Microsoft AI-102 Exam Dumps - Actual Questions Answers

The requirements state:

All AI solution responses must have a confidence score ≥ 70%.

If the response confidence score is < 70%, the response must be improved by human input.

Members of the Consultant-Bookkeeper group must be able to process financial documents, which includes performing manual review when the AI confidence is below threshold.

Looking at the provided JSON:

" fields " : {

" ReceiptType " : {

" type " : " string " ,

" valueString " : " Itemized " ,

" confidence " : 0.672

},

" MerchantName " : {

" type " : " string " ,

" valueString " : " Tailwind " ,

" confidence " : 0.913

}

}

ReceiptType.confidence = 0.672 → this is below 0.7.

MerchantName.confidence = 0.913 → this is above 0.7.

Therefore, the correct condition for triggering manual review is:

documentResults.fields. < field > .confidence < 0.7

Now, evaluating the options:

A. documentResults.docType == " prebuilt:receipt "

Always true for receipts, does not check confidence. Not correct.

B. documentResults.fields.*.confidence < 0.7

This is the correct general expression: trigger manual review whenever any field confidence is below 0.7.

C. documentResults.fields.ReceiptType.confidence > 0.7

This would bypass manual review when ReceiptType has high confidence. The requirement is to trigger review when confidence < 0.7, so this is the opposite.

D. documentResults.fields.MerchantName.confidence < 0.7

This only checks one field (MerchantName). In the JSON, MerchantName has confidence 0.913 ( > 0.7), so this condition would not trigger, but ReceiptType clearly needs review. Too narrow.

Correct Answer: B. documentResults.fields.*.confidence < 0.7

Microsoft References

Azure AI Document Intelligence – Confidence scores

Human-in-the-loop for Document Intelligence

Box 1: Cognitive Service User

Ensure that the members of a group named Management-Accountants can approve the FAQs.

Approve=publish.

Cognitive Service User (read/write/publish): API permissions: All access to Cognitive Services resource except for ability to:

1. Add new members to roles.

2. Create new resources.

Box 2: Cognitive Services QnA Maker Editor

Ensure that the members of a group named Consultant-Accountants can create and amend the FAQs.

QnA Maker Editor: API permissions:

1. Create KB API

2. Update KB API

3. Replace KB API

4. Replace Alterations

5. " Train API " [in new service model v5]

Box 3: Cognitive Services QnA Maker Read

Ensure that the members of a group named the Agent-CustomerServices can browse the FAQs.

QnA Maker Read: API Permissions:

1. Download KB API

2. List KBs for user API

3. Get Knowledge base details

4. Download Alterations

Generate Answer

Box 1: " categories " : [ " Locations " , " Persons " , " Organizations " ],

Locations, Persons, Organizations are in the outputs.

Scenario: Contoso plans to develop a searchable knowledgebase of all the intellectual property

Note: The categories parameter is an array of categories that should be extracted. Possible category types: " Person " , " Location " , " Organization " , " Quantity " , " Datetime " , " URL " , " Email " . If no category is provided, all types are returned.

Box 2: { " name " : " entities " }

The include wikis, so should include entities in the outputs.

Note: entities is an array of complex types that contains rich information about the entities extracted from text, with the following fields

name (the actual entity name. This represents a " normalized " form)

wikipediaId

wikipediaLanguage

wikipediaUrl (a link to Wikipedia page for the entity)

etc.