Google Associate-Cloud-Engineer Exam Dumps - Actual Questions Answers

Let's analyze each option to find the one that meets the requirements of no startup time for new traffic, two idle instances, and minimal administrative overhead:

A. Unchecking "Serve this revision immediately" and using a traffic simulation tool: Unchecking "Serve this revision immediately" does prevent the new revision from receiving traffic immediately. However, manually using a traffic simulation tool adds administrative overhead. It also doesn't guarantee that two idle instances will be ready before traffic is shifted; you would need to monitor and adjust traffic manually based on the simulation.

B. Configuring service autoscaling and setting the minimum number of instances to 2: Service-level autoscaling applies to all revisions of the service. Setting the minimum instances at the service level would ensure at least two instances are running across all active revisions, not specifically for the new revision before traffic shift.

C. Configuring revision autoscaling for the new revision and setting the minimum number of instances to 2: This is the correct approach. By configuring revision autoscaling specifically for the new revision and setting the minimum number of instances to 2, Cloud Run will ensure that at least two instances of the new version are running and ready to serve traffic before you redirect any traffic to it. This eliminates startup latency when you do shift traffic. It also minimizes administrative overhead as Cloud Run manages the instance scaling based on this configuration.

D. Configuring revision autoscaling for the existing revision and setting the minimum number of instances to 2: This would ensure the existing version has at least two idle instances, which doesn't directly address the requirement of having idle instances ready for the new version before traffic redirection.

Google Cloud Documentation References:

Cloud Run Autoscaling: https://cloud.google.com/run/docs/configuring/min-instances - This document explains how to configure minimum and maximum instances for Cloud Run services and revisions. It clarifies that you can set minimum instances at the revision level to ensure instances are always ready.

Cloud Run Traffic Management: https://cloud.google.com/run/docs/managing/traffic - This describes how to deploy new revisions and gradually shift traffic between them. Combining minimum instances on the new revision with traffic splitting allows for zero-downtime deployments with pre-warmed instances.

===========

Navigate to Stackdriver Logging and select resource.labels.project_id=*. is not right.

Log entries are held in Stackdriver Logging for a limited time known as the retention period  which is 30 days (default configuration). After that, the entries are deleted. To keep log entries longer, you need to export them outside of Stackdriver Logging by configuring log sinks.

Ref: https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/gcp/best-practices-for-working-with-google-cloud-audit-logging

Configure a Cloud Scheduler job to read from Stackdriver and store the logs in BigQuery. Configure the table expiration to 60 days. is not right.

While this works, it makes no sense to use Cloud Scheduler job to read from Stackdriver and store the logs in BigQuery when Google provides a feature (export sinks) that does exactly the same thing and works out of the box.

Ref: https://cloud.google.com/logging/docs/export/configure_export_v2

Create a Stackdriver Logging Export with a Sink destination to Cloud Storage. Create a lifecycle rule to delete objects after 60 days. is not right.

You can export logs by creating one or more sinks that include a logs query and an export destination. Supported destinations for exported log entries are Cloud Storage, BigQuery, and Pub/Sub.

Ref: https://cloud.google.com/logging/docs/export/configure_export_v2

Sinks are limited to exporting log entries from the exact resource in which the sink was created: a Google Cloud project, organization, folder, or billing account. If it makes it easier to exporting from all projects of an organication, you can create an aggregated sink that can export log entries from all the projects, folders, and billing accounts of a Google Cloud organization.

Ref: https://cloud.google.com/logging/docs/export/aggregated_sinks

Either way, we now have the data in Cloud Storage, but querying logs information from Cloud Storage is harder than Querying information from BigQuery dataset. For this reason, we should prefer Big Query over Cloud Storage.

Create a Stackdriver Logging Export with a Sink destination to a BigQuery dataset. Configure the table expiration to 60 days. is the right answer.

You can export logs by creating one or more sinks that include a logs query and an export destination. Supported destinations for exported log entries are Cloud Storage, BigQuery, and Pub/Sub.

Ref: https://cloud.google.com/logging/docs/export/configure_export_v2

Sinks are limited to exporting log entries from the exact resource in which the sink was created: a Google Cloud project, organization, folder, or billing account. If it makes it easier to exporting from all projects of an organication, you can create an aggregated sink that can export log entries from all the projects, folders, and billing accounts of a Google Cloud organization.

Ref: https://cloud.google.com/logging/docs/export/aggregated_sinks

Either way, we now have the data in a BigQuery Dataset. Querying information from a Big Query dataset is easier and quicker than analyzing contents in Cloud Storage bucket. As our requirement is to Quickly analyze the log contents, we should prefer Big Query over Cloud Storage.

Also, You can control storage costs and optimize storage usage by setting the default table expiration for newly created tables in a dataset. If you set the property when the dataset is created, any table created in the dataset is deleted after the expiration period. If you set the property after the dataset is created, only new tables are deleted after the expiration period.

For example, if you set the default table expiration to 7 days, older data is automatically deleted after 1 week.

Ref: https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/docs/best-practices-storage

This is the most optimal solution. Rather than recreating all nodes, you create a new node pool with GPU enabled. You then modify the pod specification to target particular GPU types by adding node selector to your workloads Pod specification. YOu still have a single cluster so you pay Kubernetes cluster management fee for just one cluster thus minimizing the cost.

Ref: https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/gpus

Ref: https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/pricing

Example:

apiVersion: v1

kind: Pod

metadata:

name:my-gpu-pod

spec:

containers:

name:my-gpu-container

image: nvidia/cuda:10.0-runtime-ubuntu18.04

command: [/bin/bash]

resources:

limits:

nvidia.com/gpu: 2

nodeSelector:

cloud.google.com/gke-accelerator: nvidia-tesla-k80# or nvidia-tesla-p100 or nvidia-tesla-p4 or nvidia-tesla-v100 or nvidia-tesla-t4