Admission Tests GRE Exam Dumps - Actual Questions Answers

Educational institutions have played a vital role in forming the basis and the foundation for any student. Many places of study nowadays encourage students to travel and explore new places of study and also explore the possible learning experiences across the globe. I personally agree with the given statement that each individual should be encouraged to travel and study from various places which would improve not just their knowledge but also enhance their exposure to the various cultural and anthropological features in the foreign place.

I have always been inquisitive and eager to know about the eastern culture and the tradition and even many of the languages. If I get the opportunity to travel and study I will be fortunate to experience the nuances of the culture first hand. To add on. in person experience leaches a student about the inclusive nature of the individual in a new environment. It would also show them the various ideas and theories about their field of study.

For example, my friend who studied architecture went to japan for a semester and he was amazed by the kind of buildings and the kind of patterns the people had used. It helps us to understand the various possibilities and the various horizons that we might not even be exposed to if we do not travel.

It is significant and important for every person to travel to the new places in order to explore about the learning options and also to learn about themselves. Universities are the place where on get sthe opportunity to learn as much as and even make any errors as they are a student. Learning possibilities and options are open and they get to learn and explore as much as possible.

To conlcude. I have alwasy believed that a student is someone who has been boundaries or borders for learnign and he ought to explore as much as possible beyond the geographical barriers.

We live in an altrustic world where being selfish and self centred have become commonplace It is human nature to be selfish and think for one self as stated in the claim, at time s even when we tend to act for three wellbeing and goodness of other it is hidden and implied there would be a reason for the action I strongly agree with the given claim and also the reason on which the claim is based upon

Firstly, every action that is being done by humans, the hughest and most evolved form of animals tend to have certain primitive features still attached. The simple act of placing oneself and then close ones in priority when in terms of decision making. For example, people always make sure that they have fulfilled their own needs and sometimes they ensure that their wants are also fulfilled. This trait of humans would never change and it would be the same even in the future Even in the dystopian literature and the novels that I have come across humans have never been projected as a selfless creature.

Secondly, the phlight of the reason is imperative to be understood. The claim is being bolstered and strengthened through the reason The word' All actions" might sound a bit hyperbole and may be exagerated but in general most for he actions done by people for the welfare of the others would have a significant and crucial feature in the their own wellbeing. To illustrate, my friend used to teach us certain chapters and concepts in high school later he revealed tat teaching us helped him to understand the concepts and even remember them even better As stated above, the claim is certainly true to a greater extent, however the reason might be blown out of proportion. Just as how selfishness is a human triat so is selflessness.

To conclude, human life is filled with balances always, people tend to be good for the others and might expect certain benefits for themself This inherent trait at least keeps the sense of helping tendecy alive. Hence I would agree that even when people act for the other it would have some tangible or intangible benefit for oneself.

The letter states a proposal to act as a solution for a given problem. It states that milk producers have increased the price of milk inspite of an increase in the supply, which enables them to receive excessive profits. The given suggestion is that government intervention might be a possible solution for addressing this issue. The proposal has given only a subjective view but has failed to prove how the government intervention might help them reach the required outcome through valid evidences.

Firstly. The letter has failed to address the population growth in the region of Batavia. in the event of considering the supply and demand in a place. It is crucial to take into consideration the population of the place the equal proportion of the growth in the number of dairy farms This might lead to many reasons and it could also dissolve the issue if the population outburst might have happened.

Another major issue that the letter has failed to address is the impact of the general rpice inflation. It is to be understood that in any economy it is imperative that there would be an increase in the price of products and services over a period of time. There could even be an increase in the raw materials, fodder, and medical expenses incurred by the dairy farm owners and milk manufacturers.

The third arbitrary assumption made by the letter would be that the profits are being solely taken by the manufacturers, the labor wages, cost of production and even the cost incurred doing the deliver) might have substantially increased. If various such factors are to be considered then the appropriate solution cannot be just the government intervention and there might be a need for a more comprehensive solution.

To conclude, the letter might appear to have addressed the issue but in reality it has failed to view it from the different dimension and ultimately fails to give a clear responsive view with valued evidences and supportive data.