PRINCE2-7-Practitioner PRINCE2 Project Management Practitioner (Version 7) Questions and Answers

The correct mapping is Item 1 — A; Item 2 — B; Item 3 — D .

Item 1 belongs under Quality method. It specifies how the required quality criterion will be verified: specialist equipment will measure whether the panels achieve the applicable energy-output standard. The method identifies the technique used to conduct the quality activity.

Item 2 belongs under Dates. It states when the quality activity is scheduled to occur—week 2 of stage 4—and also relates its timing to another quality activity, the security-system test.

Item 3 belongs under Result. It records the outcome of the completed test, specifically that one panel failed to satisfy the required energy-output standard. This is the actual result of the quality activity rather than its planned method or timing.

The remaining headings perform different functions. Responsibilities identify those accountable for carrying out, reviewing, or approving the quality activity. Records identify or reference the evidence and documentation produced as a consequence of the quality activity.

The quality register therefore provides an operational record of planned and completed quality activities, supporting traceability between what was to be tested, how and when it was tested, who was involved, and what outcome was obtained.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Quality practice; quality register; quality methods; quality-control activities; quality results; records and responsibilities.

===============

The correct answer is C . PRINCE2 7 treats people, relationships, collaboration, and effective communication as integral to successful project delivery. The project manager is not limited to monitoring work package completion; the role also involves maintaining an environment in which teams can coordinate their work, resolve dependencies, share information, and sustain effective working relationships.

The scenario identifies the underlying cause of delay: the survey and utilities teams are not sharing information required by other teams. Rejecting a short coordination forum solely because it consumes delivery time fails to address that root cause. A concise, structured forum can reduce downstream delay by exposing dependencies, clarifying outstanding information, and enabling team managers to resolve problems before they affect additional products.

Option A incorrectly transfers responsibility for overall project-team coordination entirely to individual team managers. Option B focuses on meeting time without considering the greater cost of continued information failure. Option D is also inappropriate because an exception report is required when a forecast indicates that agreed tolerances will be exceeded, not merely because coordination problems have arisen. The project manager should first use proportionate management action within delegated authority.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: People element; leading successful teams; communication; collaboration; relationships; managing product delivery.

===============

The correct answer is B . During evaluate a work package , the team manager periodically assesses actual and forecast performance against the authorized work package and, where applicable, the team plan. This requires consideration of relevant product, quality, risk, issue, lesson, and progress information so that the current status and forecast completion can be determined accurately.

Here, the missing electrical cabling has caused the security-system installation to be forecast one week late and beyond the delegated work-package time tolerance. Because management by exception operates through delegated tolerances, the team manager cannot simply absorb a forecast breach that lies outside the authority provided by the project manager. The project manager must therefore be informed.

The checkpoint report is the normal mechanism by which the team manager reports work-package progress to the project manager. However, a forecast tolerance breach should also be brought promptly to the project manager’s attention rather than waiting passively for routine reporting.

Option A identifies only one aspect of evaluation and fails to address the forecast tolerance breach. Option C incorrectly removes evaluation responsibility from the team manager. Option D bypasses the management hierarchy: a team manager escalates work-package exceptions to the project manager , not directly to the project board.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Managing product delivery; evaluate a work package; checkpoint reports; work-package tolerances; management by exception; escalation.

===============

The correct answer is B . Selecting the project approach during starting up a project is intended to establish an appropriate basis for how the project will be delivered before the organization commits significant resources to initiation. The delivery method and use of external suppliers can materially influence management controls, commercial arrangements, quality, sustainability, communication, risk, and other management approaches subsequently developed during initiation.

The team has identified an uncertainty arising directly from its proposed approach: a traditional delivery model combined with external suppliers may make sustainability requirements more difficult to achieve. Recording this early in the project log is appropriate because risks, issues, lessons, and other relevant information identified during starting up should not be ignored simply because detailed management approaches have not yet been completed.

Option A is too narrow. Clarifying contractual obligations may be relevant, but it is not the primary rationale demonstrated here. Option C incorrectly suggests that a manageable risk should be deferred; early identification allows it to influence initiation planning and development of the PID. Option D creates a false choice. Sustainability expectations may indeed inform quality requirements, but an uncertainty concerning whether the delivery approach will enable those requirements to be achieved is still legitimately a risk.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Starting up a project; select the project approach; project log; early risk identification; sustainability; project initiation documentation.

===============

The correct mapping is Statement 1 — F; Statement 2 — B; Statement 3 — A .

Statement 1 belongs in the commercial management approach because it concerns the commercial and sourcing arrangements for delivery. The use of an external supplier for most specialist work is a supplier and procurement consideration and therefore needs to be addressed through the project’s commercial management arrangements.

Statement 2 belongs in the benefits management approach because it specifies a measurable target, identifies how achievement will be monitored, and allocates responsibility for reviewing the resulting evidence. Although the target concerns sustainability, the statement is principally about how the target’s achievement will be measured and reviewed. Those arrangements are characteristic of benefits-management planning.

Statement 3 belongs in the business case because the committed funding relates directly to the investment required to undertake the project and therefore forms part of the project’s justification and financial basis.

The distractors serve different purposes. The sustainability management approach addresses how sustainability will be managed throughout the project; the end stage report records stage performance; and the project brief establishes the project’s initial foundation during starting up a project. The question tests the ability to distinguish closely related management products according to the specific information each is designed to control.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Business case practice; commercial management approach; benefits management approach; investment justification; management products.

===============

The correct answer is C . PRINCE2 7’s people element emphasizes effective leadership, collaboration, capability, relationships, and understanding the people actually available to the project. A capability shortfall should therefore be diagnosed before a disproportionate organizational response is selected.

The survey team is described as generally qualified; only a specific technical capability is missing. Replacing the entire team without assessing the competency gap could discard useful knowledge, disrupt established relationships, increase transition time, and—as the scenario explicitly states—cause substantial additional delay. A better leadership response is first to establish exactly what capability is missing and then assess proportionate interventions such as specialist support, targeted training, temporary augmentation, mentoring, or bringing in one specialist rather than replacing the complete team.

PeopleCert’s PRINCE2 7 guidance stresses the importance of team skills and collaboration and explicitly cautions against assuming that successful project leadership means replacing existing people whenever difficulties arise. It emphasizes working effectively with the team available and adapting the approach to people and circumstances.

Option A jumps directly to a disruptive solution. Option B incorrectly assumes that authority alone makes the proposed response appropriate. Option D overstates co-creation: agreed ways of working do not prevent justified changes to team composition.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: People element; leading successful teams; capability and competency; collaboration; relationships; tailoring ways of working.

===============

The correct answer is A . Manage by exception is based on delegating authority within explicitly agreed tolerances. Higher management sets boundaries within which the lower management level may make decisions without repeatedly seeking approval. Escalation becomes necessary when a tolerance is forecast to be exceeded.

In this scenario, the desired scope is 15 rapid-charging spaces, while the project board has accepted a lower limit of 10. That creates a defined permissible range for the scope of the relevant product or work package. The project manager can therefore delegate delivery within that range to the team manager. As long as the forecast remains within the agreed scope tolerance, routine design decisions do not need to be referred back upward. PeopleCert summarizes the principle by stating that authority should be delegated within agreed tolerances, avoiding both micromanagement and uncontrolled exceptions.

Option B incorrectly categorizes the tolerance as quality tolerance . The number of charging spaces concerns the extent of what is being delivered and is therefore a scope parameter. Options C and D undermine the fundamental purpose of management by exception by requiring unnecessary precision and escalation where authorized flexibility has deliberately been provided.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Manage by exception; tolerances; scope performance target; delegation; work packages; exception escalation.

===============

The correct answer is A — Project product description . The project product description defines the project’s overall output and establishes the principal basis on which that output will ultimately be judged acceptable. It includes the overall purpose, composition, quality expectations, acceptance criteria, and other characteristics necessary to determine whether the final project product is fit for its intended purpose.

The original statement that the design should be “consistent with its surroundings” is high level and inherently difficult to verify. During initiation, the project manager works with relevant stakeholders to translate that broad expectation into clearer design characteristics and measurable acceptance criteria . These details refine the definition of the overall project product and therefore belong in the project product description.

Option B is incorrect because a work package authorizes and controls specific work delegated to a team manager; it does not define the acceptance criteria for the entire project product. Option C, the product flow diagram, shows the sequence and dependencies involved in creating products rather than their acceptance requirements. Option D, the project plan, describes how and when the project’s products will be delivered, but the overall acceptance definition belongs in the project product description.

This refinement also supports stakeholder alignment by turning an ambiguous requirement into objectively testable acceptance conditions.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Plans practice; project product description; quality expectations; acceptance criteria; starting up a project; initiating a project.

===============

The correct answer is C — Prepare the project plan . Product-based planning is central to preparing a reliable PRINCE2 plan. The project team begins by defining and analysing the products that must be delivered and then establishes their dependencies, activities, resource requirements, estimates, and sequence.

The workshop described in the scenario is explicitly breaking the site-preparation and foundation products into greater detail. That is a planning activity. The discovery that a more comprehensive environmental impact assessment will be necessary also affects the work required to produce the project’s products and potentially its schedule, resources, dependencies, and costs. Those implications should therefore be incorporated while preparing the project plan.

Option A concerns deciding how PRINCE2 and organizational project-management requirements will be adapted to the circumstances of LouisShopping. It is not the activity in which detailed product decomposition is performed. Option B concerns establishing the management approaches governing areas such as risk, issues, quality, commercial management, sustainability, and digital/data management. Option D uses the resulting estimates and other planning information to develop the project’s detailed justification, but the product-based planning workshop itself belongs to preparation of the project plan.

The sequence is important: detailed planning information can subsequently inform refinement of the full business case.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Initiating a project; prepare the project plan; plans practice; product-based planning; product analysis; estimates and dependencies.

===============

The correct answer is A . When preparing the next stage plan, the project manager must incorporate all relevant authorized changes that affect the products or work to be undertaken in the forthcoming management stage. The stage plan must represent the current authorized baseline rather than an obsolete version of what was originally intended.

The additional trees and seating have already been authorized by the project board, and the change can be incorporated without a forecast breach of overall project tolerance. The project manager should therefore reflect the additional products and activities in the stage 3 plan, revise affected product descriptions and product-register information, and determine whether corresponding elements of the project initiation documentation need updating.

Option B is incorrect because an exception plan is not required for every authorized change. Exception planning is used where agreed tolerance is forecast to be exceeded and the higher management level requests a replacement plan. The scenario explicitly states that project tolerance is not forecast to be breached. Option C incorrectly introduces mandatory re-authorization by the business layer. Option D is incorrect because preparing the next stage plan is a project manager responsibility; project assurance may independently review the resulting information but does not prepare it instead.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Managing a stage boundary; prepare the next stage plan; authorized changes; product descriptions; product register; PID maintenance; exception plans.

===============

The correct answer is D . Under the manage by stages principle, a PRINCE2 project is divided into management stages that create defined governance and decision points. The project manager manages the current authorized stage, while the project board retains control over whether the project should proceed into the next management stage.

At a stage boundary, the project manager normally provides the information required for the project board to assess performance, review the updated business case and project plan, consider risks and issues, and evaluate the next stage plan. The board can then decide whether continued investment remains justified and whether the next stage should be authorized. PeopleCert guidance describes management stages as controlled segments with review points at which continuation can be approved or stopped.

Releasing funding for stages 2 and 3 does not remove the governance requirement to reassess the project before stage 3 starts. Option A confuses the project manager’s delegated day-to-day authority within an authorized stage with authority to proceed automatically across stage boundaries. Option B concerns reporting customization rather than stage authorization. Option C incorrectly focuses on which corporate entity provides funding rather than the PRINCE2 control mechanism being tested.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Manage by stages; Managing a stage boundary; Directing a project; continued business justification; authorization of a stage.

===============

The correct answer is D — Accept a work package . The first activity in the managing product delivery process ensures that the team manager fully understands the proposed work package and determines that it can realistically be delivered before accepting responsibility for it.

The BuildyBrick team manager therefore needs to examine the required products, product descriptions, constraints, tolerances, interfaces, quality requirements, reporting arrangements, available resources, and relevant issues and risks. The team manager also determines how the specialist team will be organized and controlled and, where appropriate, develops or confirms the team plan. Any concerns about achievability should be discussed with the project manager before acceptance rather than discovered after work has begun.

Option B occurs after the work package has been accepted and covers development of the products, performance of quality activities, management of delivery, and handling of issues and risks during execution. Option C occurs periodically during delivery to evaluate progress and status against the work package and team plan, including preparation of checkpoint information. Option A occurs at the end, once completed products and required approvals are ready to be handed back to the project manager.

Therefore, confirming that the work is achievable within its stated constraints is an essential part of accepting the work package .

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Managing product delivery; accept a work package; team manager; work package constraints; team planning; Ref. 17.4.1.

===============

The correct answer is C — Progress . The progress practice establishes mechanisms for comparing actual achievements with planned targets, forecasting future performance, controlling deviations, and providing appropriate information to decision-makers. At project closure, this includes reviewing overall project performance against the baselines and targets that were originally authorized.

The end project report provides the project board with a consolidated assessment of how the project performed. In this scenario, the project manager records that actual cost exceeded the budget by 10% and actual duration exceeded the planned schedule by 15%. These are direct comparisons between actual and planned performance , placing the information squarely within the progress practice.

Sharing the findings with the LOB Portfolio Director also enables experience from the LouisShopping project to support organizational learning. This does not change the primary practice being demonstrated: the information being analysed and communicated is project performance against authorized targets.

Option A concerns whether continued or completed investment was justified in terms of costs, benefits, risks, and business objectives. Option B concerns creation and maintenance of plans. Option D concerns ensuring products meet defined quality requirements. Although each may contribute information to project closure, the specific evaluation of cost and time performance belongs principally to progress .

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Progress practice; end project report; actual versus planned performance; project closure; lessons and organizational learning.

===============