PECB ISO-45001-Lead-Auditor Exam Dumps - Actual Questions Answers

A first-party audit is an internal audit . ISO defines internal audits, or first-party audits, as audits conducted by, or on behalf of, the organization itself . That means the people participating can be the organization’s own auditors or external people acting on its behalf, such as a consultant. ( ISO )

Therefore:

A. An auditor certified by CQI and IRCA can participate in a first-party audit, provided the auditor is acting for the organization or on its behalf. Certification status does not prevent participation in an internal audit. This is consistent with the principle that first-party audits are defined by who the audit is for , not by the auditor’s credential. ( ISO )

D. An auditor from a consultant organisation can also participate, because first-party audits may be carried out on behalf of the organization by a qualified external consultant. ( ISO )

E. An auditor trained in the CQI and IRCA scheme can participate for the same reason: training route does not change the audit type; the audit remains first-party if it is conducted by or for the organization. ( ISO )

F. An auditor trained by the organisation clearly can participate, since internal audits are commonly performed by trained internal auditors from within the organization. ( ASQ )

The two that do not participate in a first-party audit are:

B. A certification body auditor

C. An auditor from an accreditation body

A certification body auditor performs a third-party audit , not a first-party audit. An accreditation body auditor/assessor evaluates certification bodies or similar conformity assessment bodies, not the organization’s own internal audit program. These are external oversight roles, not first-party audit roles. ( ISO )

So the correct answer is:

B, C

The correct answers are E, F, and H .

This situation raises three serious concerns: impartiality , professional conduct , and the reliability of the audit conclusion . Third-party auditors are expected to act honestly and impartially, and accepting gifts from the auditee is inconsistent with that expectation. The IAF auditor code of conduct says auditors must be honest and impartial and must avoid conduct that discredits the profession. ( IAF )

E is correct because the audit team leader must first consider whether the alleged behavior could compromise the validity of the audit findings and conclusion . If that risk is significant, the matter should be escalated to the individual(s) managing the audit programme for direction, since certification audits must remain competent, consistent, and impartial. ( ISO )

F is correct because the team leader should gather specific facts and then give the auditor an opportunity to respond to the allegations before deciding the next step. That is the appropriate immediate management action and is consistent with fair handling of an issue that could affect audit integrity. The concern is too serious to ignore, but it should still be examined on evidence, not assumption. ( ISO )

H is also correct because, while the matter is being addressed, moving the auditor in training away from the auditor concerned is a sensible control to protect the trainee and the audit process. It helps reduce further disruption and prevents the trainee from being exposed to more inappropriate conduct during the remainder of the audit. This is a practical audit-management response flowing from the team leader’s responsibility to maintain control of the audit team and audit activities. ( ISO )

Why the other options are not correct:

A is too immediate and inappropriate. The auditor in training cannot simply replace a qualified auditor without proper competence and authorization being confirmed.

B is premature. The audit should not be terminated immediately without first assessing the facts and the impact on the audit.

C is clearly wrong because the issue could affect the integrity of the current audit and cannot wait until later.

D is wrong and unethical; the tickets should not be accepted by anyone on the audit team. ( IAF )

G is wrong because experience does not excuse unethical or unprofessional behavior.

According to ISO 45001:2018, the PDCA cycle is explained in Clause 0.4. The Act phase is defined as: taking actions to improve continually the OH and S performance in order to achieve the intended outcomes . This clearly supports C. Making improvements as a correct answer.

Option D. Resetting objectives is also appropriate because ISO 45001 requires OH and S objectives to be reviewed and updated as appropriate . After checking performance results, the organization may revise or reset objectives as part of continual improvement and corrective action. This aligns with the Act stage, where changes are made to improve system effectiveness and performance.

The remaining options belong to other PDCA phases:

A. Verifying training relates more to evaluation of competence and effectiveness, which fits checking activities.

B. Measuring objectives belongs to the Check phase because ISO 45001 says Check includes monitoring and measurement against OH and S policy and objectives.

E. Providing infrastructure belongs to the Do phase because it is part of providing resources and operational support.

F. Auditing processes belongs to the Check phase because internal audits are part of performance evaluation under Clause 9.2.

Therefore, the correct answer is:

C, D