OMG OMG-OCUP2-FOUND100 Exam Dumps - Actual Questions Answers

For projects involving complex and strategic systems, a key advantage of developing models before starting implementation is that models help to establish a consensus among all the project stakeholders. Creating UML models in the early stages of a project provides a visual and conceptual representation of the system that can be easily understood by various stakeholders, including developers, managers, and clients. This facilitates discussions and negotiations about the system’s design and functionality, helping to ensure that all parties have a shared understanding and agreement on the project’s objectives and solutions before significant resources are invested in implementation.

To represent an instance of a class in a UML Object Diagram, the standard notation is to specify the instance name followed by a colon and the class name, and then list the attribute values within the compartment.

The class definition forCompanyspecifies that there is one attribute,name, of typeString.

An instance ofCompanywhere thenameattribute has the value "OMG" would be shown as follows:

InstanceName :ClassNameattributeName=attributeValue

In the provided options, Option D correctly represents an instance of theCompanyclass with thenameattribute set to "OMG". The name of the instance is not specified, which is allowed in UML when the instance name is not important or is understood from the context.

Thus, the correct answer is:

D. Option D

In UML, the aggregation kind 'composite' is one of the two types of aggregation, shared and composite. Composite aggregation, also known as composition, implies that the composed objects do not have a separate lifecycle from the owner object and are parts of the whole. This is in contrast to shared aggregation (aggregation), where the parts can be shared with different owners and have their own lifecycle.

Let's look at the options:

A. Composite aggregation implies ownership and is related to, but not equivalent to namespace containment. Namespace containment is more about the scope for named elements rather than lifecycle management.

B. While it's true that instances of the composed object's type are often associated only with the composite object, the key aspect of composite aggregation is not just the exclusive context but the lifecycle dependency, which is not captured in this option.

C. This option is correct because, in UML, composite aggregation (composition) implies that the parts are existentially dependent on the whole. When the composite (whole) object is destroyed, so are all of its parts, indicating a strong lifecycle dependency between the composite object and its composed parts.

D. This option describes a relationship more akin to set theory than UML composition. In UML, composite aggregation doesn't deal with subsets and unions in the context of set theory.

Thus, the most accurate answer, according to the UML specification regarding composite aggregation, isC: When the Property's composite object ceases to exist, all of its composed objects also cease to exist.