Google Associate-Cloud-Engineer Exam Dumps - Actual Questions Answers

You write a lifecycle management rule in XML and push it to the bucket with gsutil lifecycle set config-xml-file. is not right.

gsutil lifecycle set enables you to set the lifecycle configuration on one or more buckets based on the configuration file provided. However, XML is not a valid supported type for the configuration file.

Ref: https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/gsutil/commands/lifecycle

Write a script that runs gsutil ls -lr gs://myapp-gcp-ace-logs/ to find and remove items older than 90 days. Repeat this process every morning. is not right.

This manual approach is error-prone, time-consuming and expensive. GCP Cloud Storage provides lifecycle management rules that let you achieve this with minimal effort.

Write a script that runs gsutil ls -l gs://myapp-gcp-ace-logs/ to find and remove items older than 90 days. Schedule the script with cron. is not right.

This manual approach is error-prone, time-consuming and expensive. GCP Cloud Storage provides lifecycle management rules that let you achieve this with minimal effort.

Write a lifecycle management rule in JSON and push it to the bucket with gsutil lifecycle set config-json-file. is the right answer.

You can assign a lifecycle management configuration to a bucket. The configuration contains a set of rules which apply to current and future objects in the bucket. When an object meets the criteria of one of the rules, Cloud Storage automatically performs a specified action on the object. One of the supported actions is to Delete objects. You can set up a lifecycle management to delete objects older than 90 days. gsutil lifecycle set enables you to set the lifecycle configuration on the bucket based on the configuration file. JSON is the only supported type for the configuration file. The config-json-file specified on the command line should be a path to a local file containing the lifecycle configuration JSON document.

Ref: https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/gsutil/commands/lifecycle

Ref: https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/lifecycle

The best option is to attach a single service account to the compute instances and add minimal rights to the service account. Then, allow the service account to impersonate a Cloud Identity user with elevated permissions to create, update, or delete resources. This way, the service account can use short-lived access tokens to authenticate to Google Cloud APIs without needing to manage service account keys. This option follows the principle of least privilege and reduces the risk of credential leakage and misuse.

Option A is not recommended because it requires human intervention, which can slow down the CI/CD pipeline and introduce human errors. Option C is not secure because it grants all required IAM permissions to a single service account, which can increase the impact of a compromised key. Option D is not cost-effective because it requires creating and managing multiple service accounts and keys, as well as using a secret manager service.

1: https://cloud.google.com/iam/docs/impersonating-service-accounts

2: https://cloud.google.com/iam/docs/best-practices-for-managing-service-account-keys

3: https://cloud.google.com/iam/docs/understanding-service-accounts

Let's analyze each option to find the one that meets the requirements of no startup time for new traffic, two idle instances, and minimal administrative overhead:

A. Unchecking "Serve this revision immediately" and using a traffic simulation tool: Unchecking "Serve this revision immediately" does prevent the new revision from receiving traffic immediately. However, manually using a traffic simulation tool adds administrative overhead. It also doesn't guarantee that two idle instances will be ready before traffic is shifted; you would need to monitor and adjust traffic manually based on the simulation.

B. Configuring service autoscaling and setting the minimum number of instances to 2: Service-level autoscaling applies to all revisions of the service. Setting the minimum instances at the service level would ensure at least two instances are running across all active revisions, not specifically for the new revision before traffic shift.

C. Configuring revision autoscaling for the new revision and setting the minimum number of instances to 2: This is the correct approach. By configuring revision autoscaling specifically for the new revision and setting the minimum number of instances to 2, Cloud Run will ensure that at least two instances of the new version are running and ready to serve traffic before you redirect any traffic to it. This eliminates startup latency when you do shift traffic. It also minimizes administrative overhead as Cloud Run manages the instance scaling based on this configuration.

D. Configuring revision autoscaling for the existing revision and setting the minimum number of instances to 2: This would ensure the existing version has at least two idle instances, which doesn't directly address the requirement of having idle instances ready for the new version before traffic redirection.

Google Cloud Documentation References:

Cloud Run Autoscaling: https://cloud.google.com/run/docs/configuring/min-instances - This document explains how to configure minimum and maximum instances for Cloud Run services and revisions. It clarifies that you can set minimum instances at the revision level to ensure instances are always ready.

Cloud Run Traffic Management: https://cloud.google.com/run/docs/managing/traffic - This describes how to deploy new revisions and gradually shift traffic between them. Combining minimum instances on the new revision with traffic splitting allows for zero-downtime deployments with pre-warmed instances.

===========