Pegasystems PEGACPLSA23V1 Exam Dumps - Actual Questions Answers

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Pega Cloud, as described in Pega Academy’sLead System Architect Missionand thePega Certified Lead System Architect Study Guide, is a managed cloud environment where Pega assumes specific responsibilities for infrastructure, security, and compliance, while clients manage application-level configurations. This is particularly critical for healthcare applications with stringent regulatory requirements.

Option A (Correct): Pega Cloud monitors the network and ensures system-level access control to protect patient information and maintain system integrity. This includes firewalls, intrusion detection, and network security, as outlined in thePega Cloud Servicessection of Pega Community.

Option B (Incorrect): While Pega installs the Pega Platform, the responsibility for installing additional Pega applications (e.g., industry-specific solutions) typically falls to the client or requires coordination via subscriptions. This is not a default Pega Cloud responsibility, per thePega Cloud Architecturemodule.

Option C (Correct): Pega Cloud securely stores data in a cloud repository, ensuring encryption and compliance with regulations like HIPAA for healthcare data. This is a core responsibility of Pega Cloud, as noted in theData Security in Pega Cloudmodule.

Option D (Correct): Pega Cloud oversees compliance, conducts security monitoring, and responds to security events to prevent breaches. This includes SOC 2 compliance and incident response, as documented in thePega Cloud Securitysection.

Option E (Incorrect): Authentication and authorization mechanisms (e.g., SSO, RBAC) are configured by the client within the Pega application, not managed by Pega Cloud. Pega provides the tools, but the client defines access policies, per theSecurity Designmodule.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Pega’s design patterns for limited availability and concurrency, as taught in Pega Academy’sApplication Design Missionand thePega Certified Lead System Architect Study Guide, leverage Pega’s built-in locking mechanisms to manage resource contention efficiently. Locking is the standard approach for ensuring concurrency control in scenarios like booking limited seats.

Option A (Correct): Using instance locking (e.g., optimistic or pessimistic locking) on data or case instances is the best approach. Pega Platform automatically manages concurrency by ensuring only one user or process can modify a locked instance, preventing conflicts. This is a core feature, as documented in theLocking Mechanismssection of Pega Community.

Option B (Incorrect): Using data instances with flags to manage locks and availability is overly complex and error-prone. Pega’s native locking mechanisms are more robust and eliminate the need for custom flag-based logic, per theConcurrency Designmodule.

Option C (Incorrect): While case instances can use locking, creating a case for each request is unnecessary unless the request requires a full case lifecycle. For simple resource allocation, data instance locking is sufficient, as noted in theCase Designguidelines.

Option D (Incorrect): Circumstancing the rule resolution algorithm does not address concurrency or availability. Circumstancing is for rule specialization, not resource management, per theRule Resolutionmodule.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Pega’s application layering, as taught in Pega Academy’sApplication Design Missionand thePega Certified Lead System Architect Study Guide, promotes a modular, reusable architecture using framework and implementation applications. This structure is ideal for organizations with multiple divisions requiring shared and specialized functionality.

Option A (Correct): Creating an enterprise application as a framework defines reusable components (e.g., common processes, data models) for all divisions. Division and unit applications are built as implementation applications on top, inheriting and specializing the framework. This promotes reuse and modularity, as documented in theApplication Layeringsection of Pega Community.

Option B (Incorrect): An enterprise application as an implementation structure lacks the reusable framework layer, leading to duplicated effort across divisions. Framework applications are needed for shared components, per theFramework Designmodule.

Option C (Incorrect): Combining framework and implementation structures in the enterprise application is redundant and violates Pega’s layering principles. The enterprise layer should be a framework, with implementations below it, as noted in theApplication Architectureguidelines.

Option D (Incorrect): Separate implementation applications communicating via DX APIs are siloed and reduce reuse. A framework-implementation structure is more efficient for shared processes, per theModular Designmodule.