PRINCE2 PRINCE2-7-Practitioner Exam Dumps - Actual Questions Answers

The correct mapping is Action 1 — A; Action 2 — E; Action 3 — C .

For Action 1 , the appointment of an additional contractor exceeds the project manager’s delegated authority. Although both options remain within overall stage cost and time tolerances, the project manager cannot authorize a decision that falls outside their defined authority. The matter must therefore be referred to the appropriate project-board authority, with the project executive responsible for leading the decision.

For Action 2 , maintaining project records is part of the project manager’s day-to-day management responsibility. Once a decision has been taken, the project manager should ensure that the issue record is updated with the authorized response and decision so that there is an accurate audit trail.

For Action 3 , the senior supplier represents those providing specialist resources and expertise to create the project’s products. Confirming that appropriate supplier resources can be made available for additional site-clearance work consequently aligns with the supplier interest.

This question illustrates that issue management must operate within the project’s governance and delegation arrangements. Remaining within tolerance does not automatically permit the project manager to take an action specifically outside their delegated authority.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Issues practice; delegated authority; issue report; issue register; project executive; project manager; senior supplier.

===============

The correct answer is B — Prepare the next stage plan . The managing a stage boundary process ensures that the project board receives sufficient information to review the current stage and make an informed decision about authorizing the next one. Preparing the next stage plan includes determining how the forthcoming stage will be organized, resourced, managed, and controlled.

The replacement subcontractor will perform important utilities and systems work during stage 3. Consequently, the project manager must consider whether the existing project management team remains appropriate for the forthcoming stage. Recommending the subcontractor’s account manager as the new senior supplier is directly connected with establishing appropriate supplier representation and governance for the work that will be undertaken in that next stage.

Option A concerns revising the higher-level project plan using current information and forecasts; it does not primarily establish stage-specific project management team arrangements. Option C concerns assessing how the current stage performed, including achievements and lessons. Option D occurs after the necessary stage-boundary information has been prepared and is used to request authorization from the project board.

The recommendation should therefore be developed while preparing the next stage plan , so that the required organization and supplier representation are clear before authorization of stage 3 is requested.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Managing a stage boundary; prepare the next stage plan; organization; senior supplier; supplier representation; project management team.

===============

The correct answer is D . A product description must define a product sufficiently clearly for its creation, review, and approval to be planned and controlled. Merely stating that the shopping centre will contain an underground car park identifies the existence of a required component, but it does not provide an adequate quality specification .

For effective quality management, measurable characteristics should be established so that the product can be objectively assessed against agreed expectations. Depending on the product, these may include capacity, dimensions, accessibility provisions, charging facilities, structural requirements, security arrangements, environmental standards, or other measurable characteristics. Appropriate quality tolerances may also be defined where controlled variation is permissible.

Option A is incorrect because existence alone does not establish whether the car park is fit for purpose. Option B similarly confuses confirmation of delivery with verification of acceptable quality. Option C is incorrect because the quality management approach defines how quality will be managed across the project; it is not the repository for all detailed product-specific quality specifications.

The product description therefore needs sufficient measurable information to enable planning of quality-control activities and objective verification that the delivered product meets its defined requirements.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Quality practice; product descriptions; quality specifications; quality tolerances; quality control; acceptance and verification.

===============