APS Accredited Payables Specialist (APS) Certification Exam Questions and Answers

TheInvoicestopic in the APS Certification Program covers double-entry accounting for recording invoices. When an incoming invoice is received, it represents an obligation to pay a vendor (a liability) and an expense (or asset, depending on the purchase). The correct journal entry is todebit the expense account(to recognize the cost incurred) andcredit the accounts payable (AP) liability account(to record the amount owed).

Option A (A debit to the asset account and a corresponding debit to the expense account): Incorrect, as recording an invoice does not typically involve debiting both an asset and an expense account. An asset might be debited for capital purchases, but the second debit to an expense account is invalid, and no credit is provided to balance the entry.

Option B (A credit to the AP liability account and a corresponding credit to the expense account): Incorrect, as crediting the expense account would reduce expenses, which is not the purpose of recording an invoice. Additionally, two credits do not form a valid journal entry without a debit.

Option C (A debit to expense and a credit to the AP liability account): Correct. Debiting the expense account (e.g., utilities, supplies) recognizes the cost incurred, and crediting the AP liability account records the obligation to pay the vendor. This is the standard entry for expense-related invoices.

Option D (A credit to expense and a debit to the AP liability account): Incorrect, as crediting the expense account would decrease expenses, which is not appropriate when recording an invoice. Debiting the AP liability would also incorrectly increase the liability.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underInvoicesexplains, “When an invoice is received, the journal entry debits an expense account (or asset for capital purchases) andcredits the accounts payable liability account to reflect the obligation.” The training video illustrates this with examples, such as debiting “Office Supplies Expense” and crediting “Accounts Payable” for a supply invoice, emphasizing accurate recording to ensure financial statement integrity.

Potential red flags for T&E expenses that fall outside of company policy includecharges for airline upgrades(Option I), which may indicate unauthorized luxury spending, andweekend stays(Option III), which could suggest personal travel disguised as business-related. These expenses often require additional scrutiny to ensure compliance with T&E policies.Cab fares(Option II) are typically routine and not inherently a red flag unless excessive or unsupported, making them less likely to be a policy violation compared to upgrades or weekend stays.

The web source from SAP Concur states: “Red flags in T&E expenses include charges for airline upgrades, which may violate policy on allowable travel classes, and weekend stays, which could indicate personal travel.” This supports Options I and III. Cab fares are noted as common expenses that require receipts but are not typically flagged unless unusual, per the Esker source: “Routine expenses like cab fares are less likely to be red flags compared to upgrades or extended stays.”

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Travel and Entertainment (T&E),” emphasizing fraud detection and policy compliance. The curriculum’s focus on “peer-tested best practices” aligns with identifying airline upgrades and weekend stays as potential red flags.

TheVendor Master Filetopic in the APS Certification Program underscores the need for careful management of VMF changes due to the high risk of fraud.Many instances of fraud, such as redirecting payments to fraudulent accounts, are enabled by unauthorized or unverified changes to vendor data (e.g., bank account details), making rigorous controls essential.

Option A (Internal audit generally oversees this process and they must be consulted first): Incorrect. While internal audit may review VMF changes, they do not typically oversee the process directly; AP owns the VMF.

Option B (Many instances of fraud are enabled by changes in the VMF): Correct. Fraudulent changes, like altering bank details, are a common fraud vector, necessitating strict controls.

Option C (This task is generally performed by those who have little training on data entry): Incorrect. VMF changes are typically handled by trained AP staff, not untrained personnel.

Option D (Some AP software solutions have been shown to corrupt data during this process): Incorrect. There is no evidence in IOFM materials suggesting widespread software corruption issues specific to VMF changes.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underVendor Master Filestates, “Special care is required for VMF changes because many fraud schemes involve altering vendor data, such as bank accounts, to divert payments.” The training video emphasizes, “Fraud is often enabled by unauthorized VMF changes, requiring strict verification and audit trails.”

TheVendor Master Filetopic in the APS Certification Program outlines the goals of a vendor management program, which include preventing duplicate payments, ensuring compliance with laws (e.g., IRS reporting), and collecting spend data for procurement.Streamlining sales and use tax processes, while related to AP, is typically handled through tax compliance systems or purchasing processes, not the vendor management program, which focuses on vendor data and relationships.

Option A (Reducing duplicate payments): A key goal, achieved by maintaining accurate vendor master file data to avoid duplicate vendor entries.

Option B (Streamlining sales and use tax process): Not a primary goal. Sales tax processes are managed separately, often through AP or procurement systems, not the vendor management program. Correct answer.

Option C (Collecting spend information for procurement): A goal, as vendor management provides data on spending patterns, aiding procurement negotiations.

Option D (Compliance with laws and regulations): A goal, ensuring vendor data supports IRS reporting (e.g., 1099s) and sanction list compliance.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underVendor Master Filestates, “Vendor management programs aim to reduce duplicate payments, ensure regulatory compliance, and collect spend data for procurement, but sales tax processes are typically managed outside vendor management.” The training video notes, “Vendor management focuses on accurate data to prevent errors like duplicates and support compliance, not directly on tax processes.”

Protecting confidential data in accounts payable requires secure practices to prevent unauthorized access. Locking your computer when leaving your work area (Option A), turning off your monitor and securing papers when approached (Option C), and shredding or securely disposing of unneeded documents (Option D) are recommended techniques to safeguard sensitive information. However, saving reports to a portable USB drive and giving it to a requestor (Option B) is not recommended, as USB drives are easily lost, stolen, or compromised, posing a significant security risk compared to secure email or file-sharing systems.

The web source from Esker states: “To protect confidential AP data, lock computers when unattended, secure physical documents, and use secure disposal methods. Avoid using portable devices like USB drives for data transfer due to security risks.” This directly supports Options A, C, and D, while identifying Option B as an insecure practice.

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Internal Controls,” including data security practices. The curriculum’s emphasis on “peer-tested best practices” aligns with secure data handling, ruling out the use of USB drives for sensitive reports.

Value Added Tax (VAT) invoices are subject to strict regulatory requirements, as they impact taxreporting and compliance. When a VAT invoice contains a billing error (e.g., incorrect amount, tax rate, or details), the recommended solution is to withhold payment and return the invoice to the vendor for correction. This ensures that the corrected invoice complies with VAT regulations, allowing accurate tax reporting and reclaiming of input VAT. Paying an incorrect invoice or reporting the error to the VAT administration without correction risks non-compliance and audit issues.

The web source from Avalara explains: “If a VAT invoice is incorrect, it must be corrected by the supplier issuing a new invoice or a credit note, depending on the nature of the error.” This aligns with the option to return the invoice to the vendor for correction. Paying the incorrect amount (Option B) or short/overpaying with an explanation (Option D) can complicate VAT reconciliation and may not be accepted by tax authorities, as the invoice must accurately reflect the transaction. Reporting the transaction to the VAT administration (Option A) is unnecessary unless the error involves fraud or persistent issues, and it does not resolve the invoice discrepancy.

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Tax and Regulatory Compliance,” including VAT compliance and invoice handling. While the specific question is not directly quoted in the provided sources, IOFM’s curriculum emphasizes compliance with tax regulations, as noted in the program description: “Review peer-tested best practices for each phase of the payment process – from receipt of invoice, through processing and payment.” The focus on accurate invoice processing supports returning the invoice for correction as the standard practice.

TheInternal Controlstopic in the IOFM APS Certification Program covers the design and implementation of internal controls to mitigate risks. When ideal controls (e.g., full segregation of duties) are not feasible due to resource constraints or organizational structure,compensating controlsare implemented as alternative measures to achieve similar risk mitigation. These controlsprovide additional checks or oversight to compensate for the absence of primary controls.

Option A (Interim controls): Interim controls imply temporary measures, not necessarily designed to compensate for missing ideal controls. This is incorrect.

Option B (Stop-gap controls): Stop-gap controls are ad-hoc, temporary fixes, not a formal term in the COSO framework or AP practices. This is incorrect.

Option C (Secondary controls): Secondary controls are not a recognized term in internal control frameworks; they imply less critical controls, not alternatives. This is incorrect.

Option D (Compensating controls): Correct. Compensating controls are alternative measures implemented when ideal controls are not practical, ensuring adequate risk mitigation.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underInternal Controlsstates, “When ideal controls cannot be implemented, compensating controls provide alternative risk mitigation, such as additional reviews or approvals to address control gaps.” The training video discusses compensating controls in the context of COSO and SOX, noting their use in small organizations where segregation of duties is challenging.

TheInternal Controlstopic in the APS Certification Program highlights the importance of a sound records management plan for AP processes, particularly for compliance, security, and financialanalysis. A records management plan ensures that documents (e.g., invoices, vendor data) are organized, secure, and accessible, supporting legal protection, information security, and expenditure analysis.

Item I (To afford some protection against lawsuits): A records management plan ensures documentation is available to defend against legal claims, such as vendor disputes or audits, providing evidence of compliance. This is a valid reason.

Item II (To safeguard vital information): Records management protects sensitive data (e.g., vendor TINs, payment details) from loss or unauthorized access, ensuring confidentiality and compliance. This is a valid reason.

Item III (To analyze and manage expenditures): Records management enables AP to track and analyze spending patterns, supporting budgeting and cost control. This is a valid reason.

Option A (III only): Incorrect, as Items I and II are also valid reasons.

Option B (I and II only): Incorrect, as Item III is also a valid reason.

Option C (I, II, and III): Correct, as all three items are reasons for a sound records management plan.

Option D (I only): Incorrect, as Items II and III are also valid reasons.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underInternal Controlsstates, “A sound records management plan protects against lawsuits by maintaining auditable records, safeguards vital information like vendor data, and enables expenditure analysis for cost management.” The training video discusses records management as a critical control, citing its role in legal compliance, data security, and financial oversight.

The tolerance level for discrepancies between a purchase order (PO) and an invoice refers to the acceptable variance (e.g., in price or quantity) that an organization allows before requiring additional approval or investigation. Keeping this tolerance level confidential is critical to prevent vendor fraud, as vendors could exploit knowledge of the tolerance to submit invoices with intentional discrepancies just within the acceptable range, leading to overpayments or unauthorized charges.

The web source from NetSuite highlights the importance of internal controls in invoice matching: “Three-way matching is an AP process used to verify a supplier invoice by checking it against its corresponding purchase order and order receipt. It reduces the chances of fraudulent invoices going undetected and, worse, being paid.” While this source does not explicitly address confidentiality of tolerance levels, the emphasis on fraud prevention implies that exposing tolerance thresholds could undermine these controls. If vendors know the tolerance, they might adjust invoices to exploit it, bypassing scrutiny.

Options B, C, and D are incorrect. Keeping procurement alert (Option B) is a general goal but not directly tied to confidentiality of tolerance levels. Avoiding internal audit scrutiny (Option C) is not a legitimate reason, as internal audits ensure compliance. Option D (depositing overages into a fund) is unethical and unrelated to accounts payable processes.

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Internal Controls,” which includes measures toprevent fraud and ensure accurate invoice processing. The program’s focus on “peer-tested best practices” and fraud prevention, as noted in the curriculum description, supports the need to keep tolerance levels confidential to safeguard against vendor manipulation.

The Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (Check 21), passed in 2003, enables banks to process checks electronically by allowing check truncation, where a physical check can be converted into a digital image (substitute check) at any point in the clearing process. This expedites check clearing and reduces costs associated with physical check handling. The law was enacted after September 11, 2001, partly in response to disruptions in check processing caused by grounded air transport post-9/11.

The web source from Tipalti states: “Check 21, passed in 2003, allows check truncation by converting checks into electronic images, speeding up the clearing process.” The other options areincorrect:

The Patriot Act (B)focuses on anti-terrorism and money laundering.

Gramm-Leach-Bliley (C)addresses financial privacy and was passed in 1999.

Sarbanes-Oxley (D)deals with corporate governance and financial reporting, passed in 2002.

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Tax and Regulatory Compliance,” including regulations affecting payment processes. The curriculum’s emphasis on “peer-tested best practices” includes understanding laws like Check 21 that impact check processing.

ThePaymentstopic in the APS Certification Program includes understanding the types of accounts involved in AP transactions, such as assets, liabilities, and expenses. Fixed assets are long-term, tangible assets used in business operations, such as furniture and fixtures, which are not intended for sale. Accounts receivable and inventory, however, are not fixed assets; they are current assets, as they are expected to be converted to cash within a year.

Item I (Accounts receivable): Accounts receivable represent money owed to the organization by customers for goods or services sold. They are classified ascurrent assets, not fixed assets, because they are short-term and liquid. This item is not a fixed asset.

Item II (Furniture and fixtures): Furniture and fixtures (e.g., desks, chairs, office equipment) are tangible, long-term assets used in business operations. They are classified asfixed assetsbecause they have a useful life exceeding one year and are not intended for sale. This item is a fixed asset.

Item III (Inventory): Inventory consists of goods held for sale or use in production. It is classified as acurrent assetbecause it is expected to be sold or used within a year. This item is not a fixed asset.

Option A (I, II, and III): Incorrect, as only II is a fixed asset; I and III are current assets.

Option B (I and II only): Incorrect, as I (accounts receivable) is not a fixed asset.

Option C (II only): Correct, as furniture and fixtures (II) are the only fixed asset among the options.

Option D (I and III only): Incorrect, as neither I (accounts receivable) nor III (inventory) are fixed assets.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underPaymentscovers basic accounting principles, including the classification of assets. It defines fixed assets as “tangible assets with a useful life of more than one year, such as furniture, fixtures, and equipment, used in business operations.” The text distinguishes fixed assets from current assets like accounts receivable and inventory, which are “expected to be converted to cash or used within a year.” The training video reinforces this by discussing how AP processes payments for fixed assets (e.g., capital expenditures) versus current assets (e.g., inventory purchases).

Data security in accounts payable requires a comprehensive approach involvinghardware(Option I, e.g., secure servers and firewalls),software(Option II, e.g., encryption tools and authentication systems), andhuman resources(Option III, e.g., employee training on security protocols and access management). All three components are essential to protect sensitive financial data from breaches and unauthorized access.

The web source from Corcentric states: “Effective data security in AP combines hardware, such as secure servers, software, like encryption and access controls, and human resources, through training and policy enforcement, to safeguard sensitive information.” This supports Option D, as all three elements are integral to data security.

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Internal Controls,” emphasizing a multi-faceted approach to data security. The curriculum’s focus on “peer-tested best practices” aligns with using hardware, software, and human resources to ensure robust security.

In thePaymentsandInvoicestopics of the IOFM APS Certification Program, double-entry accounting principles are covered to ensure AP professionals understand how transactions are recorded. When an invoice is paid, the organization settles an accounts payable (AP) liability, which is a balance sheet account representing money owed to vendors. The payment typically involves a cash outflow (or reduction in a bank account) and a corresponding reduction in the AP liability.

In double-entry accounting, every transaction affects at least two accounts, with debits equaling credits. The process of paying an invoice involves:

When the invoice isreceived, the AP department records the liability by debiting an expense account (or asset, depending on the purchase) and crediting the AP liability account. This step is not the focus of the question.

When the invoice ispaid, the AP liability is reduced, and cash is reduced. The correct journal entry is:

Debit Accounts Payable (AP liability): This reduces the liability, as the organization no longer owes the vendor.

Credit Cash: This reflects the outflow of cash used to settle the invoice.

Option A (Credit cash and debit the asset account): This is incorrect because paying an invoice does not typically involve debiting a generic “asset account.” The payment reduces the AP liability, not another asset account (unless the invoice was for an asset purchase, which is not specified). Additionally, crediting cash is correct, but the pairing is wrong.

Option B (Debit the expense and credit the AP liability account): This describes the journal entry when an invoice isreceived, not when it is paid. When recording an invoice, the expense (or asset) is debited, and the AP liability is credited. This option is incorrect for the payment stage.

Option C (Debit cash (asset) and credit the AP liability account): This is incorrect because debiting cash would imply an increase in the cash account, which does not occur when paying an invoice (cash decreases). The direction of the cash entry is reversed.

Option D (Credit cash and debit the AP liability account): This is the correct journal entry for paying an invoice. Debiting the AP liability reduces the amount owed to the vendor, and crediting cash reflects the payment made (cash decreases). This aligns with standard double-entry accounting principles.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The IOFM APS e-textbook and training video under thePaymentssection cover double-entry accounting for AP transactions. The curriculum explains that “when an invoice is paid, the accounts payable liability account is debited to reduce the obligation, and the cash account is credited to reflect the payment outflow.” This is reinforced in the practice quizzes, which test understanding of journal entries for invoice payments. The APS program also references best practices for cash management and payment processing, emphasizing accurate accounting to maintain financial integrity.

TheInternal Controlstopic in the IOFM APS Certification Program emphasizes the role of accounts payable (AP) in managing financial processes, ensuring compliance, and supporting organizational objectives. AP has a significant influence on several key areas, including vendor relationships (through timely payments and communication), cash management (by optimizing payment timing and methods), and financial statements (by ensuring accurate recording of liabilities and expenses). However, AP typically has minimal direct influence oninventory turnover, which is more closely tied to supply chain and inventory management functions.

Option A (Inventory turnover): Inventory turnover measures how quickly a company sells and replaces its inventory. While AP processes payments for inventory purchases, it does not directly control inventory levels, purchasing decisions, or sales velocity, which are managed by procurement and sales teams. This is the correct answer, as it is the exception.

Option B (Vendor relationships): AP directly influences vendor relationships by ensuring timely and accurate payments, resolving disputes, and maintaining vendor master file data. This is a core AP responsibility, so it is not the exception.

Option C (Cash management): AP plays a critical role in cash management by scheduling payments to optimize cash flow, using electronic payments, and implementing positive pay to prevent fraud. This is a key AP function, so it is not the exception.

Option D (Financial statements): AP impacts financial statements by recording invoices (affecting liabilities and expenses) and payments (affecting cash and liabilities). Accurate AP processes ensure reliable financial reporting, so this is not the exception.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underInternal Controlshighlights AP’s role in “supporting financial integrity through accurate transaction recording and cash flow management.” It notes that AP professionals manage vendor payments and cash outflows, directly affecting vendor relationships, cash management, and financial statement accuracy. However, inventory turnover is described as a supply chain metric, outside AP’s primary scope. The IOFM training video reinforces this by focusing on AP’s responsibilities in payment processing and financial reporting, with no mention of inventory turnover as a direct AP function.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS)Publication 463, titled "Travel, Gift, and Car Expenses," is the primary document that addresses travel and entertainment (T&E) expenses. It provides detailed guidance on what qualifies as deductible business travel, entertainment, and related expenses, including rules for substantiation, accountable plans, and per diem rates.

The web source from the IRS states: “Publication 463, Travel, Gift, and Car Expenses, explains what expenses are deductible, how to report them, and the rules for an accountable plan.” This directly supports Option B. The other options are incorrect:

Notice 1009 (A)does not exist in the context of T&E expenses.

Advisory 972 (C)is not a recognized IRS document.

Form 1046 (D)is not related to T&E; IRS forms like 1040 or 1099 are unrelated.

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Tax and Regulatory Compliance,” including IRS guidelines for T&E expenses. The curriculum’s focus on “peer-tested best practices” emphasizes familiarity with Publication 463 for compliance with T&E reporting requirements.

An accountable plan, as defined by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), is a reimbursement or allowance arrangement that meets specific requirements to ensure business expenses are properly documented and not treated as taxable income. One key requirement is that employees must adequately account for their expenses within a reasonable period. According to IRS guidelines, employees must submit expense reports or other documentation within 60 days after the expenses are incurred to meet the "reasonable period" standard.

The web source from the IRS states: “Under an accountable plan, employees must adequately account to the employer for their expenses within a reasonable period of time. The IRS considers 60 days after the expense was paid or incurred to be a reasonable period for accounting.” This directly supports Option B (60 days). The other options (120 days, 30 days, 90 days) do not align with the IRS’s specific timeframe for accounting under an accountable plan.

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Tax and Regulatory Compliance,” including IRS regulations related to expense reimbursements. The curriculum’s focus on “peer-tested best practices” and compliance with federal tax laws includes understanding the requirements of an accountable plan, such as the 60-day rule for expense accounting.

TheInvoicestopic in the APS Certification Program covers value-added tax (VAT) requirements for invoices, particularly for organizations operating in jurisdictions with VAT systems (e.g., EU countries). A VAT-acceptable invoice must include specific elements to comply with tax regulations, such as the customer’s VAT identification number, the date of issue, and the VAT rate applied. Thesupplier’s banking information, while useful for payment, is not a mandatory requirement for VAT compliance.

Option A (The customer’s VAT identification number): Required for cross-border transactions or business-to-business sales to verify VAT status and enable zero-rating or reverse charge. This is a mandatory element.

Option B (The date of invoice issue): Required to establish the tax point and ensure proper tax period reporting. This is a mandatory element.

Option C (The VAT rate applied): Required to specify the tax rate (e.g., standard, reduced) and calculate the VAT amount. This is a mandatory element.

Option D (The supplier’s banking information): Not required for VAT compliance. While banking details may be included for payment purposes, they are not part of VAT invoice requirements. Correct answer.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underInvoicesstates, “A VAT-acceptable invoice must include the customer’s VAT ID, date of issue, VAT rate, and other tax-related details, but supplier banking information is not required for compliance.” The training video discusses VAT invoicing for international transactions, listing mandatory elements and noting that “banking details are optional, as they relate to payment, not tax reporting.”

Evaluated Receipt Settlement (ERS) is a payment process that eliminates the need for a supplier invoice by triggering payments based on the purchase order (PO) and receiving documents (e.g., goods received note or delivery receipt). The PO establishes the agreed-upon terms, quantities, and prices, while the receipt confirms the actual delivery of goods or services. This allows payments to be processed without an invoice, streamlining the accounts payable process.

The web source from Esker states: “Evaluated Receipt Settlement (ERS) is a procedure for paying suppliers without requiring a paper invoice from the supplier… Payments are triggered by the receipt of goods or services against a purchase order.” The Corcentric source further clarifies: “ERS requires only the purchase order and receiving documents to initiate payment, eliminating the need for an invoice.” This directly supports Option B (PO and Receipt), as these are the two critical documents for ERS. Options A, C, and D are incorrect because they include the invoice, which is not required in ERS.

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Payments,” including ERS as an efficient payment method. The curriculum’s focus on “peer-tested best practices for each phase of the payment process” aligns with the industry standard that ERS relies on the PO and receipt.

TheTax and Regulatory Compliancetopic in the APS Certification Program covers IRS Form 1099 reporting requirements for payments to U.S. unincorporated service providers (e.g., independent contractors, freelancers). Payments for services totaling$600 or morein a calendar year must be reported on Form 1099-NEC (Nonemployee Compensation), ensuring the IRS can track income for tax purposes.

Option A ($600): Correct. The IRS requires Form 1099-NEC for payments of $600 or more to unincorporated U.S. service providers, such as individuals or partnerships, for services rendered.

Option B ($1,000): Incorrect. The $600 threshold applies, not $1,000.

Option C ($500): Incorrect. The threshold is $600, not $500.

Option D ($300): Incorrect. The threshold is $600, not $300.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underTax and Regulatory Compliancestates, “Payments of $600 or more to U.S. unincorporated service providers must be reported on Form 1099-NEC, per IRS regulations.” TheMaster Guide to Form 1099 Compliancespecifies, “The $600 threshold applies to nonemployee compensation paid to individuals, sole proprietors, or partnerships, requiring a 1099-NEC filing.” The training video reinforces this, noting, “AP ensures 1099-NEC forms are issued for payments of $600 or more to track contractor income.”

TheTax and Regulatory Compliancetopic in the IOFM APS Certification Program covers key U.S. regulations, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).Enacted in 1996, HIPAA is designed to protect the privacy and security ofprivate medical records, ensuring that protected health information (PHI) is safeguarded by healthcare providers, insurers, and related entities, including AP departments handling medical-related payments.

Option A (Corporate whistleblower identities): Incorrect. Whistleblower protections are covered under laws like the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, not HIPAA.

Option B (External auditor findings): Incorrect. Auditor findings are related to financial or operational audits, not protected by HIPAA.

Option C (Private medical records): Correct. HIPAA establishes standards to protect PHI, such as patient health records, from unauthorized disclosure.

Option D (Electronic banking information): Incorrect. Banking information is protected under laws like the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, not HIPAA.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underTax and Regulatory Compliancestates, “HIPAA protects private medical records, ensuring the confidentiality of protected health information (PHI) in transactions involving healthcare providers.” The training video mentions HIPAA in the context of AP compliance, noting that AP staff handling medical vendor payments must ensure PHI is secure.

TheVendor Master Filetopic in the APS Certification Program emphasizes fraud prevention through robust vendor validation processes. Key practices include confirming a vendor’s physical address, checking government sanction lists (e.g., OFAC), and requiring a W-9 to verify tax identification numbers (TINs). However,verifying that vendors are bonded(i.e., insured against financial loss) is not a standard requirement for vendor fraud prevention, as it is more relevant to specific industries (e.g., construction) and not universally applicable.

Option A (Confirmation of a physical address): Verifying a physical address ensures the vendor is a legitimate entity, reducing the risk of fraudulent shell companies. This is a key practice.

Option B (Verifying that vendors are bonded): Bonding is not a standard AP requirement for fraud prevention. It may apply to certain vendors (e.g., contractors), but it is not essential for all vendor fraud prevention programs. This is the correct answer.

Option C (Checking government sanction lists): Checking lists like OFAC (Office of Foreign Assets Control) ensures compliance with regulations and prevents payments to sanctioned entities, a critical fraud prevention step. This is a key practice.

Option D (Requiring a W-9): A W-9 provides the vendor’s TIN, enabling verification with the IRS to prevent fraudulent identities and ensure tax compliance. This is a key practice.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underVendor Master Filelists “confirming physical addresses, checking sanction lists, and requiring W-9 forms” as essential for vendor fraud prevention. It notes that “bonding is not a universal requirement for vendor validation,though it may be relevant for specific contracts.” The training video emphasizes vendor verification processes, highlighting address checks, sanction list reviews, and W-9 requirements but not bonding.

Evaluated Receipt Settlement (ERS) is a payment process where invoices are not required from the vendor. Instead, payment is triggered based on the purchase order (PO) and receiving documents, streamlining the accounts payable process by eliminating invoice processing. A successful ERS program relies on accurate POs and receiving data, standardized pricing, and clear terms with vendors. The exclusion of early pay discounts is a key feature, as ERS payments are typically made on a fixed schedule based on receipt of goods, not invoice terms that include discount incentives.

The web source from Esker explains: “Evaluated Receipt Settlement (ERS) is a procedure for paying suppliers without requiring a paper invoice from the supplier… Payments are triggered by the receipt of goods or services against a purchase order. ERS eliminates the need for supplier invoices, reducing errors and costs.” The source from Corcentric adds: “ERS is designed to streamline payments by using PO and receipt data, typically without early payment discounts, as payments are made on a predictable schedule.” Early pay discounts are excluded because ERS prioritizes automation and predictability over negotiating variable payment terms.

The other options are incorrect:

Billing of miscellaneous charges separately(Option A) complicates ERS, as it requires additional reconciliation outside the PO and receipt data.

Receiving a complete invoice with the shipment(Option B) contradicts the ERS model, which eliminates the need for invoices.

Use of pro forma purchase orders(Option D) is not standard, as ERS relies on firm POs, not provisional ones like pro forma POs.

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Payments,” including advanced payment methods like ERS. The curriculum’s focus on “peer-tested best practices for each phase of the payment process” aligns with the industry standard that ERS programs exclude early pay discounts to ensure streamlined, predictable payments.

ThePaymentstopic in the APS Certification Program covers accounting concepts like accrued expenses, which are critical for accurate financial reporting.Accrued expensesare expenses that have been incurred (i.e., the organization has received goods or services) but have not yet been paid or recorded (posted) in the accounts payable system, often because an invoice has not been received by the period’s end. These are recognized to match expenses with the period they relate to, per accrual accounting principles.

Option A (Forecasted expenses for which an invoice has not been received): Incorrect, as accrued expenses are not forecasted (estimated future costs); they are actual expenses already incurred.

Option B (Planned expenditures that have not been incurred): Incorrect, as planned but unincurred expenditures are not recognized in accounting until incurred.

Option C (Incurred expenses that have not been posted in the current period): Correct. Accrued expenses are costs incurred (e.g., utilities used) but not yet recorded or paid, oftendue to a missing invoice, and are accrued to ensure accurate period-end reporting.

Option D (Pre-paid expenses that were paid with petty cash): Incorrect, as pre-paid expenses are paid in advance and recorded as assets, not accrued expenses, which are unpaid liabilities.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underPaymentsdefines accrued expenses as “expenses incurred in the current period but not yet posted or paid, often recorded at period-end to reflect true financial obligations.” The training video provides examples, such as accruing wages or utilities when invoices are delayed, emphasizing the importance of accrual accounting for financial accuracy.

TheTax and Regulatory Compliancetopic in the IOFM APS Certification Program covers IRS penalties for 1099 filings and the criteria for penalty abatement under ‘reasonable cause.’ Reasonable cause can be established by demonstrating due diligence, such as obtaining a TIN match, documenting efforts to collect correct payee information, or outlining plans to improve future reporting. However,an error rate less than 5%is not a recognized IRS criterion for reasonable cause, as the IRS focuses on intent and effort, not specific error thresholds.

Option A (Proof of a successful TIN match prior to the date of assessment): Valid. A TIN match with the IRS verifies payee information, demonstrating due diligence, which supports reasonable cause for abatement.

Option B (Documentation showing the error rate to be less than 5% of total 1099s): Not valid. The IRS does not specify a percentage threshold (e.g., 5%) for penalty abatement. Reasonable cause depends on actions taken, not error rates. Correct answer.

Option C (The organization’s plan for improving the accuracy of future reporting): Valid. A documented plan to enhance compliance (e.g., improved TIN collection processes) shows intent to correct issues, supporting reasonable cause.

Option D (Steps the organization has taken in an attempt to obtain the correct payee information): Valid. Documenting efforts like requesting W-9 forms or sending B Notices demonstrates due diligence, a key factor for reasonable cause.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underTax and Regulatory Compliancestates, “IRS penalties for incorrect 1099 filings can be abated for reasonable cause, including proof of TIN matching, efforts to obtain correct payee data, and plans for future compliance.” TheMaster Guide to Form 1099 Complianceclarifies, “Reasonable cause does not include specific error rate thresholds like 5%; instead, it focuses on documented due diligence.” The training video reinforces this, noting that “TIN matches and W-9 solicitations are key to penalty abatement.”

ThePaymentstopic in the APS Certification Program covers best practices for handling rush payments, which require expedited processing while maintaining security and compliance. Acceptable practices include allowing vendors to pick up payments (with proper controls) and prioritizing electronic payments for speed and security.Mailing the paymentis generally not suitable for rush payments due to delivery delays.

Item I (Allow the payment to be picked up by the vendor): Acceptable, provided strict controls (e.g., ID verification) are in place to ensure the correct recipient collects the payment.

Item II (Insist on making the payment electronically): Acceptable and preferred, as electronic payments (e.g., ACH, wire transfers) are fast, secure, and trackable, ideal for rush scenarios.

Item III (Mail the payment): Not acceptable for rush payments, as mailing introduces delays (e.g., 2–5 days), undermining the urgency.

Option A (II and III only): Incorrect, as Item III is not suitable for rush payments.

Option B (I, II, and III): Incorrect, as Item III is not suitable.

Option C (I and II only): Correct, as Items I and II are acceptable rush payment practices.

Option D (I and III only): Incorrect, as Item III is not suitable.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underPaymentsstates, “For rush payments, electronic payments are preferred for speed and security, and vendor pickup is acceptable with controls, but mailing is not suitable due to delays.” The training video notes, “Rush payments should leverage ACH or wire transfers, or controlled pickup, avoiding mail to meet urgent deadlines.”

A substitute check, created under the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (Check 21), is a paper reproduction of the front and back of an original check, legally equivalent to the original for processing purposes. It is also known as animage replacement document (IRD), as it replaces the original check with a digital image-based substitute. This facilitates faster check clearing through electronic processing.

The web source from NetSuite states: “A substitute check, also known as an image replacement document (IRD), is a paper copy of the front and back of a check, legally equivalent to the original, created under Check 21.” This directly supports Option D. The other options are incorrect:

Electronic conversion order (A)is not a recognized term.

Surrogate financial instrument (B)is not a standard term for substitute checks.

Negotiated bank draft (C)refers to a different financial instrument.

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Payments,” including check processing and Check 21 regulations. The curriculum’s focus on “peer-tested best practices” aligns with the definition of a substitute check as an image replacement document.

Compliance in T&E processes requires robust systems to ensure financial accuracy and regulatory adherence.Accurate recordkeeping(Option I) is essential to document expenses, support financial reporting, and meet IRS and SOX requirements.Secure record retention(Option II) ensures that records are stored safely to protect sensitive data and comply with retention policies (e.g., IRS rules requiring records for at least three years).Traveler location tracking(Option III) is not a standard compliance requirement for T&E, as it relates more to employee safety or logistics, not financial or regulatory compliance.

The web source from Tipalti states: “T&E compliance requires accurate recordkeeping to support expense reporting and audits, as well as secure record retention to protect data and meet regulatory retention periods.” This supports Options I and II. Traveler location tracking is not mentioned as a compliance requirement in T&E processes, per the SAP Concur source: “Compliance in T&E focuses on documentation, approvals, and data security, not employee tracking.”

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Travel and Entertainment (T&E),” emphasizing compliance with financial and tax regulations. The curriculum’s focus on “peer-tested best practices” aligns with accurate recordkeeping and secure retention as key compliance processes.