enabling developer efficiency.

The correct answer is B. Cloud Infrastructure (Terraform) repository is shared: different directories are different environments. GKE Infrastructure (Anthos Config Management Kustomize manifests) repositories are separated: different branches are different environments. Application (app source code) repositories are separated: different branches are different features.

This answer follows the best practices for using Terraform and Anthos Config Management with GitOps, as described in the following sources:

For Terraform, it is recommended to use a single repository for all environments, and use directories to separate them. This way, you can reuse the same Terraform modules and configurations across environments, and avoid code duplication and drift.You can also use Terraform workspaces to isolate the state files for each environment12.

For Anthos Config Management, it is recommended to use separate repositories for each environment, and use branches to separate the clusters within each environment. This way, you can enforce different policies and configurations for each environment, and use pull requests to promote changes across environments.You can also use Kustomize to create overlays for each cluster that apply specific patches or customizations34.

For application code, it is recommended to use separate repositories for each application, and use branches to separate the features or bug fixes for each application. This way, you can isolate the development and testing of each application, and use pull requests to merge changes into the main branch.You can also use tags or labels to trigger deployments to different environments5.

The best option for ensuring that the three environments are consistent and following Google-recommended practices is to use Cloud Build to render and deploy the network policies and the DaemonSet, and set up Config Sync to sync the configurations for the three environments. Cloud Build is a service that executes your builds on Google Cloud infrastructure. You can use Cloud Build to render and deploy your network policies and DaemonSet as code using tools like Kustomize, Helm, or kpt. Config Sync is a feature that enables you to manage the configurations of your GKE clusters from a single source of truth, such as a Git repository. You can use Config Sync to sync the configurations for your development, staging, and production environments and ensure that they are consistent.

The correct answer is B. Increase the memory limit in the application deployment.

The application is experiencing a memory leak, which means that it is allocating memory that is not freed or reused. This causes the heap usage to grow constantly until it reaches the memory limit of the pod, which triggers a restart by Kubernetes. Increasing the memory limit in the application deployment can help mitigate the problem by allowing the application to run longer before reaching the limit. However, this is not a permanent solution, as the memory leak will still occur and eventually exhaust the available memory.The best solution is to identify and fix the source of the memory leak in the application code, using tools like Cloud Profiler and pprof12.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From General Google Cloud IAM and Organization Policy Knowledge:

The core requirement is to prevent accidental deletion of a Shared VPC host project, even by project owners, by ensuring that only users with a specific permission at the organization level can remove the lien that protects the project.

A lien (resourcemanager.projects.delete) has already been placed on the project. This prevents its deletion. The challenge is to prevent the removal of this lien by project-level administrators.

The permission to remove a lien is resourcemanager.projectLiens.update (or resourcemanager.projects.updateLiens as stated in the question, which implies a broader update capability including liens).

Option A (Enable VPC Service Controls for the container.googleapis.com API service): VPC Service Controls are for data exfiltration prevention by creating service perimeters. They do not directly control IAM permissions for lien management or project deletion.

Option B (Revoke the resourcemanager.projects.updateLiens permission from all users associated with the project): While this would prevent project-level users from removing the lien, it doesn't enforce therequirement that only users with this permission at the organization level can remove it. A project owner could potentially re-grant themselves this permission at the project level if not otherwise restricted. The goal is a stronger, centrally enforced restriction.

Option C (Enable the compute.restrictXpnProjectLienRemoval organization policy constraint): This is specifically designed for the scenario described.Organization Policies allow centralized control over resource configurations across the organization.

The compute.restrictXpnProjectLienRemoval constraint, when enforced (set to True), restricts the removal of liens on Shared VPC host projects. Only users who have the resourcemanager.projectLiens.update permission (or resourcemanager.projects.updateLiens) granted at the organization level can then remove such liens. This prevents project owners or other project-level principals from removing the lien unless they also have this specific permission at the org level.

Option D (Instruct teams to only perform IAM permission management as code with Terraform): While Infrastructure as Code (IaC) is a good practice for managing IAM, it's an operational guideline and doesn't technically enforce the restriction on lien removal. A user with sufficient project-level IAM permissions could still manually remove the lien via the console or gcloud if not prevented by an organization policy.

Therefore, enabling the compute.restrictXpnProjectLienRemoval organization policy is the direct and most effective way to meet the requirement.

Reference (Based on Google Cloud Organization Policy and Shared VPC documentation):

Google Cloud documentation on Resource Manager Liens: https://cloud.google.com/resource-manager/docs/project-liens

Google Cloud documentation on Organization Policy Constraints: https://cloud.google.com/resource-manager/docs/organization-policy/org-policy-constraints

Specifically, the compute.restrictXpnProjectLienRemoval constraint: "When set to true, liens on Shared VPC host projects can only be removed by users that have resourcemanager.projectLiens.update permission on the organization." (or similar wording indicating org-level permission is required). This constraint ensures that the protection afforded by the lien on a critical Shared VPC host project cannot be easily circumvented at the project level.

The best options for creating a CI/CD pipeline in Cloud Build to build an application container image and ensuring that production image builds are only run against the main branch and that the change control team approves all pushes to the main branch are to create a trigger on the Cloud Build job, set the repository event setting to Push to a branch, and configure a branch protection rule for the main branch on the repository. A trigger is a resource that starts a build when an event occurs, such as a code change. By creating a trigger on the Cloud Build job and setting the repository event setting to Push to a branch, you can ensure that the image build is only run when code is pushed to a specific branch, such as the main branch. A branch protection rule is a rule that enforces certain policies on a branch, such as requiring reviews, status checks, or approvals before merging code. By configuring a branch protection rule for the main branch on the repository, you can ensure that the change control team approves all pushes to the main branch.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

The delay in initiating on-premises deployments is likely caused by slow artifact retrieval. Using a local artifact repository:

Reduces dependency on external storage (e.g., Artifact Registry in GCP).

Speeds up deployments by ensuring artifacts are read from a closer, low-latency source.

????Why not other options?

A (Blue-green deployment strategy)❌→ Helps with zero-downtime deployments but doesn’t address slow initiation.

B (Upgrading CPUs and memory)❌→ CPU/RAM are not the issue (since resource utilization is normal).

C (Increasing Jenkins executor threads)❌→ Would help only if Jenkins was the bottleneck, but the issue is artifact retrieval.

????Official Reference:

Best Practices for Artifact Management in Jenkins

The best option for deploying a containerized web application to Google Cloud with the given acceptance criteria is to use Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) with Anthos Service Mesh. GKE is a managed service for running Kubernetes clusters on Google Cloud, and Anthos Service Mesh is a service mesh that provides observability, traffic management, and security features for microservices. With Anthos Service Mesh, you can use traffic splitting to direct traffic from Android devices to an Android-specific microservice by configuring the user-agent header in the virtual service. You can also use traffic splitting to direct arbitrary percentage-based traffic to different versions of any microservice for continuous testing. For example, you can use a canary release strategy to direct 10% of user traffic to a new version of a microservice and monitor its performance and reliability.

The best option for making the third-party application work while following Google-recommended security practices is to add a rule to set the iam.disableServiceAccountKeyCreation policy to off in your project and create a key. The iam.disableServiceAccountKeyCreation policy is an organization policy that controls whether service account keys can be created in a project or organization. By default, this policy is set to on, which means that service account keys cannot be created. However, you can override this policy at a lower level, such as a project, by adding a rule to set it to off. This way, you can create a service account key for your project without affecting other projects or organizations. You should also follow the best practices for managing service account keys, such as rotating them regularly, storing them securely, and deleting them when they are no longer needed.

https://cloud.google.com/logging/docs/access-control

The logging.configWriter role grants permissions to create, update, and delete log exports. This is the correct role to give team members who need to export logs2.